Description: Maranoa Logo Process

 

BUSINESS PAPER

ATTACHMENTS

 

General Meeting

 

Wednesday 24 July 2013

 

Roma Administration Centre

 

NOTICE OF MEETING

 

Date: 22 July 2013

 

Mayor:                                                    Councillor R S Loughnan

 

Deputy Mayor:                                        Councillor W S Wason

Councillors:                                             Councillor J L Chambers

                                                              Councillor R J Denton

                                                              Councillor P J Flynn

                                                              Councillor W M Newman

                                                              Councillor C J O’Neil

                                                              Councillor M L Price

                                                              Councillor D J Schefe

 

Chief Executive Officer:                            Ms Julie Reitano

 

Senior Management:                                Mr Tony Klein (Director Community & Commercial Services)

                                                              Mr Michael Parker (Acting Director Infrastructure Services)

                                                              Mr Rob Hayward (Director Development, Facilities & Environmental Services)

 

Officers:                                                  Ms Jane Frith (Coordinator Corporate Communications)

 

Please find attached agenda for the General Meeting to be held at the Roma Administration Centre on July 24, 2013 at 9.00am.

Julie Reitano

Chief Executive Officer

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  24 July 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item       Subject

No

 

Reports

 

10.2       Council Initiated Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

              Attachment 1:         Bassett Park Master Planning Advisory Group Confirmed Minutes - 12.03.13 ............................................................................................................... 2

              Attachment 2:         Airport Advisory Committee Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 23.05.13.... 6

              Attachment 3:         Roma CBD Advisory Committee Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 04.06.13      11

              Attachment 4:         Roma Saleyards Advisory Committee Confirmed Minutes - 02.05.13 16 

 

12.1       Road Off Alignment - Overstone Road

              Attachment :            Map of Overstone Road...................................................................... 18

 

13.1       Material Change of Use - "Motel" (25 Units and Manager's Residence) and Reconfiguring a Lot (Access Easement) (File: 2012/18397)

              Attachment 1:         Body of Report.................................................................................... 19

              Attachment 2:         Development Plans............................................................................. 36

              Attachment 3:         Easement Plan.................................................................................... 44

              Attachment 4:         Department of Transport and Main Roads Conditions....................... 45

              Attachment 5:         Infrastructure Charges Report............................................................ 57

 

13.2       Renewal of Term Lease 222210

              Attachment :            DNRM Letter & Map - Lot A on CP882774 - Reserve for Grazing Purposes 77

 

Status Reports       

 

Confidential Items

 

In accordance with the provisions of section 275 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, a local government may resolve to close a meeting to the public to discuss confidential items that it’s Councillors or members consider it necessary to close the meeting.

 

Councillor Business

 

22.1       Roma CBD Advisory Committee Recommendations

              Attachment 1:         Roma CBD Advisory Committee Confirmed Minutes - 04.06.13 ...... 80

              Attachment 2:         Unconfirmed Minutes - Roma CBD Advisory Committee - 02.07.13. 85

 

 

    


Attachment 1

Bassett Park Master Planning Advisory Group Confirmed Minutes - 12.03.13

 

 

Meeting:                     Bassett Park Planning Advisory Committee

Date:                           12 March, 2013

Chair:                          Cr. Cameron O’Neil               

Attendees:                 Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. Peter Flynn, Cr. David Schefe, Fiona Vincent MRC – Coordinator – Sport & Recreation, Hamish Neil MRC – Sport & Recreation Officer, Neil, Lloyd Waldron MRC – Coordinator – Bassett Park Facility, Rob Hayward MRC – Director – Development, Facilities & Environmental Services,  John Ethell – Steering Committee Indoor Equine Facility, Jackie Erickson – Roma Turf Club & Roma Picnic Race Club, Carla Cosgrove – Roma Show Society           

 

Apologies                   Alaistair Brown, Bill McLean, Kellie McLean, Cam Colley, John Mulcahy, John Scott President, Loretta Thomas, Melanie Lindsay, Melissa Nobbs, Ranald Ferrier, Roma Camp Draft Association, Ron Wards, Sussan Evans, Tony Klein MRC, Camile Johnson.

Minutes:                     Kelly Rogers

 

Meeting Opened:     6.00PM

Meeting Closed:       7.22PM

 

 

Next Meeting Details

Date:                           16 April 2013

Time:                          6.00PM

Location:                    Members Bar Bassett Park


 

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

3.0

Master Planning – next steps

Requirements listing to be developed in preparation for securing of an external consultant to compile a master plan for Bassett Park.

Hamish Neil

TBC

Report to Council for consideration of securing the services of an External Consultant to progress development of the Master Plan. $20,000 remaining in the Council Budget for this service.

Fiona Vincent

TBC

4.0

Development of Group Charter

Draft Terms of Reference to be circulated to all members and interested parties for discussion and adoption at the next meeting.

Kelly Rogers/All

20 March 2013

6.0

Update on stables

Stable demolishing works to commence after the 2013 Roma Show and construction of the new stables to be completed by the 2013 Roma Cup, so as to not impact race meets.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Design options A & B to be circulated for comment.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Three (3) quotations to be obtained for construction and presented to Council for consideration at GM 24/04/13

Rob Hayward

24April 2013

7.0

Review & update of ‘Wish List’

All groups to review current ‘Wish List.’ Hamish to follow up with outstanding groups for collation of final wish list and presentation at next meeting.

Hamish Neil/All

16 April 2013

PA system be assessed for suitability as a priority.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Priorities identified by the Maranoa Equestrian Club to be further clarified with Susan Evans.

Fiona Vincent

14 April 2013

Remove side loading ramp from Australia Stock Horse Society (and Campdraft) wish list.

Hamish Neil

14 April 2013

8.0

User Group Reports

Roma Turf Club & Roma Picnics willing to invest funds to support improvement to the bar facility & assisting with management.

Rob Hayward/Jackie Erickson

TBC

All user agreements currently under review.

Fiona Vincent/Hamish Neil

TBC

9.0

Maintenance requests & updates

All maintenance requests to be forwarded to Kelly for collation in preparation for budget considerations for 2013/14.

All/Kelly Rogers

TBC

 


 

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2              Confirmation of Minutes

Action items of the minutes were reviewed and updates provided accordingly. 

It was agreed that the group initially meet on a monthly basis and at an agreed time frame move to bi-monthly meetings. 

Once the Bassett Park Planning Advisory Committee requirements are completed, the Chair advised that it is intended the Committee be changed to “The Bassett Park Advisory Committee”, and approached similar to the current Roma Saleyards Advisory Committee structure.

 

Item 3              Master Planning – next steps

 

Items for inclusion in developing the master plan-

 

·     The construction of an indoor/covered sporting arena that could cater for all horse sports & major events, suggested location northern side of ground (other side of McPhee Street); 

·     Sporting ovals to be located on the eastern side of the ground; include sports as a minimum – Netball, Soccer, Athletics, Cricket

·     Campdraft & Rodeo potentially to move to eastern side of ground;

·     Increased number of stables requested;

·     Moveable grand stands have been purchased by the Roma Show Society;

·     Rodeo & Campdraft to provide input into design of suitable arena;

·     Portable clip on speakers requested;

·     Portable lighting requested;

·     Pricing of usage to be considered i.e. don’t outprice groups ability to hire or use venue (business plan);

·     Once built, consideration needs to be given to funding of ongoing maintenance (business plan);

·     Consider requesting of financial input from Gas Industry companies;

·     Increase facilities’ ability to host state and national sporting events and expand tourism opportunities;

·     Consider purchase of a new marquee or semi-permanent structure, which could double as a function Room for weddings, conferences etc. all inclusive of appropriate venue equipment (given this cannot be hired locally at present);

·     Review of current amenity facilities to accommodate all users;

·     Investigate upgrade of current kitchen and buildings on site, deteriorating condition;

·     Consider storage of equipment for various groups;

·     Location of facilities and drainage has to be considered with flood survey plans.

 

 

 

 

Item 4              Development of Group Charter

Refer Action items.

 

Item 5              Update on Bungil Street Sports Fields

Cr. Flynn advised those present that Council would no longer progress the former proposal in further developing the Bungil Street Sports Precinct due to the location being flood prone.  Little Athletics, Junior Soccer and Cricket groups have indicated they are not opposed to moving from the Bungil Street Precinct to Bassett Park.  Touch football is happy to remain at the Bungil Street Precinct at this stage.  

 

Item 6              Update on Stables

Refer Action items.

 

Item 7              Review & update of ‘Wish List’

Update provided by those present, further review required by groups not represented at the meeting.

 

Item 8              User Group Reports

Those present provided an update.

 

Item 9              Maintenance requests & updates

Lloyd provided an update on current progress of maintenance requests.    

 

 

...............................................                                                                                                                         .............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                                               Date

 


Attachment 2

Airport Advisory Committee Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 23.05.13

 

Meeting:                     Airport Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                           23 May, 2013

Chair:                          Cr. Joy Denton                       

Attendees:                 Cr. Joy Denton, Cr. David Schefe, Ben Jones MRC – Manager Airports (Roma, Injune & Surat), Michael Parker – Director – Infrastructure Services, Keith Tonkin – Aviation Projects, Peter Flynn – Maranoa Travel Centre, Anthony McDonald – Hertz Roma, Vickie Beitz, Shane Brumby – MI Helicopters, Barry McCabe – Roma Aero Club, Meryl Brumpton – Flying Surgical & Flying Obstetric Service,  Gary Schefe – President Commerce Roma, Lyn Kajewski – Roma Tourism Association Inc, Ian Rollinson, Robert Lethbridge

 

Apologies                   Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Keith Chandler, Anthony Partridge – TransLink, Christopher Kerr – Care Flight Group QLD, Adrian Harding – Europcar, Scott Rodgers – Air BP, Greg Shaw, Jon Hamer – Qantas

 

Minutes:                     Christina Tincknell

 

Meeting Opened:     5:00pm

Meeting Closed:       7:10pm

 

 

Next Meeting Details

Date:               27th June 2013

Time:              5:00pm                       

Location:        To be advised


 

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

2.0

Setting the Scene and the Role of the Committee

Review the Terms of Reference and provide feedback in preparation for endorsement at the next meeting.

