General Meeting
Wednesday 10 April 2013
Roma Administration Centre
NOTICE OF MEETING
Date: 5 April 2013
Mayor: Councillor R S Loughnan
Deputy Mayor: Councillor W S Wason
Councillors: Councillor J L Chambers
Councillor R J Denton
Councillor P J Flynn
Councillor W M Newman
Councillor C J O’Neil
Councillor M L Price
Councillor D J Schefe
Chief Executive Officer: Ms Julie Reitano
Senior Management: Mr Tony Klein (Director Community & Commercial Services)
Mr Michael Parker (Acting Director Infrastructure Services)
Mr Rob Hayward (Director Development, Facilities & Environmental Services)
Officers: Ms Jane Frith (Coordinator Corporate Communications)
Please find attached agenda for the General Meeting to be held at the Roma Administration Centre on April 10, 2013 at 9.00am.
Julie Reitano
Chief Executive Officer
Maranoa Regional Council
General Meeting - 10 April 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Item Subject
No
2 Present/Apologies
3 Confirmation of Minutes
General 27 March 2013..................................................................................................... 4
4 Business arising from Minutes
5 On the Table
6 Presentations/Petitions and Deputations
7 Consideration of notices of business
8 Consideration of notices of motion
9 Reception of notices of motion for next meeting
Reports
10 Office of the CEO & Organisational Services
11 Community & Commercial Services
11.1 Queensland Music Festival - In Kind and Cash Contribution for 2013 Event 22
Prepared by: Jacqueline Burns, Coordinator - Libraries, Arts & Culture
11.2 Naming of Mitchell Multi Purpose Health Service (MPHS)
Extension............................................................................................................ 25
Prepared by: Tony Klein, Director - Community & Commercial Services
Attachment 1: Correspondence to QH regarding naming of MPHS.......... 27
Attachment 2: Correspondence from QH regarding naming of MPHS...... 28
12 Infrastructure Services
12.1 Capital Project - Upgrade of Pavement and Waterway Crossings on Eurella Settlers Road..................................................................................................................... 29
Prepared by: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Attachment : Rohan Dent - Eurella settlement Road Walhalla - Road Issue 33
12.2 Naming of Roads - Currey Street Development....................................... 34
Prepared by: Kim Edwards, Technical Officer - GIS/CAD
Attachment : Currey Street Development - Elevation - 9 SP180949 - Proposed Street Names........................................................................... 36
12.3 Transfer of Transport and Main Roads Funding...................................... 37
Prepared by: Cindy Irwin, Specialist - Infrastructure Program Funding
12.4 Capital Project - Kerb and Channel in Hasted Street.............................. 39
Prepared by: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Attachment 1: Complaint regarding no curb guttering along Hasted Street, Roma 42
Attachment 2: RE: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM - Kate Hannock - Hasted Street........................................................................... 43
Attachment 3: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM Natalie Haddock Hasted Street........................................................................... 47
12.5 Capital Project - Access to "Mountain Cottage" off Donnybrook
Road..................................................................................................................... 53
Prepared by: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Attachment 1: Helen and Huck Allen - Request to gravel a section of Donnybrook Road......................................................................................... 56
Attachment 2: Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage - Helen Allen 58
Attachment 3: Fwd: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd. Helen Allen.................................................. 60
13 Development, Facilities & Environmental Services
13.1 Material Change of Use - "Accommodation Units" (5 dwelling units) File: 2012/18195 62
Prepared by: Danielle Pearn, Coordinator - Planning
Attachment 1: Body of Report......................................................................... 70
Attachment 2: Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice................................ 91
Status Reports
14 Office of the CEO & Organisational Services
15 Community & Commercial Services
16 Corporate Services
17 Infrastructure Services
18 Commercial Business
19 Building, Facilities & Environmental Services
Next General Meeting
Confidential Items
In accordance with the provisions of section 275 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, a local government may resolve to close a meeting to the public to discuss confidential items that it’s Councillors or members consider it necessary to close the meeting.
C Confidential Items
C.1 Regional Arts Development Fund Applications from Round 3, 2012/13 Financial Year
Classification: Closed Access
Local Government Regulation 2012 Section 275(h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.
Councillor Business
20 Councillor Business
Closure
Minutes of the General Meeting of maranoa Regional Council held at Roma Administration Centre on 27 March 2013 commencing at 9.00am
ATTENDANCE
Mayor Cr. R S Loughnan chaired the meeting with, Deputy Mayor Cr W S Wason, Cr. J L Chambers, Cr. R J Denton, Cr P J Flynn, Cr. W M Newman, Cr. C J O’Neil, Cr. M L Price, Cr. D J Schefe, Chief Executive Officer – Julie Reitano, Coordinator – Corporate Communications – Jane Frith, and Kelly Rogers Minutes Officer in attendance.
AS REQUIRED
Director Community & Commercial Services – Tony Klein, (Acting) Director Infrastructure Services – Michael Parker, Manager Customer Service Facilitation – Samantha Thrupp, Coordinator Planning – Danielle Pearn, Specialist Development Engineer – Ruth Golden.
GUESTS
There were no guests in attendance at the meeting.
WELCOME
The Mayor welcomed all present and declared the meeting open at 9.06am.
APOLOGIES
There were no apologies for the meeting.
Confirmation of Minutes
Moved Cr Denton Seconded Cr Newman
That the minutes of the General Meeting (4-13.03.13) held on 13 March 2013 be confirmed.
CARRIED 9/0 |
Business Arising FROM MiNUTES
There was no business arising from the minutes.
On the Table
There were no items for discussion on the table.
Presentations/Petitions and Deputations
There were no presentations/petitions or deputations at the meeting.
Consideration of notices of business
There were no notices of business for consideration.
Consideration of notices of motion
There were no notices of motion for consideration.
Reception of notices of motion for next meeting
No notices of motion were received for the next meeting.
Business
Office of the CEO & Organisational Services
File Number: D13/11033 |
|
Subject Heading: Financial Sustainability Report for the period to 28 February 2013 |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Alan Marchant, Manager - Financial Operations |
|
Executive Summary: The Financial Sustainability Report for the period to 28 February 2013 together with a summary of Council’s actual performance at sub program level against Council’s approved budget (as amended in December Review) was presented for Council’s consideration.
|
|
Discussion: Cr. Price commended staff on production of a well written and concise financial report.
|
|
Moved Cr Price Seconded Cr Chambers That the progressive Financial Statements for the period to 28 February 2013, as included in the Financial Sustainability Report, be received subject to audit.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Financial Operations |
Community & Commercial Services
File Number: D13/9984 |
|
Subject Heading: Addition of HCI Bike Blender Smoothie to Maranoa Regional Council fees and Charges Register |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Melissa Wathen, Manager- Social Services |
|
Executive Summary: The Healthy Communities Initiative (HCI) promotes health and wellbeing within the Maranoa Region as per the funding agreement. The Bike Blender is a fun interactive way to demonstrate both good nutrition and physical activity. To purchase the produce required to promote this health initiative a cost needs to be applied to the individual sale of smoothies. As per Council’s policies, this fee needs to be reflected in the fees and charges register. |
|
|
|
Moved Cr Schefe Seconded Cr Denton That Council endorse the inclusion of a $2.00 fee per drink (including GST) for hire of the HCI Bike Blender Smoothie in Maranoa Regional Council’s Fees and Charges Register.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager- Social Services |
File Number: D13/10810 |
|
Subject Heading: Libraries Grant Programs Location: Regional |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Jacqueline Burns, Coordinator - Libraries, Arts & Culture |
|
Executive Summary: Maranoa Regional Council is eligible to submit projects for funding under the State Library of Queensland Vision 17 Grants Program (Creative Community Spaces) and the Opal Grants (Wi-Fi in Libraries). Applications close 29 March 2013.
The following projects are eligible and have been identified in consultation with Maranoa Library Staff and the State Library of Queensland. Creative Community Spaces - Roma Library: Upgrade of Courtyard space with an interactive and educational Children’s Space and Youth Cafe - Surat Library: Upgrade interactive/educational Children’s Space and Youth Cafe - Mitchell Library: Upgrade interactive/educational Children’s Space and Youth Cafe OPAL Grants – Wi-Fi in Libraries - Free Wi-Fi for libraries in Roma, Surat, Mitchell, Injune, Yuleba and Wallumbilla
|
|
Discussion: The Director Community & Commercial Services advised Council that officers would not be in a position to progress the application by the required due date for this round of funding under the program.
|
|
Moved Cr O'Neil Seconded Cr Newman That Council receive and note the officer’s report, accepting withdrawal of the report based on advice received from the Director Community & Commercial Services.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Coordinator - Libraries, Arts & Culture |
Infrastructure Services
File Number: D13/9603 |
|
Subject Heading: Amendments to Council's Interim Grids and Gates Policy |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Peter Weallans, Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
|
Executive Summary: Council at its General Meeting on 28 November 2012 adopted an Interim Grids and Gates Policy. Over the Christmas/New Year period, Council staff undertook a compliance audit of all gates and grids within the Region.
The purpose of this report was to recommend:- 1) Amendments to the interim grid policy in order to streamline the process of approvals for the licensing of grids and gates. 2) The initiation of a course of action for Council to address the findings of the compliance audit.
|
|
Discussion: Council determined that the matter should be further reviewed by full Council at an upcoming Workshop.
|
|
Moved Cr Price Seconded Cr O'Neil That the matter lay on the table for further consideration at a future General Meeting, following further discussion at a Council Workshop on 3 April 2013.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
File Number: D13/9609 |
|
Subject Heading: Capital Project: Property Access Road off Burtons Road |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design |
|
Executive Summary: Council received requests from two (2) property owners for maintenance and improvement works on a property access road off Burtons Road. |
|
|
|
Moved Cr Chambers Seconded Cr Denton
That:-
1. Council not approve the received requests, as Council currently provides both property owners direct access to Burtons Road. Should either of the property owners wish to carry out any further works on an alternative access, these would be undertaken at full cost to the applicant.
2. The Chief Executive Officer make contact with the the Department of Transport and Main Roads to clarify the designated School Bus Route for Burtons Road and connecting roads.
CARRIED 8/1 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design |
Development, Facilities & Environmental Services
Item Number: 13.1 |
File Number: D13/10495 |
Subject Heading: Negotiated Decision Request - Material Change of Use - Medium Impact Industry (Sewage Treatment Plant) and Environmentally Relevant Activity 63 - Sewage Treatment (File: 2012/18039) Location: 1750 Orallo Road, Euthulla QLD 4455 (Lot 46 on WV941) Applicant: Garland Trading Company Pty Ltd C/- Dwayne Garland |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Danielle Pearn, Coordinator - Planning |
Executive Summary:
Council approved an application for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use - Medium Impact Industry (Sewage Treatment Plant) and Environmentally Relevant Activity 63 - Sewage Treatment on land at 1750 Orallo Road, Euthulla QLD 4455 and described as Lot 46 on WV 941.
The approved development is experimental in its aim of using sewage water as an input to sustainable agriculture. The treated water will be used to drought-proof part of an agricultural property and expand its productivity. The acceptance and treatment of the sewage water also adds an income stream to a rural property. If successful, the experience gained will be applied to other locations.
Lot 46 is 20.9 hectares. Road frontage of Lot 46 is 445 metres. Lot 46 is part of a larger group of properties owned and occupied by members of the Garland family.
The proposed development is consistent with the provisions of the Bungil Shire Planning Scheme 2006 in that it proposes an industrial use in a rural area where that industrial use is related to rural production and is generally consistent with the performance criteria for industrial uses in the Rural Zone Code.
The site is identified as Good Quality Agricultural Land and is used for grazing and agriculture but the very small loss of the GQAL land in the Rural Zone to industry is outweighed by the improvements to the overall sustainability and viability of the property as a whole.
The applicant is seeking a negotiated decision notice which will reflect a number of changes to the approval. The potential changes are:
1. Reduction in the approved infrastructure contributions charges from $0.01 per litre to $0.005 per litre.
2. Proposed infrastructure agreement be designed to ensure the road infrastructure contributions are used on the upgrading of Orallo and Euthulla Roads.
3. Scope to increase the total volume of liquid carried from 50,000 litres to 100,000 litres per day.
4. Returns made to the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection be used as the basis for calculating the road infrastructure contributions rather than installing a road counter on the premises.
5. Use of B Doubles and road trains be allowed on Orallo and Euthulla Roads to transport waste water to the site.
Discussion:
Council determined that the matter should lay on the table for further discussion at a later point during the meeting pending further information from the investigating officer.
ACTION:
That the matter lay on the table for further discussion at a later point during the meeting, pending further information from the investigating officer.
File Number: D13/10519 |
||||||||||
Subject Heading: Application for Assessable Building Works Oversized Residential Outbuilding (File: 2013/18524) Location: 4 Allenby Court, Roma (Lot 12 SP141548) Applicant: Brett & Angela Pollock |
||||||||||
Author and Officer’s Title: Danielle Pearn, Coordinator - Planning |
||||||||||
Executive Summary: The application sought a Development Permit for Assessable Building Works involving a Residential Outbuilding exceeding 82m2 gross floor area (GFA) in the Residential Zone. The outbuilding is proposed to be located at 4 Allenby Court, Roma, described as Lot 12 on RP1771548. |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Moved Cr Denton Seconded Cr Wason That Council approve the application for a Development Permit for Assessable Building Works – Residential Outbuilding exceeding 82m2 GFA in the Residential Zone (180m/) at 4 Allenby Court, Roma, Described as Lot 12 on RP1771548, subject to the following conditions:
General
1. A Development Permit for Building Works must be obtained prior to commencing construction of the outbuilding.
2. The outbuilding is to be designed and sited in accordance with the approved plans:
3. The outbuilding must not be used as a habitable building or for commercial or industrial business purposes without the prior consent of Council.
4. The northern and southern elevations of the outbuilding are to remain open-sided in accordance with the approved plans and must not be enclosed with walls or doors of any kind at any time.
5. Landscaping is to be provided with a minimum width of 1.5 metres adjacent to the southern and western boundaries of the site for the length of the building elevation. Vegetation is to comprise species that will provide screening.
CARRIED 9/0 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
Responsible Officer |
Coordinator - Planning |
Councillor Business
File Number: D13/11357 |
|
Subject Heading: Use of vacant State Government land |
|
Author and Councillor’s Title: Cr. David Schefe |
|
That Council approach State Government requesting the potential use of the vacant lot beside the ambulance station as a Council car park to help alleviate the parking congestion in the Roma CBD.
|
|
|
|
Moved Cr Schefe Seconded Cr O'Neil That Council approach State Government requesting the potential use of the vacant lot beside the ambulance station as a Council car park to help alleviate the parking congestion in the Roma CBD.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
(Acting) Director Infrastructure Services |
Late Items
File Number: D13/10724 |
|
Subject Heading: Injune Water Supply Update Location: Injune |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Troy Pettiford, Manager - Water, Sewerage & Gas |
|
Executive Summary: Due to increased demand on Injune’s water supply, born from the energy sector, the town of Injune has experienced adverse effects on the potable water supply and pressure.
The report was an update on MRC plans, and recommendations for the mitigation of problems arising from lack of pressure and flow for the Injune community.
|
|
Discussion: Council enquired on timeframes for the availability of the Avdata Water Standpipe Facility being commissioned. The Acting Director Infrastructure Services advised that works will commence in May 2013 and are estimated to be completed by the end of June 2013.
|
|
Moved Cr Schefe Seconded Cr Chambers That steps be undertaken such that:-
1. Water carters currently using the standpipe in Injune reduce the extraction per day by 50% from April 1, 2013;
2. The Injune water standpipe cease operation from May 1, 2013, until the new Avdata Water Standpipe facility is commissioned.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Water, Sewerage & Gas |
Cr. O’Neil declared a potential ‘Perceived Conflict of Interest’ in the following item, due to his employment with the Queensland Murray Darling Committee, in that the organisation is currently investigating the development of a Waste Management Strategy for the Queensland Murray Darling Basin, for which Maranoa forms part. Cr. O’Neil elected to remain in the Chamber for discussion and debate on the item.
File Number: D13/11631 |
|
Subject Heading: Waste Management Strategy for Maranoa Region Location: Maranoa Region |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Margaret Milla, Coordinator - Waste |
|
Executive Summary: Council is required to develop a Waste Management Strategy for the Maranoa region under the Waste Reduction & Recycling Act 2011. |
|
|
|
Moved Cr Price Seconded Cr Chambers That Council:-
CARRIED (Cr. O’Neil voted in favour of the motion) 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Coordinator - Waste |
File Number: D13/11682 |
|
Subject Heading: Long Distance Passenger Transport Review Applicant: Department of Transport & Main Roads |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Kelly Rogers, Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement |
|
Executive Summary: A letter was received from the Minister for Transport & Main Roads (TMR) - Scott Emerson MP, seeking Council’s input into a comprehensive review being undertaken by TMR to improve the network of government-contracted long distance passenger transport services in regional Queensland. |
|
|
|
Moved Cr Wason Seconded Cr Schefe That the letter be noted and Council’s views be provided to the Chief Executive Officer at the next workshop of Council on 3 April 2013 for development of a submission in response to the Minister’s request.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement |
Subject Heading: suspension of standing orders
Council adjourned for morning tea at 10.07am.
Subject Heading: resumption of standing orders
Council resumed the meeting at 10.40am.
CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS
In accord with the provisions of section 275 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, Council resolved to close the meeting to discuss items it has deemed to be of a confidential nature and specifically pertaining to the following sections:-
(a) the appointment, dismissal or discipline of employees;
(h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage;
(e) contracts proposed to be made by it;
Moved Cr O'Neil Seconded Cr Wason
That Council close the meeting to the public at 10.42am.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
Cr. O’Neil left the Chamber at 11.03am.
Cr. O’Neil entered the Chamber at 11.05am.
Cr. O’Neil left the Chamber at 11.34am.
Cr. O’Neil entered the Chamber at 11.38am.
Cr. Flynn left the Chamber at 11.44am.
Cr. Flynn entered the Chamber at 11.46am.
Moved Cr Wason Seconded Cr Chambers
That Council open the meeting to the public at 12.31pm.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
Subject Heading: suspension of standing orders
Council adjourned for lunch at 12.31pm.
Subject Heading: resumption of standing orders
Council resumed the meeting at 1.22pm.
Cr. Newman entered the Chamber at 1.25pm.
File Number: D13/10495 |
|
Subject Heading: Negotiated Decision Request - MaterialChange of Use - Medium Impact Industry (Sewage Treatment Plant) and Environmentally Relevant Activity 63 - Sewage Treatment (File: 2012/18039) Location: 1750 Orallo Road, Euthulla QLD 4455 (Lot 46 on WV941) Applicant: Garland Trading Company Pty Ltd C/- Dwayne Garland |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Danielle Pearn, Coordinator - Planning |
|
Executive Summary: Council approved an application for a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use - Medium Impact Industry (Sewage Treatment Plant) and Environmentally Relevant Activity 63 - Sewage Treatment on land at 1750 Orallo Road, Euthulla QLD 4455 and described as Lot 46 on WV 941.