All Committee Members

By the next meeting 27th June 2013

3.0

Develop an understanding of the legislative framework airports operate under

If required request copies of the documents below can be provided, alternatively they can also be accessed via the following links

·      Civil Aviation Act 1988

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2012C00006

·      Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012C00363

·      Manual of Standards (Part 139)

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012C00095

·      Aviation Transport Security Act 2004

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2012C00104

·      Aviation Transport Security Regulations 2005

http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/F2012C00148

All Committee Members

By the next meeting 27th June 2013

4.0

Roma Airport Master Plan

Toilet facilities permitted to be installed airside

Ben Jones

TBA

5.0

Future Topics for Scheduling

Submit via the Airport Advisory Committee Agenda Nomination form attached to the minutes

All Committee Members

Prior to the next meeting 27th June 2013

 

 

 


 

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2              Setting the Scene and the Role of the Committee

Cr. Denton outlined the purpose of the Maranoa Regional Council Airports Advisory Committee as per the provided attachment Terms of Reference.

Any individual wishing an item to be included in the agenda should submit the item via the Airport Advisory Committee Agenda Nomination form attached to the minutes.

Cr. Denton requested that the committee members take a copy of the Terms of Reference and provide any feedback committee members may in preparation for endorsement at the next meeting.              

                       

                       

Item 3              Regulatory & Legislative Requirements

Ben Jones outlined the regulatory and legislative requirements to provide a link to the Terms of Reference and to provide a clear background of the legislative requirements that aerodromes operate under.

 

Legislation & Regulations

·     Aviation Transport Security Act & Regulation

Transport Security Program (TSP)

·     Civil Aviation Safety Regulation  and Civil Aviation Act

·     Manual of Standards (Part 139)

Aerodrome Manual

Drug and Alcohol Management Plan

Safety Management System

Aerodrome Emergency Management Plan

 

Copies of the following documents can be provided to committee members upon request, all other documents are confidential and are controlled documents

·     Civil Aviation Safety Act & Regulation

·     Manual of Standards (Part 139)

·     Aviation Transport Security Act & Regulation

 

Item 4              Roma Airport Master Plan

The Airport master plan is a planning document that will change the focus of the Roma Airport from a project phase into an operational airport applying strategic thinking to the operations or future development of the airport to fulfil the needs of the airport in the long term.

 

Preliminary Finding WorkshoP PRESENTATION

Presenter: Keith Tonkin, Aviation Projects

 

The following provided attachments were discussed

·     Roma Airport terminal schematic plan

·     Car park concept layout (Option A)

·     RPT apron revision A

·     General Aviation precinct revision B

 

Discussion: Gary Schefe asked ‘Has the terminal expansion allowed for the inclusion of retail outlets other than the kiosk?’

Response: It was identified that areas within the layout of the airport terminal expansion could accommodate the inclusion of retail outlets and this feedback will be included in the plan for council to consider. NO VOTE TAKEN

 

SUMMARY

•     Five year development plan within a 20 year master plan

•     Sustainable approach

•     Consolidate upgrade project to meet peak demand

–    Airside generally adequate

–    Passenger terminal redevelopment

–    Car parking

•     Enhance customer experience

•     Preparation for a second operator BNE-RMA

•     Expand general aviation precinct

•     Develop commercial opportunities

•     Integrate accommodation village

 

Discussion: Peter Flynn asked ‘Are toilets permitted to be installed airside for ground handling staff?’

Response: Unsure of the stipulation on this, to be advised.

 

Discussion: Anthony McDonald asked ‘How is the access for the Rental Car booths designed?’

Response: A walkway located behind the booths with screens separating each booth.

Discussion: Gary Schefe asked ‘Is there any indications of a cost at this stage?’

Response: Terminal development & some airside works estimated to be $3.3 million, these are only estimates at this stage and are subject to change with the scope of the works.

                       

Item 5              Future Topics for Scheduling

Shane Brumby

MI Helicopters: Parking in non-parking areas. Charter flight passengers have been parking in no parking areas, around the Aero Club and BP refuelling point. Vehicles are right on the edge of the road and becoming obstacles for traffic travelling through these areas

Peter Flynn

Maranoa Travel Centre airport operator & charter flight scheduling. Frequently having 3 or 4 aircraft arriving at the airport at once because of the scheduling times allocated from Brisbane. There is a current lack of RPT parking when too many aircraft arrive at one time.

Barry McCabe

Water saturation around the Aero Club building, located to the south side of the building when works are being completed. This also occurs when the sprinkle is left on too long.

 

Charters use the Aero Club as a waiting area for FIFO employees. The Aero club would like to erect an undercover seating area with tables at the aero club for FIFO workers to utilise, require council permission to commence. FIFO companies may be interested in helping with funding.

Ian Rollinson

Ag planes mixing chemicals on the apron of the Surat Airport. New entrance, bunding area or concrete area so that the trucks are not crossing the apron. The current access gate is situated near a drain.

 

AVDATA to recoup charges and track traffic at the Surat Airport.

 

Item 6 Future Planning Considerations

 

Discussion: Toilet access in the terminal, is there enough toilets to handle the number of passengers coming and going through the terminal? Are the toilets designed to be larger than the current facilities?

Response: The current design accommodates the predicted passenger numbers that will utilise the terminals. Believe the corridor leading to the toilets is staying the same, but this can be looked at in the plans.

 

Discussion: Barry McCabe asked ‘Can General Aviation (GA) be extended so as to account for the helicopters in the GA area. Pavement strength does not need to be as high for this area?

Response: This could be considered

 

...............................................                                                                                                                         .............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                                               Date


Attachment 3

Roma CBD Advisory Committee Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 04.06.13

 

 

Meeting:                     Roma CBD Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                           4 June 2013

Chair:                          Cr. Cameron O’Neil               

Attendees:                 Justin Garvie, Kevin Chambers, Robert Nugent, Milly Chandler, Jacki Erickson, Ian Galloway, Gabrielle Barron,  Linette Chandler, Jim Scott, Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. Peter Flynn,  Kym Downey, Katrina Marsh, Tyson Golder.

 

 

Apologies                   Sarah Holt, Tony Klein, Gary Schefe.

Minutes:                     Kelly Rogers

 

Meeting Opened:     6.04pm                                                                              

Meeting Closed:       7.29pm

 

 

Next Meeting Details

 

Date:                           Tuesday 2 July 2013

Time:                          6.00pm

Location:                    Bassett Park Members Bar


 

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

2.0

Setting the scene & role of the Committee

That a list of concerns and wishes for redevelopment of the Roma CBD be forwarded to Kelly Rogers for collation prior to the next meeting.

All

26 June 2013

3.0

Terms of Reference

Terms of Reference definition of the Roma CBD to be amended to state:-

·      To the north until Bungil Street

·      To the south until Mayne Street

·      To the east until Charles Street

·      To the west until Feather Street

 

Update the “Quorum” definition to state:-

The minimum quorum shall be 7 members.

 

The amended draft Terms of Reference are to be circulated to members with the minutes in preparation for the next meeting.

Kelly Rogers

14 June 2013

All members review the draft Terms of Reference and provide feedback to Kelly Rogers for group consideration at the next meeting on 2 July 2013.

All

Kelly Rogers

26 June 2013

5.0

Regulated Cark Parking update

A copy of the Roma Car Parking Audit undertaken by Council be circulated to members.

Kelly Rogers

9 June 2013

Regulated Car Parking be included as an Agenda item for next meeting. 

Kelly Rogers

2 July 2013

6.0

General Business

Investigate Council’s ability to regulate and manage potential fire hazards identified in the Roma CBD.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Investigate Council’s ability to implement a separate rating charge on land zoned for commercial purposes where establishments that are not open to the public for trade.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Investigate the extent of Council’s authority in regulating designated smoking locations and litter of cigarette butts.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Council consider clearly marking taxi ranks through better located signage and marking on the bitumen.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

 


 

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2              Setting the Scene and the Role of the Committee

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil, provided an overview of Council’s reasoning in formulating the Roma CBD Advisory Committee.  He further advised the group that the Roma Placemaking Strategy – October 2011, adopted by Council, forms the basis from which the committee can put forward their recommendations for amendments.   These recommendations will in turn be put to Council for formal consideration.  The Chair further clarified that the focus of the group is specifically around planning for redevelopment of the Roma CBD as defined under the documented “Terms of Reference.”

 

Attending members were provided a hard copy of the Maranoa Placemaking Strategy – Roma and the 2013 Local Plan - Roma , Muckadilla & Hodgson.

 

Each member was asked to introduce themselves, explain their motivation for joining the committee and speak about what they saw as a priority for the group.  A number of key priorities were identified, including:-

 

·     Addressing the number of and availability of car parking in the CBD;

·     A need to revitalise the town centre to make it an appealing place to establish a business and for shoppers ‘stop and shop;’

·     Reinstate a sense of friendly ‘Country Town’ character;

·     Build upon the town history (Australian flag, town clock, bottle trees) and art trail to create a vibrant culture that attracts tourists;

·     Create meeting points in the CBD (e.g. alfresco dining);

·     Make the town safe for pedestrians, including the elderly, through use of crossings and providing bus shelters.

 

Group reporting & outputs

Discussion was undertaken on formalising the frequency of reporting to Council and determination of a time line for formal submission of recommended amendments to the Roma Placemaking Strategy, pertaining to redevelopment of the Roma CBD.  A vote was taken by attending members, with all in favour of the following approach:-

 

Resolution Number RC.01.13

That:-

1.   The adopted Minutes of each committee meeting be formally reported to Council on a monthly basis;

2.   The committee submit to Council a listing of recommended changes to the Roma Placemaking plan by 1 December 2013;

3.   All formal requests to Council be put forward on behalf of the Committee by representing Councillor Committee members for formal submission to full Council.

 

CARRIED

 

 

Item 3              Draft Terms of Reference

 

A hard copy of the draft Terms of Reference was provided to attending members, a review undertaken, with some changes agreed.  These changes are detailed under the heading “Meeting Actions.”  It was also generally agreed by all present that any identified constraints be dealt with by the Chair on an “as needs basis.”

 

Item 4              Budget

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil advised members that Council is currently undertaking budget deliberations for the 2013/14 financial year, inclusive of a budget for redevelopment of the Roma CBD.  Once formally adopted by Council, this figure will be provided to members.  Council will also seek any available additional funding from sources such as, but not limited to the Federal & State government.