The approved development is experimental in its aim of using sewage water as an input to sustainable agriculture. The treated water will be used to drought-proof part of an agricultural property and expand its productivity. The acceptance and treatment of the sewage water also adds an income stream to a rural property. If successful, the experience gained will be applied to other locations.
Lot 46 is 20.9 hectares. Road frontage of Lot 46 is 445 metres. Lot 46 is part of a larger group of properties owned and occupied by members of the Garland family.
The proposed development is consistent with the provisions of the Bungil Shire Planning Scheme 2006 in that it proposes an industrial use in a rural area where that industrial use is related to rural production and is generally consistent with the performance criteria for industrial uses in the Rural Zone Code.
The site is identified as Good Quality Agricultural Land and used for grazing and agriculture but the very small loss of the GQAL land in the Rural Zone to industry is outweighed by the improvements to the overall sustainability and viability of the property as a whole.
The applicant is seeking a negotiated decision notice which will reflect a number of changes to the approval. The potential changes are:
1. Reduction in the approved infrastructure contributions charges from $0.01 per litre to $0.005 per litre. 2. Proposed infrastructure agreement be designed to ensure the road infrastructure contributions are used on the upgrading of Orallo and Euthulla Roads. 3. Scope to increase the total volume of liquid carried from 50,000 litres to 100,000 litres per day. 4. Returns made to the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection be used as the basis for calculating the road infrastructure contributions rather than installing a road counter on the premises. 5. Use of B Doubles and road trains be allowed on Orallo and Euthulla Roads to transport waste water to the site.
|
|
Discussion: Follow receipt of further information from the investigating officer, Council again resumed discussion and debate on the matter.
|
|
Moved Cr Flynn Seconded Cr O'Neil
1. Reduction in the approved infrastructure contributions charges from $0.01 per litre to $0.005 per litre. 2. Proposed infrastructure agreement is designed to ensure road infrastructure contributions are used on the upgrading of Orallo Road and Euthulla Road and other roads impacted by the development. 3. Ability to increase the total volume of liquid carried from 50,000 litres to 100,000 litres per day subject to meeting nominated criteria. 4. Returns made to the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection be used as the method for calculating the road infrastructure contributions instead of using a road counter on the premises. 5. Use of B Doubles and road trains on Orallo and Euthulla Roads subject to roads being upgraded to minimum standards and restrictions on operating times. Council approve the development subject to the following conditions: Complete and maintain the development 1. Complete and maintain the approved development as follows: (i) generally in accordance with development approval documents and (ii) strictly in accordance with those parts of the approved development which have been specified in detail by the Council unless the Council agrees in writing that those parts will be adequately complied with by amended specifications. Easements, building envelopes and covenants 2. The developer will be required to create an easement for access purposes over Lot 40 on WV837 in favour of Lot 46 on WV941 within two years of the commencement of the use. 3. Until the easement is created and before the use commences, the developer must provide documentation of an agreement that allows vehicles associated with the use to traverse Lot 40 on WV837 Stormwater and Drainage 4. The stormwater drainage system to service the development shall be in accordance with Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (Volume 1 text, Volume 2 Design Charts), Australian Rainfall and Runoff (Volume 1 A guide to Flood Estimation), and Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) Design Guidelines D-5 ‘Stormwater Drainage Design’. 5. Post-development stormwater runoff flows, whose characteristics include volume, concentration and velocities, from the development site are not to exceed pre-development stormwater runoff flows to adjoining properties. 6. Any increase in volume, concentration or velocity of stormwater from the property being developed shall be channelled to legal points of discharge or to other storage, dispersal or disposal arrangements which shall be agreed in writing by the Council. 7. Stormwater shall not be allowed to pond on the property being developed during the development process and after the development has been completed, unless the type and size of ponding has been agreed in writing by the Council or as a specific development approval condition. 8. The developer shall ensure that in all cases, discharge of stormwater runoff from the development drains freely to the legal points of discharge for the development and that no nuisance of ponding is created within the vicinity of the development. 9. There shall be no increases in any silt loads or contaminants in any overland flow from the property being developed during the development process and after development has been completed. Use of roads 10. The maximum quantity of waste water that can be transported to the site is 50,000 litres per day averaged out over a 7 day period for the 12 months. 11. At any time after the first 12 months of operations, the applicant can increase the volumes transported to a maximum of 100,000 litres per day subject to the following: a. The first 12 months road works program or any subsequent road works program required by an infrastructure agreement has been completed to the required standard. b. Independent review shows that the overall road condition has not deteriorated from the heavy transport vehicles associated with the approved activity, taking into account of the impacts from other road users. c. Provision of a bank guarantee of $110,000 for a further 12 months after the commencement of the increased use. The bank guarantee is to be provided before the increased use commences. d. The infrastructure agreement covering the use of road infrastructure contributions is worded so that the agreement is automatically extended to operate for five years from the date of commencement of the increased use. 12. Road trains are not permitted on Orallo Road for the transport of waste water to the site for treatment until 98% of the road meets the minimum specification of 6 metres of seal and 8 metres of carriageway. 13. Road trains and any type of B-doubles, carrying waste water to the site, are not permitted to travel on Orallo Road or Euthulla Road during the periods when school buses are scheduled to collect or drop-off school children Roadworks 14. The access from the property onto Orallo Road must be suitable for heavy vehicles to remain on the constructed roadway when entering and leaving the site with sight lines appropriate for the speed limit for that section of roadway in accordance with Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) D1 ‘Geometric Road Design’ Guidelines for Rural Design Criteria, and all roadworks shall be carried out in accordance with Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Queensland) (MUTCDQ) Part 3 requirements for roadworks on roads. 15. The pavement design for all roadworks shall be confirmed after in-situ subgrade testing has been carried out prior to construction of the pavement formation. The pavement design report along with the test results shall be provided to Council for approval prior to placement of pavement materials. 16. Roadside guide posts shall be installed to Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Queensland) (MUTCDQ) requirements and specifications with additional guide posts provided at vehicle cross-overs and underground drainage works. Access 17. The landowner shall be responsible for construction and maintenance of vehicle driveways from Orallo to the property boundary and for obtaining any approvals that may be required and for complying with the applicable designs and standards. 18. All vehicular access and related items must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area including Schedule 2: “Standards for Roads, Car Parking, Access and Manoeuvring Areas”, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist, (iv) the Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) Design Guidelines – D1 ’Geometric Road Design’ and (vi) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards. Services Provisions 19. The sewage treatment plant must have its own power supply even when connected to the local electricity supply. 20. All services installation, including sewer, water, electricity and telecommunications connections to the respective networks, must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist (iv) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (v) relevant Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) Design Guidelines that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards. Earthworks 21. The development is subjected to the Filling and Excavation Code detailed in the Bungil Shire Council Planning Scheme Part 5 with the modified requirement that retaining walls shall be used where batter grades exceed 25%. 22. All earthworks for the development shall be undertaken in accordance with Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) D6 ‘Site Regrading’ Design Guidelines for residential development. Earthworks within drainage pathways shall be accompanied by a Site Specific Stormwater Drainage Report detailing impacts of such earthworks on surrounding properties. Erosion Control 23. If there is a possibility of erosion or silt or other materials being washed off the property being developed during the development process, the developer must document and implement a management plan that prevents this from occurring. 24. Any construction works on site are to be undertaken in accordance with the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction Sites (IE Aust – or later versions). Latest versions 25. Where another condition refers to a specific published standard, manual or guideline, including specifications, drawings, provisions and criteria within those documents, that condition shall be deemed as referring to the latest versions of those publications that are publicly available at the time the first operational works or compliance approval is lodged with the assessment manager or approval agency for those types of works to be performed or approved, unless a regulation or law requires otherwise. RPEQ supervision 26. All civil and related work shall be designed and supervised by RPEQ Registered Professional Engineers of Queensland (RPEQ) who are competent in the construction of the works. Damage to roads and infrastructure 27. Any damage to roads and infrastructure, that is attributable to the progress of works on the development site or to vehicles associated with the development of the site, shall be repaired to at least the previous condition and at no cost to Council or, if the Council agrees, the cost of repairs may paid to Council for the Council to carry out the repairs. 28. It is the developer’s responsibility to document by photographs the previous condition of existing roads and infrastructure and to supply Council with a digital set of these photographs prior to any works commencing. Infrastructure contributions 29. The developer must pay $20,000 towards the cost of upgrading the local roads between the site and the nearest state-controlled road. 30. The developer must pay $0.005 per litre of waste water carried the local roads between the site and the nearest state-controlled road. This contribution is for the upgrading and maintenance of the roads and applies for 5 years from the commencement of the use. After 5 years, the Council may consider an increase in rates applicable to the use of the property and its impact on the road system. The contribution is to be paid quarterly. 31. To ensure that road contributions collected are used for the upgrading and maintenance of Orallo Road and Euthulla Road, an infrastructure agreement can be created which generally encompasses the following elements: a. Establishment by the Council of an annual works program for the upgrading of Orallo Road at the beginning of each year. b. The cost of this annual works program is to be based on the estimated annual contributions to be received during the year. c. Any road works undertaken using the infrastructure contributions must accord with the annual works program. d. Providing the applicant meets the construction standards set by the Council, including engineering supervision, the applicant can organise and implement the annual works program through private contractors. e. If the applicant undertakes the road works, an operational works application will be required. f. If the applicant elects not to undertake the annual road works program, the applicant must pay the Council the contributions for the annual works program every three months. g. If the applicant elects not to undertake the annual road works program, the Council may undertake the required annual road works or Council can contract out the works. Council will need advance notice to include the work in its annual program and can give no guarantee that the work will be completed within a particular timeframe. h. During the first year, the applicant is to complete road works equivalent to at least the estimated annual contribution. i. During each successive year, the applicant is to complete road works equivalent to the estimated annual contribution. j. The applicant will be given credit in a subsequent year where the works undertaken by the applicant in a particular year exceed the estimated or actual infrastructure contributions required for that year. k. A bank guarantee of $110,000 is to be provided by the applicant to the Council within six months of the commencement of the use to provide security for road contributions in the first year. This bank guarantee can be reduced as road works are undertaken. l. The timing for the annual road works program is offset from the annual contributions period by six months. 32. The developer is to maintain records of all heavy vehicles and their loads of regulated and unregulated waste water transported to the site and provide Council with a summary within 14 days of the end of every quarter. 33. The developer is to provide Council with a summary of all returns that are made to the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) for the transport of regulated and unregulated waste water to the site within 14 days of the end of every quarter. 34. The developer is to provide Council with access to the original records used to create the quarterly summaries. Completion of works before use 35. All development approval conditions related to the approved development must be fulfilled prior to uses commencing. No cost to Council 36. The developer is responsible for meeting all costs associated with the approved development unless there is specific agreement by other parties, including the Council, to meeting those costs. 37. Costs associated with the approved development to be met by the developer include all costs of survey, easement preparation, agreement preparation, covenant preparation, document lodgement, plan approval and land transfers.
Plan Approval 38. All rates and charges of any description and all arrears of such rates and charges, together with interest outstanding thereon, on the land, due to Council, shall be paid prior to the Council approving any Plan of Survey and prior to the use commencing. 39. All development approval conditions related to the establishment of the approved development must be fulfilled prior to any Plans of Survey being approved by the Council as assessment manager and prior to the use commencing. Operational works 40. To remove any doubt, this development requires operational works to be approved and completed.
CARRIED 8/1 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Coordinator - Planning |
File Number: D13/9670 |
|
Subject Heading: Proposed Organisational Structure - Customer Service Facilitation |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Samantha Thrupp, Manager - Customer Service Facilitation |
|
Executive Summary: The report outlined recommended changes to the structure of the Department of Customer Service Facilitation. These proposed changes were referenced in the report prepared by the Chief Executive Officer for the meeting of Council on 13 February 2013.
|
|
Moved Cr Chambers Seconded Cr Newman Prior to final consideration of the report, Council endorse proceeding to a two week formal consultation period in relation to the following:
1. The proposed Organisational Structure changes to the Department of Customer Service Facilitation;
2. The new role of Local Customer Liaison; with further consultation during the intervening period to be undertaken with respect to the remuneration value for the proposed introduction of additional duties;
3. The proposal for management of Council’s landline telephone system (TIPIT) to be transferred to the Department of Administration – Information Technology Unit;
4. Review and consultation at an
Executive Management Team level with respect to proposed changes to the
Cemetary management process
Further that the results from the consultation period be presented to Council for further consideration at the General Meeting on 10 April 2013.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
File Number: D13/9923 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Heading: Resource sector Supplementary Fees & charges budget – 2012/13 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Author and Officer’s Title: Peter Weallans, Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Summary: The purpose of this report was to recommend to Council a supplementary schedule of fees and charges in relation to commercial activities being undertaken on Council’s road network.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Moved Cr Schefe Seconded Cr Flynn That the following additional fees and charges be adopted within the framework of Council’s existing fees and charges schedule within the 2012/2013 budget:
CARRIED 9/0 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
File Number: D13/10266 |
|
Subject Heading: NDRRA Tender Recommendation 13/25 – North East Region Location: North East Region |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Francesco (Frank) Nastasi, Specialist – Senior Engineer |
|
Executive Summary: This contract is for the restoration of flood damaged roads and associated infrastructure in the North East Region of Maranoa Regional Council. Tender invitations were forwarded to all six contractors on Council’s elected panel with two (2) proposals received for consideration.
|
|
Moved Cr Wason Seconded Cr O'Neil That Council award the contract for restoration of flood damaged works in the North East Region, NDRRA Tender Number 13/25, for the sum of $9,388,529.75 + GST to FK Gardner & Sons Pty Ltd. CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Specialist – Senior Engineer |
File Number: D13/10543 |
|
Subject Heading: NDRRA Tender Recommendation 13/26 Location: South East Region |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Francesco (Frank) Nastasi, Specialist – Senior Engineer |
|
Executive Summary: This contract is for the restoration of flood damaged roads and associated infrastructure in the South East area of Maranoa Regional Council. Tender invitations were forwarded to all six contractors on Council’s elected panel with four (4) proposals received for consideration.
|
|
Moved Cr Denton Seconded Cr Price That Council award the contract for restoration of flood damaged roads in the South East Region, NDRRA Tender Number 13/26, for the sum of $7,440,659.51 + GST to F.K. Gardner and Sons Pty Ltd. CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Specialist – Senior Engineer |
File Number: D13/10148 |
|
Subject Heading: Tender APLNG-WP3-Civil Works to widen Yuleba Taroom Road Ch. 24000 - 38166 and also upgrade adjoining intersections at Horse Creek Road and Reedy Creek Road |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Peter Weallans, Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
|
Executive Summary: Council called for quotations from suitably experienced civil engineering contractors to carry out road widening works on the Yuleba – Taroom Rd. Ch. 24000m to 38166m. The proposed works also include upgrades of Yuleba – Taroom Rd. intersections with Horse Creek Rd. and Reedy Creek Rd. Responses closed on 8 January 2013 and have been assessed and ranked.
|
|
Moved Cr Chambers Seconded Cr Newman That Council award tender number APLNG-WP3 to PentaCon Pty Ltd at an estimated value of $5,003,581.00 (excluding GST) on the prior receipt from APLNG of a purchase order to cover the contract amount of $5,003,581 (excluding GST).
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
File Number: D13/10972 |
|
Subject Heading: Update on Energy Sector Activities associated with Road Network Upgrades |
|
Author and Officer’s Title: Peter Weallans, Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
|
Executive Summary: The purpose of this report was to keep Council informed of road related Energy Sector Activities within the Maranoa Region.
|
|
Moved Cr Price Seconded Cr Flynn That the content of the report be noted.
CARRIED 9/0 |
|
|
|
Responsible Officer |
Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services |
CLOSURE
There being no further business, the Mayor thanked Council for their attendance and declared the meeting closed at 2.16pm.
These Minutes are to be confirmed at the next General Meeting of Council to be held on 10 April 2013, at Roma Administration Centre.
...............………................. ..................................
Mayor. Date.
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 25 March 2013 |
Item Number: 11.1 |
File Number: D13/11626 |
Subject Heading: Queensland Music Festival - In Kind and Cash Contribution for 2013 Event
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant: Jacqueline Burns
Location: Roma
Author & Officer’s Title: Jacqueline Burns, Coordinator - Libraries, Arts & Culture
Executive Summary: The Queensland Music Festival is seeking an in kind contribution and an additional cash contribution for the 13th July 2013 event in addition to the financial payments allocated by Council in the 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 budgets.
|
That Council approves the requests of the Queensland Music Festival for an in kind contribution of $7,637 and considers the request for an additional $1,682 cash funding for the event.
|
Body of Report:
The Queensland Music Festival is confirmed for the 13th July 2013 at the Bassett Park Complex in Roma.
In accordance with the sponsorship agreement between the Maranoa Regional Council and the QMF, Schedule 1: Reference Schedule states at Item 4 that the Maranoa Regional Council’s obligations are for a cash contribution of $35,000 plus GST, to be paid in installments of $17,500 plus GST. Payment dates have been scheduled for the 4th March 2013 and the 8th July respectively.
As at Item 4 of Schedule 1: Reference Schedule, the in kind contribution is to be negotiated with the Maranoa Regional Council and the Queensland Music Festival.
The QMF have requested as an in kind contribution;
Sourced internally:
- Community Development Team staff to assist with coordinating the event
- Fee waiver on the lease of the venue
- Infrastructure staff to assist with set up and pack down
- Pre-event and post-event cleaning and waste removal at Bassett Park
- Six (3m x 3m) marquees
- Bobcat and operator
In kind support sourced externally includes:
- Security officers for 10 hours on the 11th and 12th July to guard the extensive staging and lighting equipment being transported to Bassett Park specifically for the event
- Electrician to assist with set up and pull down to ensure electrical safety at the event.
Consultation (internal/external):
Anthony Klein – Director of Commercial and Community Services
Lloyd Waldron – Manager Bassett Park
Julia Marr, Community Development Coordinator, Roma
Bernd Neumann, Technical Director – Queensland Music Festival
Seamus Mee, Producer – Queensland Music Festival
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Council endorsed the Queensland Music Festival in principle with the view that an in kind contribution was also required. Some of the requests are able to be sourced internally, however requests such as providing security and an electrician will need to be sourced externally.