 

Item 5              Regulated Car Parking Update

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil advised members that a copy of the Roma car park audit undertaken by Council will be provided to members for review. Council is currently investigating leasing of a parcel of land in the CBD to increase the number of available car parks.

 

All present discussed Council’s proposal to introduce regulated parking, indicating that while difficult to achieve a balance was needed to best meet the needs of shoppers, including elderly, utilisation of shared zoning & business (staff parking).  Members also discussed the importance of exploring opportunities to encouraging shoppers to shop for longer, and the CBD being more extensively used as a meeting point.

 

Regulated Parking is to be included as an agenda item for next meeting for further discussion, with Roger White & Barry Winter from QPS invited to attend the next meeting to provide input into parking in the Roma CBD.

 

 

Item 6              General Business

 

Fire Hazards in the CBD

It was requested that the group be informed of Council’s ability to regulate and manage potential fire hazards identified in the Roma CBD. 

 

Council rating

It was requested that the group be informed on Council’s ability separately rate establishments on the main street that are not open to the public for trade.

 

Public Toilets – Arthur Street, Roma 

The group raised concerns with respect to the condition of the public toilets located on Arthur Street in Roma.  In response the Chair advised those present that Council had approved for the public toilets to be demolished, with further approval given for the construction of a new amenity block (with mural), in the vicinity.  He further explained that the current toilet block is located on a road reserve and cannot be extended to accommodate the provision of a mother’s room and disabled toilet. 

 

It was requested that the collective view of the group be provided to Council, being:-

 

·     The new toilets be constructed of similar material in order to maintain a comfortable temperature during extreme heat;

·     Council seek support from local businesses in maintaining the tidiness of the existing toilet block;

·     The new toilets be constructed to accommodate the provision of mothers room and disabled toilet.

 

 A vote was taken on the matter with a majority in favour of this approach and recorded as follows:-

 

Resolution Number RC.02.13

 

That Council place on hold the demolishing of the existing public toilets and consider for the existing block to remain operational, in addition to the new amenity block. 

 

CARRIED

 

Regulation of smoking locations/litter

It was requested that the group be informed of Council’s extent of authority in regulating designated smoking locations at Westlands Plaza and the subsequent litter of cigarette butts.

 

Taxi Ranks

It was requested that Council consider clearly marking taxi ranks with better located signage and marking of the bitumen.

 

There being no further business the Chair thanked all members for their attendance and closed the meeting at 7.29pm.

 

 

 

 

.............................................                                                                                                                                     ............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                                                          Date


Attachment 4

Roma Saleyards Advisory Committee Confirmed Minutes - 02.05.13

 


 


Attachment 1

Map of Overstone Road

 

 


Attachment 1

Body of Report

 

1.0  Background information

 

The application is for a Motel consisting of 25 units and a manager’s residence. The proposed development has a gross floor area of 1,145 square metres and a site cover of 37% of the total site area. The proposed buildings will be limited to a maximum height of two storeys and 7.4 metres above ground level.

 

Left in/left out vehicular access to the site is proposed from Quintin Street via a new 6.8 metre wide vehicle crossover.  The existing easement on the site, which provides access to the adjoining land parcel to the west, is proposed to be relocated to the south to form part of the internal driveway to the site.

 

Each unit will be provided with a dedicated car parking space with an additional space for the site manager, resulting in a total of 26 spaces.  Two of these spaces are dedicated for persons with disabilities.

 

Access and manoeuvring has been designed for a Refuse Collection Vehicle (RCV), with a designated parking space available adjacent to the refuse collection area.  A designated bus parking space is not provided, with standing proposed over vacant car parking spaces along the northern boundary of the site.

 

Traffic movements to and from the site are expected to be at a maximum of 75 trips per day, with 10 vehicles per hour during both morning and afternoon peak periods.  A Traffic Impact Assessment prepared by RMA Engineers concludes that the generated traffic volumes will have no impact on the existing road network.  DTMR are a Concurrence Agency for the proposed development and have imposed conditions to address the impact of the development on road corridors (refer to Appendix 4).

 

A 1.8 metre high fence will be provided along the McDowall and Quintin Street frontages of the site.  Landscaping with a minimum width of 1.5 metres down McDowall Street and 2.0 metres down Quintin Street is proposed to screen the development from the streets. 

 

This intersection provides the “western gateway” statement for the main commercial/retail street in Roma.  The original plans lodged did not recognise the importance of the visual amenity of this intersection, nor the statement it made to visitors coming from the west, the north and from the airport.  Some changes to the external appearance were negotiated with applicant.  In addition, it is proposed to impose a condition to construct a cantilevered awning to both break up the bulk of the building and provide pedestrian protection as existed with the previous Empire Hotel.  The applicant provided plans of a proposed awning and this proposal will be used to condition the development, while keeping within the lateral and vertical clearances required by DTMR.

 

The existing sewer main and manhole on the site is located within the Motel’s hardstand and car parking area, to enable ease of access.  An Engineering Services Report prepared by RMA Engineers confirms that the sewage system has sufficient capacity to service the development.  A water network analysis is proposed to be undertaken at the Building Works stage to confirm the adequacy of the existing water infrastructure.  No on-site water supply storage is proposed for fire fighting purposes, however the existing hydrant located 10 metres to the north of the site on Quintin Street is proposed to be adequate for this purpose. 

 

The Stormwater Management Plan prepared by RMA Engineers proposes grading of the car parking area to Quintin Street, with legal point of discharge to the existing kerbside infrastructure along Quintin and McDowall Streets.  A 20,000L underground rainwater tank is proposed to allow water reuse for irrigation and non-potable internal uses.

2.0       Definition of use and assessment status - the premises – locality and zoning

The proposed use is defined as a "Motel" in the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006 which is described as follows:

“Motel” means any premises used for temporary accommodation of travellers and the motor vehicles used by them and includes, if provided, any restaurant, office and/or manager’s residence on the same site.  The term also includes boarding-houses, guest houses, hostels, unlicensed hotels, serviced rooms, student accommodation, or any similar use.

 

The site is situated at 129-131 McDowall Street, Roma QLD 4455 and described as Lot 2 on RP60707 (refer Figure 1 - Locality Plan).

 

Figure 1 - Locality Plan                                                                                                      Source: Whereis 2011

 

The site is situated in the Commercial Zone of the Town Area of the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006 (refer Figure 2 - Zoning).

Figure 2 - Zoning                                                                 Source: Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006

 

The site is currently vacant, having previously contained the Empire Hotel.

 

The adjoining sites to the north and west contain single storey commercial buildings.  The site is bounded to the east and south by Quintin Street and McDowall Streets respectively (refer Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph).

 

Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph                                                                                                            Source: Google 2010

 

 

 

 

3.0       Assessment against the planning scheme

 

Impact assessment

This application is subject to Impact Assessment and is assessed against the relevant provisions of the planning scheme, including any relevant codes. The provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 [SPA] may be summarized: s313 provides that the assessment manager must carry out the impact assessment having regard to—

(a)  the State planning regulatory provisions;

(b)  the regional plan for a designated region, to the extent it is not identified in the planning scheme as being appropriately reflected in the planning scheme;

(c)  any applicable codes, other than concurrence agency codes the assessment manager does not apply, that are identified as a code for IDAS under this or another Act;

(d)  State planning policies, to the extent the policies are not

(i)   any relevant regional plan as being appropriately reflected in the regional plan; or

(ii)  the planning scheme as being appropriately reflected in the planning scheme;

(e)  any applicable codes in the following instruments—

(i)   a structure plan;

(ii)  a master plan;

(iii) a temporary local planning instrument;

(iv) a preliminary approval to which section 242 applies;

(v)  a planning scheme;

(f)   if the assessment manager is an infrastructure provider—the priority infrastructure plan.

 

There is no conflict with these provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009. 

 

Proposed use, with conditions, is not in conflict with planning scheme

Although the planning scheme requires Impact Assessment for the proposed use, there is no conflict with the intent of the Roma Town Planning Scheme. The proposed development will provide for additional accommodation opportunities within the Commercial Precinct, and will, with conditions, not conflict with the commercial and retail character of the surrounding area.

 

Desired Environmental Outcomes

The Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEOs) are based on ecological sustainability established by IPA and are the basis for the measures of the planning scheme.  Compliance is outlined below:

 

(a)  Environment

 

(i)   The areas of high scenic amenity, remnant vegetation, wetlands, fauna habitats and wildlife corridors and regionally significant open space in the town are protected.

 

The proposal will incorporate landscaping along both site frontages, which when combined with the awning, will maintain the visual amenity of the site as viewed from the street.  The subject site is not in proximity to any environmentally significant areas, including wetlands, habitats, corridors and open spaces, and the proposed development will not adversely impact the natural environment. 

 

(ii)  Places, areas or sites identified as being susceptible to land degradation, including contamination, erosion, salinity and landslip, are protected and further degradation is minimised.

 

The subject site is not identified as being susceptible to land degradation and therefore will not be adversely impacted by contamination, erosion, salinity or landslip. 

 

(iii) Ecological sustainability is achieved by maintaining and improving biodiversity, water and air quality.

 

The proposed development is located within an established urban area and will not adversely impact on biodiversity, water or air quality. 

 

(iv) Places of historical and indigenous cultural heritage and social significance are protected, maintained and enhanced.

 

The site is not identified as being in proximity to a place of historical, cultural or social significance.  However, the site did contain a building with considerable heritage character which provided an entrance statement to the main commercial/retail street of Roma. 

 

Negotiations with the applicant did not seek to replicate the historical design of the previous building, rather attempted to avoid having, what would be a long standing development, incorporate some elements of design and community amenity that would set a precedent for future redevelopment in the principle centre of the Maranoa Regional Council area.

 

http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2494/3973881646_a16d6e89e7_z.jpg?zz=1

Figure 4 - previous building on the subject site.

 

(b)  Economic

 

(i)   Business and commercial development shall be located within the Commercial Zone to promote and strengthen the existing central Business District.

 

The proposal will provide additional accommodation options for itinerant workers and tourists. The use will be located in the Commercial Zone, which is consistent with the preferred location of Motels.

 

(ii)  The Central Business District (CBD) or inner core of the Commercial Zone is intended to contain the more intensive commercial uses.  Entertainment facilities and tourist accommodation will also be favoured within and adjacent to the CBD to provide a central focus of activity and promote vitality after office hours.