Policy Implications:
Nil
Financial Resource Implications:
In Kind Request |
Sourced From |
Action |
Internal Cost Non-financial |
External Cost |
Provide Council Staff to assist with event coordination |
Community Development Team Salaries |
Coordinator – Libraries, Arts & Culture: approx 3 hrs per week 16 weeks prior plus 10 hrs for the event @ $36 per hr plus OT Coordinator- Community Development, Roma: approx 1 hr per week 8 wks prior plus 6 hrs for the event @ $36 per hour plus OT Coordinator - Corporate Communications: approx 2 hrs per week 12 wks prior @ $36 |
$1,728.00
$1040.00
$864.00 |
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 |
Provide Site Plan of Bassett Park |
Maranoa Regional Council |
Complete |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Venue Fee Waiver |
Bassett Park Complex |
Complete |
$720.00
|
$0.00 |
Provide pre & post cleaning and waste removal at Bassett Park |
Council staff: Lloyd Waldron – Manager Bassett park plus 2 staff |
Pre – event as per venue hire agreement
Post –event requires 3 staff @ $30ph for 8 hours |
$960.00 |
$0.00
$0.00 |
Provide static overnight security 11th and 12th July From 11pm – 9am |
Contractors: Roma Security |
Roma Security |
|
$1,250.00 |
Provide and install 6x (3m x3m) marquees |
Community Development Team |
Community Development staff |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Provide 2 helpers for 6hrs on Thurs 11th July in the morning and for 6 hrs on Sat 13th July for pack down of the show |
Operations |
2 x Infrastructure staff for 6 hours at standard rate ($21.25 ph) 2 x Infrastructure staff for 6 hours at OT rate |
$255.00
$510.00 |
$0.00
$0.00 |
Provide an electrician for set up and pack down 4 hrs total |
Contractor: Council preferred supplier |
Quote for 4 hrs @ $72 per hr |
$0.00 |
$432.00 |
Provide a Bobcat and operator for set up for 2 hrs total |
On site equipment at Bassett Park
|
Approximately 2 hrs @ $60 per hr |
$60.00 |
$0.00 |
VIP & Green Room |
Arts & Culture Budget |
Set up refreshments to VIP’s |
$1,500.00 |
$0.00 |
Sub Totals |
$7,637.00 |
$1,682.00 |
||
In kind request total = $7,637.00 Additional Cash request = $1,682.00 |
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 — 8.4.4(a) To develop community capacity and encourage community engagement with arts and culture so as to address the identified needs and opportunities to enhance the quality of life and wellbeing for residents of our region.
Supporting Documentation:
Sponsorship Agreement between MRC and QMF (Enclosure) |
S13/2998 |
Report authorised by:
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 3 April 2013 |
Item Number: 11.2 |
File Number: D13/12413 |
Subject Heading: Naming of Mitchell Multi Purpose Health Service (MPHS) Extension
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant: N/A
Location: Mitchell
Author & Officer’s Title: Tony Klein, Director - Community & Commercial Services
Executive Summary: Council has previously resolved to provide a range of options to Queensland Health regarding the naming of the Mitchell MPHS extension. Subsequent correspondence from Queensland Health has requested that Council provide its single preferred naming option for the facility. |
That Council advise Queensland Health that its preferred option for naming of the Mitchell MPHS extension facility is ‘Maranoa Place’ and that if not acceptable to the Minister for Health that the other names previously provided to the department should be considered in preferred order as determined by Council. |
Body of Report:
At its General Meeting of 13 March 2013, Council resolved that (GM/03.2013/01):
1. In addition to the suggestions put forward by the MRVASC for the naming of the Mitchell Multi Purpose Health Service Extension Building, Council submit the following suggestions in order of priority – 1) Maranoa Place 2) Maranoa Village & 3) Maranoa Wing;
2. The suggested names reflect Council’s historic association with the soon to be decommissioned Maranoa Retirement Village; and
3. Council submit the full listing of suggested names, inclusive of those put forward by the MRVASC for the Minister’s consideration.
Correspondence was forwarded to Queensland Health (QH) on the basis of the resolution and is an attachment to this report.
Subsequent correspondence (attached) has been received from QH in part stating, “…only one preferred name for the extension is to be submitted to the Minister. If there are any alternative names, these should be listed in order of preference…”
Consultation (internal/external):
Nil
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Political as determined by Council
Policy Implications:
Nil
Financial Resource Implications:
Nil
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 — 8.4.7(c) To provide an advocacy role for the provision of health services and facilities as required so as to address the needs of residents in the region.
Supporting Documentation:
1View |
Correspondence to QH regarding naming of MPHS |
D13/10048 |
2View |
Correspondence from QH regarding naming of MPHS |
D13/12406 |
Report authorised by:
Correspondence to QH regarding naming of MPHS |
Enquiries: Tony Klein
Phone: 0427 235155
14 March 2013
Ms Meryl Brumpton
Chief Operations Officer
South West Health Hospital and Health Service
PO Box 1006
ROMA QLD 4455
Dear Meryl
Mitchell MPHS Extension Naming Options
With the imminent completion of the Mitchell MPHS Extension project, Council considers it timely to offer some alternative naming options for the building.
From our previous discussions, the Minister for Health has sole discretion on the naming of any buildings on Queensland Health property.
In light of that and Council’s historic association with the soon to be decommissioned Maranoa Retirement Village, at its most recent general meeting, Council resolved to offer these prioritised suggestions to the Minister:
1. Maranoa Place
2. Maranoa Village
3. Maranoa Wing
In addition and through community consultation, the Maranoa Retirement Village Auxiliary Sub Committee (MRVASC) have offered the following suggestions:
1. Booringa Wing
2. Booringa Village
3. Booringa Place
As you would be aware, the previous local government area incorporating the Mitchell community was the Booringa Shire Council and the suggestions offered by the MRVASC reflect this previous association.
It would be greatly appreciated if you could pass these naming options on to the Minister for his consideration.
If you need more information regarding this matter please contact Tony Klein, Director Community & Commercial Services on 0427 235155 or 1300 007 662.
Yours sincerely
Julie Reitano
Chief Executive Officer
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 7 March 2013 |
Item Number: 12.1 |
File Number: D13/9323 |
Subject Heading: Capital Project - Upgrade of Pavement and Waterway Crossings on Eurella Settlers Road
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant:
Location:
Author & Officer’s Title: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Executive Summary: Council has received a request for the installation of culverts on Eurella Settlers Road as sections of the road are impassable following rain events. |
Council consider this project as part of future budget deliberations
|
Body of Report:
The applicant has advised Council that there are sections of Eurella Settlers Road that are impassable following rain events. He has requested that the road be upgraded to a standard that can be trafficked in a two wheel drive vehicle in all weather.
Inspection of this road revealed the following:
Good quality gravel pavement has been placed on sections of the road as part of flood restoration works;
Low grade pavement material has been used on some sections of the road surface resulting in “soft” spots;
Drainage of some sections of the formation / pavement is inadequate and does not direct the flow from the surrounding cultivation down the road side;
There are 4 waterways that experience a flow during rain events which deposits silt material on existing gravel pavement;
Council has several options to improve this road to a standard trafficable by a two wheel drive vehicle. Basic drainage improvements could be carried out under a road maintenance regime. Gravel pavement placement or replacement may be prioritized according to existing condition. The waterway crossings could be improved through (a) cement stabilization of pavement, (b) construction of concrete floodways or (c) installation of culverts. Any upgrade works could be staged.
Road Details: |
||||||||||
Length: |
8.03 |
kilometres |
|
|
|
|||||
Properties accessed: |
3 |
|
|
|||||||
Traffic: |
10-99 vpd |
|
|
|||||||
Class: |
Rural Access |
|
|
|||||||
Standards |
||||||||||
Adopted: |
Rural Access |
|
||||||||
Gravel pavement |
4 |
m wide |
|
|
||||||
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
|
|
||||||
Flood immunity |
2 |
year ARI |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||||
Current: |
Rural Access |
|
||||||||
Gravel pavement |
4 |
m wide |
- |
8.030 |
k |
|||||
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
- |
8.030 |
k |
|||||
Flood immunity |
1 |
year ARI |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
Proposed: |
Rural Access |
|
||||||||
Gravel pavement |
4 |
m wide |
- |
8.030 |
k |
|||||
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
- |
8.030 |
k |
|||||
Flood immunity |
2 |
year ARI |
|
|
|
|||||
(Improved quality of pavement) |
||||||||||
Associated Costs |
||||||||||
Construction |
||||||||||
1.000 |
kilometres |
4 |
m wide |
Gravel pavement |
||||||
$40,000.00 |
/ k = |
$40,000.00 |
||||||||
TOTAL |
$40,000.00 |
|||||||||
NOTE: This cost is for 1 kilometre Total length required approx 3.0 kilometres – Total Cost $120,000.00 |
||||||||||
(a) |
40.000 |
Metres |
4 |
m wide |
Cement Stabilised Floodway |
|||||
$40.00 |
/ m2 = |
$6,400.00 |
||||||||
(b) |
20.000 |
Metres |
4 |
m wide |
Concrete Floodway |
|||||
$250.00 |
/ m2 = |
$20,000.00 |
||||||||
(c) |
20.000 |
Metres |
6 |
m wide |
Culverts & approaches |
|||||
$350.00 |
/ m2 = |
$42,000.00 |
||||||||
NOTE: The above costs are for one waterway Total floodways required is 4 – Total Cost (Culverts) = $168,000.00 |
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
Whole of Life |
|
|||||||||
Current: |
|
|||||||||
Light maintenance grade |
1 per 18 months |
$3,351.19 |
pa |
|
||||||
Capital renewal |
$3,635.98 |
pa |
|
|||||||
Total |
$6,987.17 |
pa |
|
|||||||
Proposed: |
|
|||||||||
Light maintenance grade |
1 per 18 months |
$3,351.19 |
pa |
|
||||||
Capital renewal |
$6,302.65 |
pa |
|
|||||||
Total |
$9,653.84 |
pa |
|
|||||||
Variation: |
|
|||||||||
An annual increase of |
$2,666.67 |
pa |
|
|||||||
Based on highest annual Capital renewal cost |
|
|||||||||
Consultation (internal/external):
Julie Reitano – Chief Executive Officer
Peter Weallans – Manager Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services
Ciaran Lawler – Engineer
Richard Hamilton – (Acting) Coordinator – Roads & Drainage South (Mitchell)
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Nil
Policy Implications:
Local Government Act 2009 requires that all disbursements have been provided for in the local government’s budget for the financial year.
As this project has not been included in the current budget or works program, funds will need to be allocated prior to the project commencing.
Financial Resource Implications:
Total Capital cost of $288,000; increase in annual renewal cost of $2,666.67 (based on highest annual capital renewal cost).
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 —
8.5.1(a) To provide professional and technical engineering advice and support
for Council in an effective and timely
manner.
Supporting Documentation:
Nil
Report authorised by:
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 21 March 2013 |
Item Number: 12.2 |
File Number: D13/11139 |
Subject Heading: Naming of Roads - Currey Street Development
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant: Hillscorp
Location: Currey Street Development Roma
Author & Officer’s Title: Kim Edwards, Technical Officer - GIS/CAD
Executive Summary: Names are sought for four unnamed roads located in the development at 43-49 Currey Street Roma, also described as Lot 9 on SP180949.
|
That Council name the roads which are outlined in the attached map “Dobel Way”, “Wheeler Drive”, “Dawson Court” & “Olsen Court”.
|
Body of Report:
Council has received a request from Hillscorp for street naming approval for the four new roads to be created as part for the development at 43-49 Currey Street Roma. The roads are required to be named before addressing can be provided and to support emergency service access.
Street names have been provided by Hillscorp in accordance with Council’s Road Naming Policy. The proposed names based on past Archibald Prize winners are –
“Dobel Way”
“Wheeler Drive”
“Dawson Court”
“Olsen Court”
Consultation (internal/external):
Kim Edwards – Technical Officer GIS/CAD
Toby Zaremba - Hillscorp
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Nil
Policy Implications:
Complies with Road Naming Policy
Financial Resource Implications:
Nil
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 —
8.5.1(a) To provide professional and technical engineering advice and support
for Council in an effective and timely
manner.
Supporting Documentation:
1View |
Currey Street Development - Elevation - 9 SP180949 - Proposed Street Names |
D13/11137 |
Report authorised by:
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 27 March 2013 |
Item Number: 12.3 |
File Number: D13/11898 |
Subject Heading: Transfer of Transport and Main Roads Funding
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant:
Location:
Author & Officer’s Title: Cindy Irwin , Specialist - Infrastructure Program Funding
Executive Summary: A subsidy of $400,000 was approved by Transport and Main Roads (TMR) to extend Primaries Road through to the sale yards. As per a previous Council resolution, this construction is not going ahead. Options to transfer the subsidy to another project was discussed with TMR who advised that due to funding constraints, an alternative project will need to demonstrate high priority and be of regional significance. The upgrade of the intersection of the Carnarvon Highway and Airport Drive was identified as meeting the above criteria and will provide benefits to Council and TMR.
|
Council advise TMR that the works planned for Primaries Road, Roma will not go ahead until the outcomes of the planning study for heavy vehicles and Type 2 Road Trains are known and request that the subsidy of $400,000 to be transferred to the upgrade of the intersection of the Carnarvon Highway and Airport Drive.
|
Body of Report:
A subsidy of $400,000 was approved under the Transport Infrastructure Development Scheme (TIDS) provided by TMR for the extension of Primaries Road to provide an additional access to the sale yards. This subsidy was provided on the basis Council matched the subsidy and that the funds need to be expended by 30 June 2013.
With the current funding constraints, TMR have advised that if Council wishes to transfer this funding, consideration will only be given to high priority projects with a regional significance and works will need to be completed by 30 June 2013. A review of Council’s current capital works program has not identified any projects that would meet the criteria.
These funds were awarded to Council on a matched funding basis. Council will not be required to match the allocation if it is transferred to a TMR project.
At a recent meeting with TMR, it was suggested that an option to transfer the subsidy of $400,000 to the upgrade of the intersection of the Carnarvon Highway and Airport Drive may be considered as current funding for this project is extremely tight. Transfer of this allocation to this project will ensure the funds remain in the Roma region. This project is considered a high priority as it will provide improved safety for road users on the local and state road network and improve access to the airport as a major transportation hub for the region.
Consultation (internal/external):
Michael Parker, Director Infrastructure Services (Acting)
Kym Downey, Manager Infrastructure Planning and Design
Transport and Main Roads, Deputy Regional Director Kym Murphy
Transport and Main Roads, Bruce Steele
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Nil
Policy Implications:
Nil
Financial Resource Implications:
Matching funding of $400,000 will not be required to be provided by Council as works are on the State Network.
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 — 8.5.3(a) To undertake any road works maintenance requirements in a planned, responsive and efficient manner for the benefit of all road users.
Supporting Documentation:
Nil
Report authorised by:
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 3 April 2013 |
Item Number: 12.4 |
File Number: D13/12457 |
Subject Heading: Capital Project - Kerb and Channel in Hasted Street
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant:
Location:
Author & Officer’s Title: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Executive Summary: Council has received a request from a resident of Hasted Street, Roma to have kerb and channel installed in that street
|
That Council consider this project in future budget deliberations
|
Body of Report:
Natalie Haddock has approached Council requesting the installation of kerb and channel in Hasted Street. Hasted Street does not have kerbing on either side but is subject to some stormwater flow. The installation of kerb and channel will assist in retaining some stormwater flow within the cross-section of the roadway.
Location |
Hasted Street, Roma |
||||||||
Standards |
|||||||||
Construct kerb and channel - Hasted Street |
|||||||||
Construction (each side) |
|||||||||
220.00 |
lm of |
kerb and channel |
|||||||
$85.00 |
/ lm = |
$18,700.00 |
|||||||
440.00 |
m2 |
widen pavement and seal |
|||||||
$45.00 |
/ m2 = |
$19,800.00 |
|||||||
$38,500.00 |
|||||||||
Whole of Life (each side) |
|||||||||
Current: |
|||||||||
Capital renewal |
0 |
pa |
|||||||
Total |
$0.00 |
pa |
|||||||
Proposed: |
|||||||||
Capital renewal |
$1,790.22 |
pa |
|||||||
Total |
$1,790.22 |
pa |
|||||||
Variation: |
|||||||||
An annual increase of |
$1,790.22 |
pa |
|||||||
Consultation (internal/external):
Julian McEwan – Manager Roads & Drainage North and Regional Parks & Gardens
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Nil
Policy Implications:
Local Government Act 2009 requires that all disbursements have been provided for in the local government’s budget for the financial year.
As this project has not been included in the current budget or works program, funds will need to be allocated prior to the project commencing.
Financial Resource Implications:
Capital cost of $45,200; increase in annual renewal cost of $452.00
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 —
8.5.1(a) To provide professional and technical engineering advice and support
for Council in an effective and timely
manner.
Supporting Documentation:
1View |
Complaint regarding no curb guttering along Hasted Street, Roma |
D12/2104 |
2View |
RE: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM - Kate Hannock - Hasted Street |
D12/24350 |
3View |
FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM Natalie Haddock Hasted Street |
D13/12450 |
Report authorised by:
Complaint regarding no curb guttering along Hasted Street, Roma |
From:Natalie Haddock[SMTP:n.haddock@hotmail.com]
To:Maranoa Regional Council[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=council]
Received-Date:20120124
Received-Time:3:18:59 PM
Sent-Date:20120124
Sent-Time:3:19:18 PM
Subject:CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to express my concerns about not having curbed guttering in our street (Hasted st)
I and the rest of the residents in the street find it overly frustrating that we yet still not have curbed guttering. (with long term rate payers including us) There are approx 12 houses in this street.
When a street where the new development on the corner of bowen & Currey st has curbed guttering, a pot holes free road get this benefit but not even an existent street on the town map, but ours has nothing at all but pot holes forming and is like a one road street.
Also especially when it rains a large amount of water sits on the side of the road for days even when you get full sun & hot days. This forms a LARGE amount of mosquito's as the water has nowhere to flow/drain to. (see attached photos)
Another issue when it has a serious downfall of rain the water runs straight underneath our house and through our shed (approx1-2inches high) this also add to having extremely more amounts of mosquito's.
We all also believe that because of this it makes the street look untidy.
'
Your concern & action to this matter would be greatly appreciated to us and on behalf of the remainder of the residents in Hasted st
View photo.JPG in slide show View photo.JPG in slide show
RE: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM - Kate Hannock - Hasted Street |
From:Peter Weallans[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PETER.WEALLANS]
To:'n.haddock@hotmail.com'[SMTP:n.haddock@hotmail.com]
Cc:'joydenton@cravecom.com.au'[SMTP:joydenton@cravecom.com.au]
Cc:Barry Omundson[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Barry.omundson]
Cc:Paul Cummins[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=Paul.cummins]
Cc:John (Blue) Gwydir[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=John.gwydir]
Received-Date:20120815
Received-Time:2:52:00 PM
Sent-Date:20120815
Sent-Time:2:52:06 PM
Subject:RE: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
TRIM-Embedded:Name="image001.jpg",Extension="jpg",Size="737",EncodedOffset="00001814",EncodedSize="00000001008"
Dear Natalie,
I am writing to you on behalf of Council with regards to your concerns relating to inadequate drainage in Hasted Street.
I would like to apologise on behalf of Council for you not having received a reply earlier.
I have looked into your case and have come to the following conclusions:
With regards to the kerb and channelling on Courtney Street, this kerb and channelling was paid for by the developer who bought the land along the southern side of Courtney Street. The reason it was replaced was because it started to fail as a result of the expansive nature of the underlying black soil.
I recognise that there is a need for better drainage on Hasted Street. Council will be undertaking a detailed survey of Hasted Street and the surrounding area to help identify specific drainage issues and traits with the view to rectifying the problem.
If you have any questions please contact Paul Cummins on 4624 0723 in the first instance.