 

The proposal is for a Motel in the Commercial Zone, in close proximity to the CBD. The development will be two storeys and a maximum of 7.4 metres in height to reflect the higher intensity of commercial uses expected in the inner core of the Commercial Zone, and in particular tourist accommodation facilities.

 

(iii) Beautification and improved parking facilities will enhance the efficiency, attractions and vitality of the Town CBD.

 

The proposed development will, with conditions, incorporate landscaping screening and features to enhance the aesthetics of a prominent corner site in the Roma CBD. Landscaping is proposed along both site frontages to maintain the visual amenity of the site as viewed from the street.  A number of architectural elements are also proposed to ensure the development enhances the visual amenity of the area, including windows and balconies facing the street, articulation and indentations in the building facade, and a footpath awning along the full frontages of the site to enhance pedestrian amenity along these streets.  The development also incorporates 26 on-site car parks to cater for the parking demand of the residents and visitors to the site and minimise on-street parking.

 

(iv) Tourism will be promoted with significant economic and social benefits to the town as a regional centre with close association with the oil and gas industry and the proximity of the Carnarvon National Park.

 

The proposed development will support both tourism and resource industries by providing accommodation opportunities for itinerant workers and tourists visiting Roma.  In addition the proposed conditions will ensure the iconic awing in the main street is maintained for the increased amenity of tourists.

 

(v)  Industry, business and employment opportunities are improved and appropriately located to service the community and region, and encourage economic activity within the local area.

 

The proposed development will support the growth of the town as a regional centre, which will increase the town’s potential to capitalise on the economic and social benefits of tourism. 

 

(c)  Community Well-Being & Lifestyle

 

(i)   Convenient access to roads and services is achieved through well located land uses and the efficient use and timely provision of infrastructure such as water, sewerage and roads walkways and cycling facilities.

 

The proposed development is located in an established urban area and has convenient access to roads, services and appropriate infrastructure. 

 

(ii)  Infrastructure networks such as road and rail, water cycle and electricity infrastructure are protected from encroachment by sensitive land uses which may adversely affect or limit the normal operation of that infrastructure.

 

The proposed development gains access from Quintin Street, which is a State-controlled road.  A landscaped strip and 1.8 metre high fence is proposed along both frontages of the site to buffer the proposed development from the street.  Access to the site is via a new 6.8 metre wide crossover from Quintin Street.  DTMR are a Concurrence Agency for the proposed development and have imposed conditions to address the impact of the development on road corridors (refer to Appendix 4).

 

(iii)  Rural residential and urban residential development occurs in distinct localities that provide a sense of community, amenity, services, and a safe, affordable living environment, whilst maintaining the rural amenity of the Town Area.

 

The proposed development is for a Motel, which is considered to be a commercial use. The proposed development is located in the Commercial Zone and will not encroach on rural or urban residential areas.

 

(iv) The adverse effects from natural and other hazards, including bushfires are minimised.

 

The site is not subject to natural or other hazards and is located within the Town Centre. 

 

(v)  The range of housing types, services and facilities meets the needs of the community and other uses.

 

The proposal is for a Motel consisting of 25 units and a manager’s residence. The development will contribute to the range of housing options available in Roma by providing accommodation for itinerant works and tourists.

 

(vi)  Community well being is not compromised by inappropriate development that impacts upon noise levels, traffic volume, lighting levels, local amenity.

 

The proposal is for a Motel in the Roma Town Area.  A total of 26 car parking spaces have been provided on the site to reduce the potential impact of on-street car parking in Quintin and McDowall Streets.  The proposed development is defined as a commercial use in the Commercial Zone and does not adjoin noise sensitive development.  The bulk and scale of the proposed development, with conditions, is considered to be consistent with the intended intensity of development in the CBD, with the proposed buildings having a maximum height of 2 storeys and 7.4 metres above ground level.  

 

Overall Outcomes for Urban Area Code

The Urban Area Code identifies overall outcomes providing direction about relevant assessment issues.  The overall outcomes for the Urban Area Code are the purpose of the code.  The overall outcomes sought for the Urban Area are the following:

 

(a)   Roma is a focus for a range of business, industrial, tourist, community and recreational activity in the local government area.

 

The proposed development will support the expansion of business, industrial, tourist, community and recreation activity in the local government area by providing accommodation opportunities for itinerant workers and tourists.

 

(b)   Business and commercial development is located primarily in the CBD to provide central and accessible services to the local government area.

 

The proposal is for a Motel, which is considered a commercial use, and will be located in the Commercial Zone of the Roma CBD.

 

(c)   The residential and heritage character and amenity of the Urban Area is retained.

 

The proposed development is for a Motel of 25 units and a manager’s residence.  The bulk and scale of the proposed development from Quintin and McDowall Streets is considered to be consistent with the intended intensity of development in the CBD, with all buildings limited to 2 storeys and a maximum of 7.4 metres in height. 

 

(d)   Safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists is maintained and enhanced.

 

The proposed development will maintain a high level of amenity along pedestrian pathways at the Quintin and McDowall Street frontages of the site through landscaping, footpath awnings and appropriately located and safe vehicle access.

 

(e)   Residential (including Rural Residential) development occurs where there is no adverse impact on Good Quality Agricultural Land.

 

The site is not located in proximity to Good Quality Agricultural Land.

 

(f)    Residential development is buffered from the existing and proposed road and rail corridors to minimise any detrimental impact.

 

The proposed Motel is considered a commercial use.  Nevertheless the proposed development incorporates landscaping, awnings and fencing along the frontages of the site to buffer the development from Quintin and McDowall Streets to the east and south respectively.

 

(g)   Residential development accommodates a range of housing types and allotment sizes, and provides a safe and pleasant living environment, with adequate access to community services and is located in the residential preferred areas shown on the Urban Area Maps in the appendices.

 

The proposed development is for a Motel and is considered a commercial use. The development will nevertheless provide additional accommodation options for itinerant works and tourists.  The site is in close proximity to community services and facilities in the Roma Town Centre.

 

(h)   The expansion of residential development occurs in areas where it is most cost effective to supply physical infrastructure, such as water, sewerage, roads and electricity.

 

The site is currently well serviced by physical infrastructure, such as water, sewerage, roads and electricity.

 

(i)    Efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure, such as schools, neighbourhood shopping, community services, public transport services, and parks are provided in residential areas.

 

The proposal is located in a well established commercial area with efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure.

 

(j)    Industrial development is located in the Industrial Zone of the town (see maps in appendices).

 

The proposal is not for industrial development.

 

(k)   Impacts of industrial uses are required to be within acceptable limits and uses are undertaken in a sustainable manner consistent with the amenity and character of the area concerned.

 

The proposal is not for industrial development.

 

(l)    Small scale business, community and emergency services are provided for the needs of the local community.

 

The proposed development is for a Motel that will provide accommodation options for itinerant workers and tourists visiting Roma. This will also contribute to the growth of small scale businesses.

 

(m) All Areas other than the Commercial Zone are protected from shopping centre and other forms of commercial development.

 

The proposal is for a Motel in a Commercial Zone, and is considered an appropriate use for the area.  It will accommodate more visitors in walking distance to the retail hub of Roma and, with conditions, maintain the retail character of the commercial area.

 

 

The Code’s relevant Performance Criteria are shown below, in order to more easily permit structured and detailed consideration of relevant issues—

 

Urban Area Code

 

Performance Criteria

Assessment responses

A.   A. For all the Town Zone

1. Infrastructure

PC 1 Electricity

Premises are provided with a supply of electricity adequate for the activity.

The proposed development is in a well established urban area and is provided with electricity infrastructure.

PC 2 Water Supply

Premises are provided with an adequate volume and supply of water for the activity.

The proposed development is in a well established urban area and is provided with water supply.  As part of the Building approval process the developer will be required to demonstrate adequate water pressure and volume for fire fighting purposes.

PC 3 Effluent Disposal

To ensure that public health and environmental values are preserved, all premises provide for the treatment and disposal of effluent and other waste water.

The proposed development is in an established urban area and is provided with sewerage infrastructure.  The Engineering Services Report prepared by RMA Engineers confirms that the sewage system has sufficient capacity to service the development.

PC 4 Stormwater/Inter-Allotment Drainage

Stormwater is collected and discharged so as to:

(a) protect the stability of buildings or the use adjacent land;

(b) prevent the water-logging of nearby land; and

(c) protect and maintain environmental values.

The Engineering Assessment Report prepared by RMA Engineers proposes all stormwater runoff be discharged to the existing infrastructure along Quintin and McDowall Streets.  A 20,000L underground rainwater tank is also proposed to allow water reuse for irrigation and non-potable internal uses.

 

PC 5 Vehicle Access

Vehicle access is provided to a standard appropriate for the use.

The proposed development will obtain access to Quintin Street via a 6.8 metre wide driveway crossover, constructed in accordance with the CMDG.

PC 6 Density

The density of residential activities does not impact adversely on the residential amenity of the town.

Not Applicable – The proposed development is not for a Dwelling House.

 

PC 7 Parking and Manoeuvring

Vehicle parking and service vehicle provision is adequate for the use whilst ensuring both safe and functional operation for motorists and pedestrians.

The proposed development includes a total of 26 car parking spaces, including 2 spaces for disabled persons, in compliance with Schedule 2: Standards for roads, car parking, access and manoeuvring areas.  A designated bus parking space is not proposed as the intended users of the Motel will be travellers/workers who have their own vehicles.  Bus standing is proposed over vacant car parking spaces along the northern boundary of the site.

PC 8 Roads

All weather road access is provided between the premises and the existing road network.

The proposed driveway will be developed to a standard that provides for all weather road access between the premises and the existing road network.

PC 9 State Controlled Roads

State Controlled Roads are maintained and enhanced as a link between major centres.

Access to the site will be via a new driveway crossover from Quintin Street, which is a state-controlled road.  A Traffic Impact Assessment has been prepared by RMA Engineers concluding that the generated traffic volumes and proposed left in/left out access will not cause any risk or hazard to traffic movements along Quintin Street. 

 

DTMR have issued conditions as a concurrence agency for this application (refer to Appendix 4).  

PC 10 Development Adjacent to State Controlled Roads

Development adjacent to State Controlled Roads is located to ensure safe and efficient use of the highway and maintain the integrity of the highway as a commuter link.