Thank you
Peter
Hi Natalie,
I must apologise for the delay in acknowledgeing your correspondence, I have not been home for the past week , away on Council buisness, I will pass on your request to relevant officers , If you do not recieve a reply please feel free to follow up with me ,
thankyou for taking the time to bring this to our attention , Budgetery maters may delay the delivery of many needs in our communities ,but rest assured we are trying,
Regards Joy
----- Original Message -----
From: Natalie Haddock <mailto:Natalie.Haddock@epic.com.au>
To: joydenton@cravecom.com.au
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 12:04 PM
Subject: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hi Joy,
I was told that you where the best person to talk to about a concern,
As per below you can see that I sent an email to the Maranoa Council in January just before the floods then followed up on this personally
in the office a few weeks after the flood occurred in February but I have not received a reply or nothing.
I did have attached photos but I suppose photos won't do it justice neither.
We have heard that Courtney street behind us has one side of the street done with curbed guttering but not the other & that the council is ripping that up & re-doing the curbed guttering on the existing side.
My partner & I have just put concrete surrounding our house to try & minimise the water flowing under our house & to stop the breed of mosquitoes but
there is nothing else that we can do in our street for the water to flow away.
As I said before in the below email, it simply makes the street look untidy ESPECIALLY when it rains & the water cannot flow away.
Thank you & hope to hear from you soon!
Many Thanks
Natalie Haddock
Operations Support Officer
Epic Energy
25 Bardlomey Road
Wallumbilla 4428
Phone: (07) 4629 8000 Fax: (07) 4629 8050
Mobile: 0457 880 780
www.epicenergy.com.au
________________________________
From: n.haddock@hotmail.com
To: council@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Subject: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:18 +1100
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to express my concerns about not having curbed guttering in our street (Hasted st)
I and the rest of the residents in the street find it overly frustrating that we yet still not have curbed guttering. (with long term rate payers including us) There are approx 12 houses in this street.
When a street where the new development on the corner of bowen & Currey st has curbed guttering, a pot holes free road get this benefit but not even an existent street on the town map, but ours has nothing at all but pot holes forming and is like a one road street.
Also especially when it rains a large amount of water sits on the side of the road for days even when you get full sun & hot days. This forms a LARGE amount of mosquito's as the water has nowhere to flow/drain to. (see attached photos)
Another issue when it has a serious downfall of rain the water runs straight underneath our house and through our shed (approx1-2inches high) this also add to having extremely more amounts of mosquito's.
We all also believe that because of this it makes the street look untidy.
'
Your concern & action to this matter would be greatly appreciated to us and on behalf of the remainder of the residents in Hasted st
-------------------------------Safe Stamp-----------------------------------
Your Anti-virus Service scanned this email. It is safe from known viruses.
For more information regarding this service, please contact your service provider.
This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any attachments for viruses. Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments.
====Embedded==== image001.jpg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=
FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM Natalie Haddock Hasted Street |
From:Peter Weallans[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=PETER.WEALLANS]
To:Joy Denton[SMTP:joy.denton@maranoa.qld.gov.au]
Cc:Kym Downey[SMTP:Kym.Downey@maranoa.qld.gov.au]
Cc:Michael Parker[SMTP:Michael.Parker@maranoa.qld.gov.au]
Received-Date:20130327
Received-Time:5:30:07 AM
Sent-Date:20130327
Sent-Time:5:30:05 AM
Subject:FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
TRIM-Embedded:Name="maranoalogo",Extension="",Size="9552",EncodedOffset="00002710",EncodedSize="00000013070"
TRIM-Embedded:Name="image001.jpg",Extension="jpg",Size="737",EncodedOffset="00005a3f",EncodedSize="00000001008"
Hi Joy
Kym Downey, as result of the restructure, is responsible for formulating Council’s future Capital Works Budgets .
The request for kerb and channel will have to be considered by Council.
Kym will contact Natalie and explain the process to her.
Thanks
Peter
Peter Weallans
Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services
INFRASTRUCTURE OFFICE
D: (07) 4624 0713 M: (04) 2995 0352 F: (07) 4624 6990
Skype: mrc.peter.weallans
From: Natalie Haddock [mailto:Natalie.Haddock@epic.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March 2013 10:31 AM
To: joydenton@cravecom.com.au
Cc: Peter Weallans
Subject: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hi Joy & Peter,
Just wondering if my request for curbed guttering in Hasted st Roma has been ignored??
Reason why I ask is because I have not heard any correspondence from the Council in regards to curbed guttering. My request was made January 2012 (last year) & then further followed up in July.
I have also noticed that Twine st is getting guttering & I can only presume so is the eastern side of Wyndham st……?
Any plans for Hasted Street in the VERY near future???
Natalie Haddock
From: Joy Denton [mailto:joydenton@cravecom.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 9 August 2012 1:54 PM
To: Natalie Haddock
Subject: Fw: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hello Peter,
This was the complaint to which I referred . I am aware that Cameron recieved a complaint regarding the same area, I would like to point out that this complaint was made in January , once more we have failed to acknowledge correspondence,
Kind Regards ,
Joy
----- Original Message -----
From: HYPERLINK "mailto:peter.weallans@maranoa.qld.gov.au"Peter Weallans
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:'joydenton@cravecom.com.au'"'joydenton@cravecom.com.au'
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 10:20 AM
Subject: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hello Joy,
Please see correspondence below.
This is currently being investigate. However, these are the only complaints that we can find.
Is there another complaint you are referring to for Hasted St/Courtney St?
Thank you
Peter
Peter Weallans
Manager Construction & Maintenance
cid:C056615ABBAB45E4BCF79D758C8DAB5C@joycbcc7dde9b0
Maranoa Regional Council
INFRASTRUCTURE OFFICE
1 Cartwright Street Roma QLD 4455
Postal Address: P.O Box 42 MITCHELL QLD 4465
P: 1300 007 662
D: (07) 4624 0713 M: (04) 2995 0352 F: (07) 4624 6990
Skype: mrc.peter.weallans
Email: HYPERLINK "mailto:peter.weallans@maranoa.qld.gov.au"peter.weallans@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Web: HYPERLINK "http://www.maranoa.qld.gov.au"www.maranoa.qld.gov.au
_____
The information contained in the above e-mail message or messages (which includes any attachments) is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the use of the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the addressee any form of disclosure, copying, modification, distribution or any action taken or omitted in reliance on the information is unauthorised. Opinions contained in the message(s) do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Maranoa Regional Council and its Agents. If you received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your computer system network.
ü Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
From: Barry Omundson
Sent: Sunday, 29 July 2012 5:52 PM
To: Peter Weallans
Cc: Melissa Fleming
Subject: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Peter
Can I have the story behind this one this week please.
Thanks Barry
Barry Omundson
Director Infrastructure
INFRASTRUCTURE OFFICE
Ext: 6702 D: (07) 4624 0702 M: (04) 0927 9124 F: (07) 4624 6990
Skype: mrc.barry.omundson
From: Joy Denton [mailto:joydenton@cravecom.com.au]
Sent: Sunday, 29 July 2012 5:49 PM
To: Cameron O'Neil @ Home; Barry Omundson
Subject: Fw: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hi Natalie,
I must apologise for the delay in acknowledgeing your correspondence, I have not been home for the past week , away on Council buisness, I will pass on your request to relevant officers , If you do not recieve a reply please feel free to follow up with me ,
thankyou for taking the time to bring this to our attention , Budgetery maters may delay the delivery of many needs in our communities ,but rest assured we are trying,
Regards Joy
----- Original Message -----
From: HYPERLINK "mailto:Natalie.Haddock@epic.com.au"Natalie Haddock
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:joydenton@cravecom.com.au"joydenton@cravecom.com.au
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 12:04 PM
Subject: FW: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Hi Joy,
I was told that you where the best person to talk to about a concern,
As per below you can see that I sent an email to the Maranoa Council in January just before the floods then followed up on this personally
in the office a few weeks after the flood occurred in February but I have not received a reply or nothing.
I did have attached photos but I suppose photos won’t do it justice neither.
We have heard that Courtney street behind us has one side of the street done with curbed guttering but not the other & that the council is ripping that up & re-doing the curbed guttering on the existing side.
My partner & I have just put concrete surrounding our house to try & minimise the water flowing under our house & to stop the breed of mosquitoes but
there is nothing else that we can do in our street for the water to flow away.
As I said before in the below email, it simply makes the street look untidy ESPECIALLY when it rains & the water cannot flow away.
Thank you & hope to hear from you soon!
Many Thanks
Natalie Haddock
Operations Support Officer
Epic Energy
25 Bardlomey Road
Wallumbilla 4428
Phone: (07) 4629 8000 Fax: (07) 4629 8050
Mobile: 0457 880 780
HYPERLINK "http://www.epicenergy.com.au"www.epicenergy.com.au
_____
From: HYPERLINK "mailto:n.haddock@hotmail.com"n.haddock@hotmail.com
To: HYPERLINK "mailto:council@maranoa.qld.gov.au"council@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Subject: CUSTOMER REQUEST/COMPLAINT FORM
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 16:19:18 +1100
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to express my concerns about not having curbed guttering in our street (Hasted st)
I and the rest of the residents in the street find it overly frustrating that we yet still not have curbed guttering. (with long term rate payers including us) There are approx 12 houses in this street.
When a street where the new development on the corner of bowen & Currey st has curbed guttering, a pot holes free road get this benefit but not even an existent street on the town map, but ours has nothing at all but pot holes forming and is like a one road street.
Also especially when it rains a large amount of water sits on the side of the road for days even when you get full sun & hot days. This forms a LARGE amount of mosquito's as the water has nowhere to flow/drain to. (see attached photos)
Another issue when it has a serious downfall of rain the water runs straight underneath our house and through our shed (approx1-2inches high) this also add to having extremely more amounts of mosquito's.
We all also believe that because of this it makes the street look untidy.