The proposed development has frontage to Quintin and McDowall Streets, with Quintin Street being a state-controlled road.  Adverse impacts to the road network will be minimised through the provision of landscaping and fencing along both frontages, and an adequately designed and sited crossover to Quintin Street.

 

A truncation has been provided for the use of DTMR for better traffic management purposes.

PC 11 Noise Sensitive Development

Noise sensitive developments (residential, education and community) must ensure that road traffic noise levels are appropriately managed to achieve acceptable levels of amenity.

The proposed development is for a Motel, which is not classed as a Noise Sensitive Development.

 

DTMR have imposed conditions for this development.

PC 12 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome

Development

(a)  does not adversely affect the operation of the aerodrome;

(b)  is designed and located to achieve a suitable standard of amenity for the proposed activity; and

(c)  does not restrict the future operational demands of the aerodrome.

Not Applicable - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome.

PC 13 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome

The development of premises does not cause an obstruction or other potential hazard to aircraft movement associated with the aerodrome by way of:

(a)  the physical intrusion of buildings or other structures into the Obstacle Limitation Surface;

(b)  attracting birds or bats to the area which could cause or contribute to bird strike hazard;

(c)  providing very bright lighting or lighting similar to aerodrome lighting which can distract or confuse pilots;

(d)  interfering with navigation or communication facilities;

(e)  emissions that may affect pilot visibility or aircraft operations; or

(f)   transient intrusions into the aerodromes operation space.

Not Applicable - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome.

PC 14 Gas and Oil Pipelines

Buildings are located at an appropriate distance from pipelines to ensure community safety and operation of the use is not compromised.

The subject site is within an established urban area and is located at an appropriate distance from pipelines.

PC 15 Refuse Tips and Effluent Treatment Plants

Premises are located at an appropriate distance from refuse tips and effluent treatment plants to ensure community safety and operation of the uses are not compromised.

The subject site is not within proximity to refuse tips and effluent treatment plants.

PC 16 Rail Corridors

Development is at an appropriate distance from the rail corridor so as not to prejudice safety, speed or intended role of the existing and proposed rail corridors.

The site is not located in close proximity to rail corridors.

PC 17 Noise Attenuation

Development adjoining the rail corridor is protected from the impact of noise.

2. Environment

PC 18 Watercourses

Development ensures the maintenance of riparian areas and water quality including protection from off-site transfer of sediment.

Not Applicable – The site is not located in proximity to any watercourses.

PC 19 Protected Areas

Development is undertaken to ensure areas of significant biodiversity and habitat value are protected.

Not Applicable – The proposed development is not in close proximity to any areas of significant biodiversity and habitat value.

PC 20 Flooding

Premises are designed and located so as:

(a) not to adversely impacted upon by flooding;

(b) to protect life and property; and

(c) not to have an undesirable impact of the extent and magnitude of flooding.  

The site is not mapped as being affected by a 1 in 100 year flooding event.

 

PC 21 Air Emissions

Air emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses.

The proposed development will not cause environmental harm or nuisance from air emissions.

PC 22 Noise Emissions

Noise emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses.

The proposed development is for a Motel of 25 units and a manager’s residence and is expected to generate negligible noise emissions.  The site does not adjoin any sensitive land uses.

PC 23 Water Quality

The standard of effluent and/or stormwater runoff from premises ensures the quality of surface water is suitable for:

(a) the biological integrity of aquatic ecosystems;

(b) recreational use;

(c) supply as drinking water after minimal treatment;

(d) agricultural use; or

Industrial use; and

(e) Minimises nuisance or harm to adjoining land owners.

Appropriate water quality treatment devices will be included in the stormwater collection and dispersal system.  This will be included as a condition of the approval.

PC 24 Excavation and Filling

Excavation and filling of land ensures:

(a) that both the amenity and safety of users of the site and adjacent land holdings; and

(b) soil erosion is kept to a minimum with remedial works.

Excavation and filling will be undertaken in accordance with Schedule 7 - Standards for Construction Activity

PC 25 Construction Activities

Both erosion control and silt collection measures are undertaken so as to ensure protection of environmental values during construction.

Erosion controls and silt collection measures will be implemented during construction to ensure protection of environmental values.

PC 26 Bushfire Hazard Area

Development maintains the safety of people and property by avoiding areas of high or Medium Bushfire hazard or mitigating the risk through:

(a)  the siting of buildings ensuring setbacks from hazardous vegetation are maximised and elements lease susceptible to fire are sited closest to the bushfire hazard; and

(b)  the provision of firebreaks to ensure adequate setbacks between Buildings, structures and Hazardous vegetation.

The proposed development is not located within an area of High or Medium Bushfire Hazard.

PC 27 Character Buildings

Development adjacent to buildings identified as heritage or character buildings within Schedule 9 incorporates design features, materials and details that blend with the existing character of the adjoining buildings and/or place.

 

The site is not identified as being in proximity to a place of historical, cultural or social significance listed on any heritage register.  However, the site did contain a building with considerable heritage character which provided an entrance statement to the main commercial/retail street of Roma. 

 

Negotiations with the applicant did not seek to replicate the historical design of the previous building, rather attempted to avoid having, what would be a long standing development, incorporate some elements of design and community amenity that would set a precedent for future redevelopment in the principle centre of the Maranoa Regional Council area.

 

It should be noted that no pre-lodgement meeting to discuss design elements where held with the council.

PC 20 Cultural Heritage

The significance of known places of indigenous and/or cultural heritage value is retained.

Not Applicable – The site is not in proximity to known places of indigenous and/or cultural heritage value.

B.  B. For the Residential Zone –

C.  a) Residential Development – Dwelling House, Dual occupancy and Accommodation Units

PC 29-36

 

Not Applicable – The site is in the Commercial Zone.

i. C. For the Commercial Zone

PC 37 Character

The commercial area is enhanced with uses of a business nature or those which complement the commercial and retail character of the town centre.

The proposed development is for a Motel, which will provide short term accommodation for itinerant workers and tourists within the Roma CBD.  The site adjoins similar commercial uses and the proposed Motel, with the proposed conditions, is considered to complement the commercial and retail character of the town centre.  This is also consistent with the policy position in the draft Maranoa Regional Council Planning Scheme.

PC 38 Streetscape

Buildings and structures within the commercial area compliment the architectural character of the streetscape.

The proposed development is to incorporate landscaping and awnings along the McDowall Street and Quintin Street frontages of the site, to complement the architectural character and enhance the streetscapes. 

PC 39 Amenity

The operation of commercial activities is not unduly affected by the proximity of residential dwellings.

N/A – The site does not adjoin land used for residential purposes.

PC 40 Scale

Development is at a scale which protects the amenity of the area.

The total use area of the proposed development is 1,145 square metres, or 74% of the site area.  The proposed site cover is 37%.  This is considered to be acceptable as the site is located in the Roma CBD and is adjoined to the north and west by commercial uses.  The site is a corner allotment and has frontage to a well established road network, being Quintin and McDowall Streets.  It is noted that provision has been made for adequate car parking spaces and landscaping along both frontages of the site.

 

The site has an area of 1,545 square metres.

 

The Motel building is limited to 2 storeys and 7.4 metres in height.

 

PC 41 Setbacks and Boundary Clearances

Buildings and Structures are located to ensure the local character and streetscape are protected and enhanced.

The Motel has sufficient front boundary setbacks, to ensure that the character of the streetscape is protected through sufficient landscaping and fencing.  The Motel is built to the western side boundary, however this is considered to be an acceptable outcome in keeping with the character of the Commercial Zone.

 

PC 42 Lighting

Lighting is designed in a manner to ensure ongoing amenity and safety in the commercial area whilst ensuring surrounding areas are protected from undue glare or lighting overspill.

Lighting will not exceed 8.0 lux at 1.5 metres from beyond the site boundary.

PC 43 Landscaping

Landscaping is designed and established in a manner which achieves high quality frontage and contributes positively to the streetscape character.  It is located to avoid interference with electricity infrastructure items and provides for maintenance access to any on site public utility infrastructure.

Landscaped areas along both site frontages will be established to enhance the visual amenity of the site and contribute positively to the streetscape character.  The proposed landscaping will not interfere with electricity infrastructure or on site public utility infrastructure.

PC 44 Operating Hours

Development is operated in such a manner that ensures that the local amenity is protected.

N/A – The site does not adjoin sensitive land uses.

PC 45 Delivery of Goods

The loading and unloading of goods occurs at the appropriate times to protect the amenity of the Industrial Area and surrounding areas.

The site does not adjoin sensitive land uses.  No unloading or loading will occur on Sundays or public holidays.

ii.            D. For the Industrial Zone

PC 47-55

Not Applicable – The subject site is located within the Commercial Zone.

iii.           E. For the Open Space and Recreation Zone

PC 56-62

Not Applicable – The subject site is located within the Commercial Zone.

F. For the Rural Residential Zone

PC 63-64

Not Applicable – The subject site is located within the Commercial Zone.

G. For the Special Uses Zone

PC 65-67

Not Applicable – The subject site is located within the Commercial Zone.

G.  H. Specific Land Uses

PC 68-70 - Caretaker’s Residence

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

PC 71-74 - Community Use

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

PC 75-77 - Home Based Business

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

PC78-81 - Host Home Accommodation

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

PC 82 - Service Station

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

PC 83 - Telecommunication Facility 

Not Applicable – The proposed development is for a Motel.

 

 


 

Submissions

Public Notification was carried out from 27 May 2013 to 18 June 2013.  No submissions were lodged to Council during this period.

 

Other assessment issues

Subsequent approval for Building Works and Plumbing and Drainage Works will be required. 

 

The Department of Transport and Main Roads response dated 4 March 2013 includes conditions, which will form part of the approval (refer Attachment 4)

 


Attachment 2

Development Plans

 









Attachment 3

Easement Plan

 


Attachment 4

Department of Transport and Main Roads Conditions

 













Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 

 

 

 

Development Assessment: Trunk Infrastructure Charges

 

 

Material Change of Use (Motel-25 Units plus a Manager’s residence) and Reconfiguring a Lot (Access Easement) located at 129-131 McDowall Street, Roma, Qld – Lot 2 on RP60707

 

 

Plan Associates

 

 

 

 

 


Executive Summary

 

1.   The Sustainable Planning Act, 2009 requires local governments to prepare Priority Infrastructure Plans (PIP) and adopt and charge for trunk infrastructure in accordance with the State planning regulatory provision, 2012 (adopted charges).

 

2.   The Council adopted trunk infrastructure charges resolutions towards the end of 2011, amended in September 2012.

 

3.   An adopted infrastructure charge of $202,500-00 is payable in respect of the proposed development.

 

The adopted infrastructure has been calculated in accordance with the following formula:

 

AIC = AC –D

 

Where:

 

AIC is the adopted infrastructure charge that may be levied for development;

 

AC is the adopted charge for the trunk infrastructure networks to service the development stated in Table 2 of the Council’s adopted infrastructure charges resolutions; and

 

D is the discount for the trunk infrastructure networks servicing the premises.

 

As such, the following apply to the application:

 

a.   An adopted charge of $7,500-00 per one to two bed roomed units for Accommodation (short term) apply.

 

The proposal is for a motel comprising of 25 one and two bedroom units.

 

This equates to:

 25 X $7,500-00

= $187,500-00

 

In addition, a 2 bedroom caretaker’s/managers residence is proposed.

 

This equates to:

 1 X $15,000-00

= $15,000-00

 

Total charges of $202,500-00 ($187,500-00 plus $15,000-00) apply.

 

b.   Unless it can be demonstrated a monetary contribution in respect of the subject property for trunk infrastructure have been made under an adopted charges resolution, and infrastructure charges agreement, head works charges, a condition or conditions  imposed by the Council or another charging mechanism a discount does not apply to the application.

 

AIC      =          $202,500-00 - $0-00

 

            =          $202,500-00

 

4.   A work sheet detailing the methodology used to calculate the charge is in Attachment 1.

 

5.   An extract from the resolution of Council to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under Division 2.5 of Draft state regulatory provision (adopted charges) is in Attachment 2.


Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 

Attachment 1

 

 

Trunk Infrastructure Charges Worksheet

 

 

1.   Situational Analysis

 

Step 1: Determine whether the proposed development is located within the Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA).

 

Refer to Map 1 of the Roma Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (Attached).

 

The subject property is located within the Roma PIA of the Roma Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution.

 

Step 2: Determine what infrastructure networks are covered.

 

Refer to the Plans for Trunk Infrastructure attached to the Roma Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (Attached).

 

The Council provides all five infrastructure networks identified in the plans for trunk infrastructure to the proposed development.

 

Step 3: Determine the land use class of the proposed development.

 

Refer to Table 1 of the Roma Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution (Attached).

 

Under the Roma planning scheme the proposal is for:

 

1.   A Motel with one and two bedroom units. This translates into the Accommodation (Short Term) land use class under the State Planning Regulatory Provision.

2.   Managers/Caretakers residence with two bedrooms. This translates into the 1 to 2 bedroom dwelling land use class under the State Planning Regulatory Provision.

 

Step 4: Determine whether the proponent may be entitled to a credit.

 

Under the September, 2012 resolution of the Council any discount for applications other than proposals for development under the residential adopted infrastructure charge category will only apply where:  

a.   It can be demonstrated a monetary contribution in respect of the subject property for trunk infrastructure equal to the discount have been made under an adopted charges resolution, and infrastructure charges agreement, head works charges, a condition or conditions  imposed by the Council or another charging mechanism; or

b.   the development entails a change in the relevant adopted infrastructure charges category under Table 2 of the resolution.

 

The resolution also states that, to remove any doubt a discount will not apply to a development proposal in the Industrial, Commercial, Special Uses and Open Space and Recreation Zones unless the conditions (a) and (b) have been met.

The premise is in the Commercial Zone and is currently vacant. However, the site previously contained a Hotel (the existing lawful use of the premises). As such, the development of the premises for a Motel does not entail a change in the relevant adopted infrastructure charges category under Table 2 of the resolution.

 

Unless it can be demonstrated a monetary contribution in respect of the subject property for trunk infrastructure have been made under an adopted charges resolution, and infrastructure charges agreement, head works charges, a condition or conditions  imposed by the Council or another charging mechanism a discount does not apply to the application.

 

3.   Calculating the Charge

 

The adopted infrastructure charge levied for each trunk infrastructure networks must be calculated in accordance with the following formula-

 

AIC = AC –D

 

Where:

 

AIC is the adopted infrastructure charge that may be levied for development;

 

AC is the adopted charge for the trunk infrastructure networks to service the development stated in stated in Table 2 of the resolutions; and

 

D is the discount for the trunk infrastructure networks servicing the premises.

 

As such, the following will apply to the application:

 

Step 5: Determine Demand (the total number of adopted charge units generated by the proposed development).

 

Refer to Table 2 of the resolution.

 

An adopted charge of $7,500-00 per unit for 1 or 2 bedroom Accommodation (short term) apply.

 

The proposal is for a motel comprising of 25 one a two bedroom units.

 

This equates to:

 25 X $7,500-00

= $187,500-00

In addition, a 2 bedroom caretaker’s/managers residence is proposed.

 

This equates to:

 1 X $15,000-00

= $15,000-00

 

Total charges of $202,500-00 ($187,500-00 plus $15,000-00) apply.

 

Step 6: Determine Demand Credit (any discount for existing lawful uses in accordance with Section 5 of the Adopted Charges Resolution of the Roma PIA).

 

A discount does not apply in respect of the proposed development.

 

Step 7: Calculate the Adopted Infrastructure Charge.

 

 

AIC      =          $202,500-00 - $0-00

 

            =          $202,500-00


Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 

Attachment 2

 

Extract from resolution to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under Division 2.5 of Draft state regulatory provision (adopted charges)

1.   When resolution has effect

 

This resolution has effect on and from 26 September, 2012.

2.   Priority infrastructure area

 

The priority infrastructure area for the Roma planning scheme of the Maranoa Regional Council is identified in the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges).

3.   Comparison of planning scheme use categories and SPRP charge categories

 

To assist in applying the adopted infrastructure charges schedule in schedule 1 of the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) 2012, Table 1 provides a guide to the uses under the planning scheme that come within the uses mentioned in column 2 of the adopted infrastructure charges schedule.

Table 1 - Planning scheme use categories and SPRP charge categories

Current planning scheme use categories

 

 

SPRP charge categories

 

 

Residential

Dwelling House, Dwelling Unit

Dwelling house

Caretakers Residence

Caretaker’s accommodation

Accommodation Unit, Multiple Dwelling Units, Apartment Houses

Multiple dwelling

Dual Occupancy

Dual occupancy

Accommodation (short term)

Hotel, Motel

Hotel

Temporary Accommodation, Host Home Accommodation

Short-term accommodation

Caravan Park, Camping Ground

Tourist park

Accommodation (long term)

Accommodation Units

Community residence

Accommodation Units, Rooming Unit

Hostel

Caravan Park

Relocatable home park

Retirement Village, Accommodation Units

Retirement facility

Places of assembly

Community Orientated Use

Club

Community Orientated Use

Community use

Community Orientated Use

Function facility

Community Orientated Use

Funeral parlour

Place of worship

Place of worship

Commercial (bulk goods)

Showroom, Storage Facility, Warehouse

Agricultural supplies store

Showroom, Storage Facility, Warehouse

Bulk landscape supplies

Showroom, Storage Facility, Warehouse

Garden centre

Showroom, Storage Facility, Warehouse

Hardware and trade supplies

Showroom, Storage Facility

Outdoor sales

Showroom

Showroom

Commercial (retail)

Shop

Adult store

Catering Shop, Food Outlet, Restaurant

Food and drink outlet

Shop

Service industry

Service Station

Service station

Shop

Shop

Shopping Centre

Shopping centre

Commercial (office)

Professional Office

Office

N/A

Sales office

Education facility

Child Care Centre, Child Orientated Uses

Child care centre

Community Orientated Uses

Community care centre

Educational establishment

Educational establishment

Entertainment

N/A

Hotel (non-residential component)

N/A

Theatre

N/A

Nightclub

Indoor sport and recreational facility

Indoor Recreation

Indoor sport and recreation

Industry

Low Impact Industry

Low impact industry

Medium Impact Industry

Medium impact industry

Industry

Research and technology industry

Industry

Rural industry

Warehouse

Warehouse

N/A

Waterfront and marine industry

High impact industry

Noxious or Offensive Industry

Noxious and hazardous industries

High Impact Industry

High impact industry

Low impact rural

N/A

Animal husbandry

Agriculture

Cropping

Forestry

Permanent plantations

N/A

Wind farm

High impact rural

Intensive Animal Industry

Aquaculture

Intensive Animal Industry

Intensive animal industries

N/A

Intensive horticulture

N/A

Wholesale nursery

N/A

Winery

Essential services

N/A

Correctional facility

N/A

Emergency services

Health Care Premises

Health care services

N/A

Hospital

N/A

Residential care facility

N/A

Veterinary services

Specialised uses

Transport Terminal

Air services

N/A

Animal keeping

Off Street Car Park

Car park

N/A

Crematorium

N/A

Major sport recreation and entertainment facility

N/A

Motor sport

Park

Outdoor sport and recreation

N/A

Port services

Tourist Facility

Tourist attraction

Public Utility

Utility installation

Extractive Industry

Extractive industry

Accommodation Units

Non-residential workforce accommodation

Minor uses

N/A

Advertising device

N/A

Cemetery

Home Based Office

Home based business

N/A

Landing

N/A

Market

N/A

Roadside stalls

Telecommunications Facility

Telecommunications facility

N/A

Temporary use

Park

Park

N/A

Outdoor lighting

 


Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 

4.   Adopted infrastructure charges

 

The Maranoa Regional Council resolves to adopt the charges mentioned in table 2, column 3, for development for a use mentioned in table 2, column 2.

The local government declares that an adopted infrastructure charge in table 2, column 3, applies to that part of the local government area mentioned for that charge in table 2, column 4.

The area in which the adopted infrastructure charge applies is identified in Map 1: Roma PIA.

Table 2 – Adopted infrastructure charge

·             

1 or 2 bedroom dwelling

  Column 1

Adopted infrastructure charge category

Column 2

Use

Column 3

Adopted infrastructure charges

 

Column 4

Part of Local Government Area (LGA) to which charge applies

Residential

 

 

·              Dwelling house

·              Caretaker’s accommodation

·              Multiple dwelling

·              Dual occupancy

 

 

Adopted infrastructure charge                                 

Adopted infrastructure charges for stormwater network

Map1: Roma PIA

$15,000 per dwelling unit

N/A

 

·              Dwelling house

·              Caretaker’s accommodation

·              Multiple dwelling

·              Dual occupancy

$21,000 per dwelling unit

 

3 or more bedroom dwelling 

N/A

Map1: Roma PIA

Accommodation (short term)

·              Hotel

·              Short-term accommodation

·              Tourist park

For a tent or caravan site in a tourist park:

$7,500

per 1 or 2 tent/caravan sites

or

$10,500

per 3 tent or caravan sites

 

N/A

Map1: Roma PIA

For a cabin in a tourist park:

$7,500

per cabin with 1 or 2 bedrooms

or

$10,500

per cabin with 3 or more bedrooms

Map1: Roma PIA

 

For a hotel or short-term accommodation:

 $7,500

per suite (with 1 or 2 bedrooms)

or

$10,500

per suite (with 3 or more bedrooms)

or

$7,500

per bedroom (for a bedroom that is not within a suite)

 

Map1: Roma PIA

Accommodation (long term)

 

·              Community residence

·              Hostel

·              Relocatable home park

·              Retirement facility

 

For a relocatable home park:

$15,000

per 1 or 2 bedroom relocatable dwelling site

or

$21,000

per 3 or more bedroom relocatable dwelling site

N/A

Map1: Roma PIA

Map1: Roma PIA

 

For a community residence, retirement facility or hostel:

$15,000

per suite (with 1 or 2 bedrooms)

or

$21,000

per suite (with 3 or more bedrooms)

or

$15,000

bedroom (for a bedroom that is not within a suite)

 

Map1: Roma PIA

Places of assembly

 

·              Place of worship

 

$50

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Commercial (bulk goods)

 

·              Agricultural supplies store

·              Bulk landscape supplies

·              Garden centre

·              Hardware and trade supplies

·              Outdoor sales

·              Showroom

$100

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Commercial (retail)

 

·              Adult store

·              Food and drink outlet

·              Service industry

·              Service station

·              Shop

·              Shopping centre

 

$135

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Commercial (office)

 

·              Office

·              Sales office

$100

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Education facility

 

·              Child care centre

·              Community care centre

·              Educational establishment

$100

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Indoor sport and recreational facility

 

·              Indoor sport and recreation

 

$150

per m2 of GFA, court areas at $10 per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Industry

 

·              Low impact industry

·              Medium impact industry

·              Research and technology industry

·              Rural industry

·              Warehouse

·              Waterfront and marine industry

$35

per m2 of GFA 

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

High impact industry

 

·              Noxious and hazardous

$50

per m2 of GFA

$7-50 per impervious m2

Map1: Roma PIA

Low impact rural

 

·              Animal husbandry

·              Cropping

·              Permanent plantations

Wind farms

 

High impact rural

 

·              Intensive animal industries

·              Intensive horticulture

$15

per m2 of GFA

 

N/A

Map1: Roma PIA

Specialised uses

 

·              Air services

·              Car park

·              Major sport, recreation and entertainment facility

·              Non-resident workforce accommodation

·              Outdoor sport and recreation

·              Tourist attraction

·              Utility installation

·              Extractive industry

The adopted infrastructure charge is the charge (in column 3) for the charge category (in column 1) that the local government determines should apply for the use at the time of assessment.

 

Minor uses

 

·              Home-based business

·              Park

Nil charge

Any other use

A use not otherwise listed in column 2, including a use that is unknown because the development application does not specify a proposed use

The adopted infrastructure charge is the charge (in column 3) for the charge category (in column 1) that the local government determines should apply for the use at the time of assessment.

 


Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 

 

5.   Discounts

 

The charge for development is to be discounted to take into account the existing usage of trunk infrastructure by the premises on or in relation to which the development is carried out.

Discounts are to be calculated using the following method.

The adopted infrastructure charge is to be calculated using the following formula:

AIC = AC –D

Where:

·     AIC is the adopted infrastructure charge that may be levied for development;

·     AC is the adopted charge for the trunk infrastructure networks to service the development stated in stated in Table 2 of the resolutions; and

·     D is the discount for the trunk infrastructure networks servicing the premises.

 

(i) The discount is the greater of:

a.   the monetary equivalent of the existing lawful use of the premises, calculated using the adopted infrastructure charges in Table 2; and

b.   the monetary contributions for trunk infrastructure that have been previously made, escalated to present value by applying the movements of the Consumer Price Index (all Groups) for Brisbane between the date that the payment was made and 1 July 2012.

 

(ii) For applications other than proposals for development under the residential adopted infrastructure charge category the discount under (i) (a) and (b) will only apply where:           

c.   It can be demonstrated a monetary contribution in respect of the subject property for trunk infrastructure equal to the discount have been made under an adopted charges resolution, and infrastructure charges agreement, head works charges, a condition or conditions  imposed by the Council or another charging mechanism; or

d.   the development entails a change in the relevant adopted infrastructure charges category under Table 2 of the resolution.

 

(iii) To remove any doubt, it is stated that a discount will not apply to a development proposal in the Industrial, Commercial, Special Uses and Open Space and Recreation Zones unless the conditions under 5 (ii) (a) and (b) have been met.

(iv) Applications for development which are not serviced or planned to be serviced by the water supply or sewerage networks for trunk infrastructure will be discounted as follows:

·     Water supply network:                        30% of total charge

·     Sewerage network:                             20% of total charge

 

(v) The maximum amount of any discount allocated under this resolution is not to exceed the adopted infrastructure charges for the proposed development.

6.   Trunk infrastructure

 

Until a priority infrastructure plan is made —

§ the trunk infrastructure shown in Maps 2-6  is identified as the trunk infrastructure for the local government area

§ the trunk infrastructure network or trunk infrastructure networks to which the adopted infrastructure charge applies are – water supply, sewerage, stormwater, transport and parks and community facilities.

§ the standard of service for each network or network mentioned above is stated to be the standard set out in Attachment 1

 

7.   Indexing adopted infrastructure charges

 

The adopted charge for Roma planning scheme may be increased after the charge is levied and before it is paid to the local government.

The increase must be calculated using the following method:

·     the monetary contributions for trunk infrastructure that have been previously made, escalated to present value by applying the movements of the Consumer Price Index (all Groups) for Brisbane between the date that the payment was made and 1 July 2012.

 

8.   Dictionary           

 

Words and terms used in this resolution have the meaning given in the SPA or the Queensland Planning Provisions version 2.0.

If a word or term used in this resolution is not defined in the SPA or the Queensland Planning Provision version 2.0, it has the meaning given in the Roma planning scheme.

9.   Resolution attachments

 

·     Map 1: Roma PIA


Attachment 5

Infrastructure Charges Report

 


Attachment 1

DNRM Letter & Map - Lot A on CP882774 - Reserve for Grazing Purposes

 



      


Attachment 1

Roma CBD Advisory Committee Confirmed Minutes - 04.06.13

 

 

Meeting:                     Roma CBD Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                           4 June 2013

Chair:                          Cr. Cameron O’Neil               

Attendees:                 Justin Garvie, Kevin Chambers, Robert Nugent, Milly Chandler, Jacki Erickson, Ian Galloway, Gabrielle Barron,  Linette Chandler, Jim Scott, Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. Peter Flynn,  Kym Downey, Katrina Marsh, Tyson Golder.

 

 

Apologies                   Sarah Holt, Tony Klein, Gary Schefe.

Minutes:                     Kelly Rogers

 

Meeting Opened:     6.04pm                                                                              

Meeting Closed:       7.29pm

 

 

Next Meeting Details

 

Date:                           Tuesday 2 July 2013

Time:                          6.00pm

Location:                    Bassett Park Members Bar


 

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

2.0

Setting the scene & role of the Committee

That a list of concerns and wishes for redevelopment of the Roma CBD be forwarded to Kelly Rogers for collation prior to the next meeting.

All

26 June 2013

3.0

Terms of Reference

Terms of Reference definition of the Roma CBD to be amended to state:-

·      To the north until Bungil Street

·      To the south until Mayne Street

·      To the east until Charles Street

·      To the west until Feather Street

 

Update the “Quorum” definition to state:-

The minimum quorum shall be 7 members.

 

The amended draft Terms of Reference are to be circulated to members with the minutes in preparation for the next meeting.

Kelly Rogers

14 June 2013

All members review the draft Terms of Reference and provide feedback to Kelly Rogers for group consideration at the next meeting on 2 July 2013.

All

Kelly Rogers

26 June 2013

5.0

Regulated Cark Parking update

A copy of the Roma Car Parking Audit undertaken by Council be circulated to members.

Kelly Rogers

9 June 2013

Regulated Car Parking be included as an Agenda item for next meeting. 

Kelly Rogers

2 July 2013

6.0

General Business

Investigate Council’s ability to regulate and manage potential fire hazards identified in the Roma CBD.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Investigate Council’s ability to implement a separate rating charge on land zoned for commercial purposes where establishments that are not open to the public for trade.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Investigate the extent of Council’s authority in regulating designated smoking locations and litter of cigarette butts.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

Council consider clearly marking taxi ranks through better located signage and marking on the bitumen.

Cameron O’Neil

2 July 2013

 


 

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2              Setting the Scene and the Role of the Committee

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil, provided an overview of Council’s reasoning in formulating the Roma CBD Advisory Committee.  He further advised the group that the Roma Placemaking Strategy – October 2011, adopted by Council, forms the basis from which the committee can put forward their recommendations for amendments.   These recommendations will in turn be put to Council for formal consideration.  The Chair further clarified that the focus of the group is specifically around planning for redevelopment of the Roma CBD as defined under the documented “Terms of Reference.”

 

Attending members were provided a hard copy of the Maranoa Placemaking Strategy – Roma and the 2013 Local Plan - Roma , Muckadilla & Hodgson.

 

Each member was asked to introduce themselves, explain their motivation for joining the committee and speak about what they saw as a priority for the group.  A number of key priorities were identified, including:-

 

·     Addressing the number of and availability of car parking in the CBD;

·     A need to revitalise the town centre to make it an appealing place to establish a business and for shoppers ‘stop and shop;’

·     Reinstate a sense of friendly ‘Country Town’ character;

·     Build upon the town history (Australian flag, town clock, bottle trees) and art trail to create a vibrant culture that attracts tourists;

·     Create meeting points in the CBD (e.g. alfresco dining);

·     Make the town safe for pedestrians, including the elderly, through use of crossings and providing bus shelters.

 

Group reporting & outputs

Discussion was undertaken on formalising the frequency of reporting to Council and determination of a time line for formal submission of recommended amendments to the Roma Placemaking Strategy, pertaining to redevelopment of the Roma CBD.  A vote was taken by attending members, with all in favour of the following approach:-

 

Resolution Number RC.01.13

That:-

1.   The adopted Minutes of each committee meeting be formally reported to Council on a monthly basis;

2.   The committee submit to Council a listing of recommended changes to the Roma Placemaking plan by 1 December 2013;

3.   All formal requests to Council be put forward on behalf of the Committee by representing Councillor Committee members for formal submission to full Council.

 

CARRIED

 

 

Item 3              Draft Terms of Reference

 

A hard copy of the draft Terms of Reference was provided to attending members, a review undertaken, with some changes agreed.  These changes are detailed under the heading “Meeting Actions.”  It was also generally agreed by all present that any identified constraints be dealt with by the Chair on an “as needs basis.”

 

Item 4              Budget

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil advised members that Council is currently undertaking budget deliberations for the 2013/14 financial year, inclusive of a budget for redevelopment of the Roma CBD.  Once formally adopted by Council, this figure will be provided to members.  Council will also seek any available additional funding from sources such as, but not limited to the Federal & State government.

 

Item 5              Regulated Car Parking Update

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil advised members that a copy of the Roma car park audit undertaken by Council will be provided to members for review. Council is currently investigating leasing of a parcel of land in the CBD to increase the number of available car parks.

 

All present discussed Council’s proposal to introduce regulated parking, indicating that while difficult to achieve a balance was needed to best meet the needs of shoppers, including elderly, utilisation of shared zoning & business (staff parking).  Members also discussed the importance of exploring opportunities to encouraging shoppers to shop for longer, and the CBD being more extensively used as a meeting point.

 

Regulated Parking is to be included as an agenda item for next meeting for further discussion, with Roger White & Barry Winter from QPS invited to attend the next meeting to provide input into parking in the Roma CBD.

 

 

Item 6              General Business

 

Fire Hazards in the CBD

It was requested that the group be informed of Council’s ability to regulate and manage potential fire hazards identified in the Roma CBD. 

 

Council rating

It was requested that the group be informed on Council’s ability separately rate establishments on the main street that are not open to the public for trade.

 

Public Toilets – Arthur Street, Roma 

The group raised concerns with respect to the condition of the public toilets located on Arthur Street in Roma.  In response the Chair advised those present that Council had approved for the public toilets to be demolished, with further approval given for the construction of a new amenity block (with mural), in the vicinity.  He further explained that the current toilet block is located on a road reserve and cannot be extended to accommodate the provision of a mother’s room and disabled toilet. 

 

It was requested that the collective view of the group be provided to Council, being:-

 

·     The new toilets be constructed of similar material in order to maintain a comfortable temperature during extreme heat;

·     Council seek support from local businesses in maintaining the tidiness of the existing toilet block;

·     The new toilets be constructed to accommodate the provision of mothers room and disabled toilet.

 

 A vote was taken on the matter with a majority in favour of this approach and recorded as follows:-

 

Resolution Number RC.02.13

 

That Council place on hold the demolishing of the existing public toilets and consider for the existing block to remain operational, in addition to the new amenity block. 

 

CARRIED

 

Regulation of smoking locations/litter

It was requested that the group be informed of Council’s extent of authority in regulating designated smoking locations at Westlands Plaza and the subsequent litter of cigarette butts.

 

Taxi Ranks

It was requested that Council consider clearly marking taxi ranks with better located signage and marking of the bitumen.

 

There being no further business the Chair thanked all members for their attendance and closed the meeting at 7.29pm.

 

 

 

 

.............................................                                                                                                                                     ............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                                                          Date


Attachment 2

Unconfirmed Minutes - Roma CBD Advisory Committee - 02.07.13

 

 

Meeting:                     Roma CBD Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                           2 July 2013

Chair:                          Cr. Cameron O’Neil               

Attendees:                 Kevin Chambers, Robert Nugent, Sarah Holt, Jacki Erickson, Ian Galloway, Gabrielle Barron, Tyson Golder, Linette Chandler, Jim Scott, Gary Schefe, Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. Peter Flynn, Tony Klein, Kym Downey, Katrina Marsh, Kelly Rogers.

 

Apologies                   Katrina Marsh, Justin Garvie

Resolution Number RC.03.13

 

Moved Gabrielle Barron                                  Seconded Linette Chandler

 

That apology be received for Katrina Marsh & Justin Garvie for the meeting.

 

CARRIED

 

Minutes:                     Kelly Rogers

 

Meeting Opened:     6.01PM

Meeting Closed:       7.25PM           

 

Next Meeting Details

Date:                           30 July 2013

Time:                          6.00pm

Location:                    Council’s Administration Centre – Roma (Council Chamber)

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

2.0

Confirmation of Minutes

It was requested Council provide feedback to TMR feedback concerning the safety of bottle trees being sold outside of a residence (in a trailer) on the Warrego Highway, Roma.

 

Katrina Marsh to provide additional information concerning Council’s responsibilities with respect managing identified fire hazards in the Roma CBD.

Kelly Rogers

 

 

 

Katrina Marsh

30 July 2013

4.0

Roma CBD Development wish list

Kelly Rogers to circulate a template for capture of ideas for collation of a ‘Wish List’ from the committee.

Committee Members complete the circulated template and return to Kelly Rogers for compilation.

Chair to confirm formalised process for submission of committee requests/recommendations for presentation to full Council for further consideration.

Kelly Rogers

 

All

 

Cameron O’Neil

25 July 2013

 

25 July 2013

 

30 July 2013

5.0

Regulated Car Parking Update

Barry Winter of Queensland police Service be invited to attend the next committee meeting.

Cameron O’Neil

25 July 2013

Include as an Agenda item for next meeting – Regulated Car Parking

Kelly Rogers

25 July 2013

The Chair formally put forward for Council’s consideration the committee’s recommendation that “Council introduce regulated on street  parking for the whole of the area identified as the “CBD,” with a maximum allowable parking period of three (3) hours.

Cameron O’Neil

24 July 2013

6.0

General Business

The Chair formally put forward for Council’s consideration the committee’s recommendation that “That Council considers immediately introducing a 40km/hr speed limit in the Roma CBD.

Cameron O’Neil

24 July 2013

 

 

That Council Staff further investigate the road trains avoiding turning at the KFC corner and using non-designated roads within the CBD as an alternate route.

Kelly Rogers

10 July 2013

 


 

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2              Confirmation of Minutes

 

Resolution Number RC.04.13

 

Moved Jim Scott                                 Seconded Peter Flynn

 

That the Roma CBD Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes of 4 June 2013 be confirmed.

 

CARRIED

 

Item 3              Draft Terms of Reference

 

 Resolution Number RC.05.13

 

Moved Jim Scott                                 Seconded Ian Galloway

 

That the Roma CBD Advisory Committee Draft Terms of Reference be adopted as presented.

 

CARRIED

 

Item 4              Roma CBD Development wish list

 

The group requested an update on presentation of their formal request to Council - that the demolishing of the existing public toilets be placed on hold, and for the existing block to remain operational in addition to the new amenity block.

 

Chair, Cr. O’Neil, advised the group that the process of formalising of Advisory Committee Recommendations was under development.  As soon as this was finalised this recommendation would proceed formally and an update provided to the group.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Group Members offered ideas for inclusion on the ‘wish list’ as follows:-

 

·      Where possible utilise Bottle Trees to enhance Roma’s connection with the native tree

·      Consider additional parking for caravans, perhaps near the railway station

·      To assist with traffic congestion on Bowen Street, traffic to turn left in and out of this road only (Suggestion to be put forward to TMR)

·      Investigate practicality and legislation requirements around placing round about’s on McDowall Street (not all in favour of round abouts)

·      Utilise sandstone to finish of street corners (visually pleasing)

·      Encourage parking outside of the immediate CBD

·      Go ahead with mid street crossings

·      Improve safety and lower speed limit

·      Include community gathering points, both scattered and a larger combined area

·      Larger space could incorporate a precinct for kids, arts, water space, markets, play space, alfresco dining.

·      Retain number of car parks in CBD

·      Paint old style buildings on McDowall Street (visual appeal)

·      Include bubblers to drink from at key locations

·      Bottle Tree sculptures at either end of McDowall Street

·      Existing Toilets on Arthur Street to remain operational

·      Pedestrian crossing on Wyndham Street

·      Dress up the bottle tree’s & enhance existing theme (e.g. Easter in the Country)

·      Create ambience with lighting, including lighting of trees

·      Raised crossings (removable)

·      Introduce regulated parking

·     Fix drainage issues on McDowall Street as part of CBD upgrade  

 

Item 5              Regulated Car Parking Update

A key issue identified was the volume of long term parkers on the CBD streets.  (Business Employees)

Chair advise the group that in the instance of regulated parking being introduced, Council would enforce regulation through local laws.

 

Resolution Number RC.06.13

 

That Council consider the introduction of regulated on street parking for the whole of the area identified as “CBD,” with a maximum allowable parking period of three (3) hours.

 

CARRIED

 

Item 5              General Business

 

Speed Limit on McDowall Street, Roma

 

It was generally agreed by attending members that safety concerns be mitigated with the introduction of a reduced speed limit in the Roma CBD.

 

Resolution Number RC.07.13

 

That Council considers immediately introducing a 40km speed limit for motorists travelling in the Roma CBD.

 

CARRIED

 

 

Concerns about road trains

 

Members had observed road trains avoiding turning at the KFC corner for alternate routes in the Roma CBD, and requested this be further investigated.

 

Resolution Number RC.08.13

 

That Council officer’s further investigate road trains avoiding turning at the KFC corner and using non-designated roads within the CBD as an alternate route.

 

CARRIED

 

 

 

 

 

 

...............................................                                                                                                                         .............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                                               Date