'
Your concern & action to this matter would be greatly appreciated to us and on behalf of the remainder of the residents in Hasted st
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 4 April 2013 |
Item Number: 12.5 |
File Number: D13/12522 |
Subject Heading: Capital Project - Access to "Mountain Cottage" off Donnybrook Road
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant:
Location:
Author & Officer’s Title: Kym Downey, Manager - Infrastructure Planning & Design
Executive Summary: Council has been approached to upgrade the current access to “Mountain Cottage” off Donnybrook Road
|
That Council consider this project in future budget considerations
|
Body of Report:
Helen Allen has contacted Council with a request to gravel the access road to her property “Mountain Cottage”. This property currently does not have direct access to a public road. The existing formation is black soil. Mrs Allen has requested that this work be undertaken as a matter of urgency, pending the closing of a quarry on Mt Bindango Road.
Road Details: |
||||||
Length: |
1 |
kilometre |
||||
Properties accessed: |
1 |
|||||
Traffic: |
<10 VPD |
|||||
Class: |
Rural Minor Access |
|||||
Standards |
||||||
Adopted: |
Rural Minor Access |
|
||||
Sealed Surface |
- |
m wide |
||||
Gravel pavement |
- |
m wide |
||||
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
||||
Flood immunity |
1 |
year ARI |
||||
Current: |
Rural Minor Access |
|
||||
Sealed Surface |
- |
m wide |
- |
0.000 |
k |
|
Gravel Pavement |
- |
m wide |
- |
0.000 |
k |
|
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
- |
1.000 |
k |
|
Flood immunity |
1 |
year ARI |
||||
Proposed: |
Rural Access |
|
||||
Sealed Surface |
- |
m wide |
- |
0.000 |
k |
|
Gravel Pavement |
4 |
m wide |
- |
1.000 |
k |
|
Formation |
8 |
m wide |
- |
1.000 |
k |
|
Flood immunity |
1 |
year ARI |
||||
Associated Costs |
||||||
Construction |
||||||
1.000 |
kilometres of |
4 |
m wide |
Gravel Pavement |
||
$40,000.00 |
/ k = |
$40,000.00 |
||||
$40,000.00 |
||||||
Whole of Life |
||||||
Current: |
||||||
Light maintenance grade |
1 per 18 months |
$0.00 |
pa |
|||
Capital renewal |
$0.00 |
pa |
||||
Total |
$0.00 |
pa |
||||
Proposed: |
||||||
Light maintenance grade |
1 per 18 months |
$417.33 |
pa |
|||
Capital renewal |
$452.80 |
pa |
||||
Total |
$870.13 |
pa |
||||
Variation: |
||||||
An annual increase of |
$870.13 |
pa |
Consultation (internal/external):
Noel Kerr: Technical Officer – Engineering Services
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
Nil
Policy Implications:
Local Government Act 2009 requires that all disbursements have been provided for in the local government’s budget for the financial year.
As this project has not been included in the current budget or works program, funds will need to be allocated prior to the project commencing.
Financial Resource Implications:
Total Capital cost of $40,000; increase in annual renewal cost of $870.13
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 —
8.5.1(a) To provide professional and technical engineering advice and support
for Council in an effective and timely
manner.
Supporting Documentation:
1View |
Helen and Huck Allen - REquest to gravel a section of Donnybrook Road |
S12/872 |
2View |
Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage - Helen Allen |
D13/11223 |
3View |
Fwd: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd. Helen Allen |
D13/11224 |
Report authorised by:
Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage - Helen Allen |
From:Huck & Helen Allen[SMTP:hbhfallen@bigpond.com]
To:Melissa (Mel) Fleming[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MelissaF]
Received-Date:20130321
Received-Time:12:29:29 AM
Sent-Date:20130321
Sent-Time:12:28:54 AM
Subject:Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
TRIM-Embedded:Name="Request to gravel access road.docx",Extension="docx",Size="75364",EncodedOffset="00000afc",EncodedSize="00000103132"
TRIM-Embedded:Name="Map Gravel Road Request.docx",Extension="docx",Size="235046",EncodedOffset="00019e09",EncodedSize="00000321642"
Hi Melissa,
Here is the request as discussed. As I mentioned before we've got 17 years of our girls needing access to the school bus and our access road is Mitchell grass black soil which makes it impossible with the slightest be of rain. We've been trying to get assistance with this for the past nine years and have another 40 years here of paying rates which will be over $300K. Jim Blackburn is talking of shutting that quarry down possibly after the council leaves and we see this as our only chance. If not for anything else we need our road gravelled for medical emergencies.
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
Begin forwarded message:
From: Huck & Helen Allen <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Subject: Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
Date: 7 March 2013 2:57:20 PM AEST
To: noel.kerr@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Hi Noel,
The last time we spoke about getting assistance from the council to gravel our access road you mentioned that it would have to be budgeted for so I resent through the request letter. I was wanting to know if it ever went before the council?
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
Ph: 4623 3426
Begin forwarded message:
From: Huck & Helen Allen <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Subject: Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
Date: 30 April 2012 7:38:37 AM AEST
To: noel.kerr@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Hi Noel,
I realise the council has been busy with the floods and elections and all but I was just wondering if you got a chance to have a look at the email I sent you in March? I sent this through to Mitchell as well and followed up with a phone call but still haven't heard anything. We've now got a new baby and we'd really like to have our property more accessible in case of emergencies.
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
"Mountain Cottage"
Roma Qld 4455
Begin forwarded message:
From: Huck & Helen Allen <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Subject: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
Date: 15 March 2012 1:57:32 PM AEST
To: noel.kerr@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Fwd: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd. Helen Allen |
From:Huck & Helen Allen[SMTP:hbhfallen@bigpond.com]
To:Melissa (Mel) Fleming[EX:/O=ROMA REGIONAL COUNCIL/OU=EXCHANGE ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT)/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=MelissaF]
Received-Date:20130321
Received-Time:12:29:29 AM
Sent-Date:20130321
Sent-Time:12:30:13 AM
Subject:Fwd: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd.
Hi Melissa,
Here is more of the previous paper trail.
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Parker <Michael.Parker@maranoa.qld.gov.au>
Subject: RE: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd.
Date: 16 July 2012 2:13:11 PM AEST
To: 'Huck & Helen Allen' <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Cc: Barry Omundson <barry.omundson@maranoa.qld.gov.au>, Kelly Rogers <Kelly.Rogers@maranoa.qld.gov.au>
Good afternoon Helen,
Thanks for your email, and I apologise for the lack of response to your previous email.
I will have your request investigated , and a response forwarded.
Regards, Michael Parker
From: Huck & Helen Allen [mailto:hbhfallen@bigpond.com]
Sent: Monday, 16 July 2012 2:06 PM
To: Michael Parker
Subject: Request to gravel access road - "Mountain Cottage", Donnybrook Rd.
Hi Michael,
My name is Helen Allen and I am following up a request to gravel an access road and a couple of weeks ago I was told it would have to be budgeted for and therefore I needed to send the request to the CEO. This is a new gravel request, not gravelling due to flooding. The original request I sent through to Mitchell (we are on the boundary between Booringa and Bungil Shires) was in January 2012 and since then I have been chasing this up, getting redirected to various people and not getting anywhere. It would be much appreciated if you could have a look at this request and forward it onto the appropriate person if need.
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
Begin forwarded message:
From: Huck & Helen Allen <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Subject: Fwd: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
Date: 30 April 2012 7:38:37 AM AEST
To: noel.kerr@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Hi Noel,
I realise the council has been busy with the floods and elections and all but I was just wondering if you got a chance to have a look at the email I sent you in March? I sent this through to Mitchell as well and followed up with a phone call but still haven't heard anything. We've now got a new baby and we'd really like to have our property more accessible in case of emergencies.
Kind regards,
Helen Allen
"Mountain Cottage"
Roma Qld 4455
Begin forwarded message:
From: Huck & Helen Allen <hbhfallen@bigpond.com>
Subject: Request to gravel access road - Mountain Cottage
Date: 15 March 2012 1:57:32 PM AEST
To: noel.kerr@maranoa.qld.gov.au
Officer Report
Meeting: General 10 April 2013 |
Date: 14 March 2013 |
Item Number: 13.1 |
File Number: D13/10261 |
Subject Heading: Material Change of Use - "Accommodation Units" (5 dwelling units) File: 2012/18195
Classification: Open Access
Name of Applicant: Flair Constructions Pty Ltd C/- Damien Digney
Location: 2 Crawford Street, Roma QLD 4455 (Lot 1 on SP178384)
Author & Officer’s Title: Danielle Pearn, Coordinator - Planning
Executive Summary: The application seeks a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use – Accommodation Units (5 dwelling units) on land at 2 Crawford Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 1 on SP178384.
The proposed development is consistent with the intent of the Residential Zone, however as submitted, the proposal does not comply with the Urban Area Code. The proposal seeks relaxations of the minimum boundary setbacks which are considered to compromise the residential amenity of the Urban Area.
This report concludes that the conflict with the planning scheme may be resolved by reducing the number of units from five to four, to achieve adequate boundary setbacks and ensure the residential character and amenity of the Urban Area is maintained.
|
Body of Report: Refer to Attachment 1.
Consultation (internal/external):
- Ken Ryan and Associates Pty Ltd and Lou Scarpato Futureproof Strategies as part of the LOCAL GOVERNMENT PLANNING ALLIANCE (Development Assessment).
- Public Notification was carried out in accordance with the requirements of SPA.
- Engineering comment sought internally.
Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):
The applicant has appeal rights under SPA against any decision of Council
Policy Implications:
The application generally accords with the Policy position of the Roma Town Planning Scheme.
Financial Resource Implications:
Any conditions imposed will be at the cost of the developer.
Link to Corporate Plan:
Corporate Plan 2009-2013 — 8.3.1(a) Regulate and control development in a consistent and responsible manner that enhances the lifestyle of our community whilst promoting sustainable development.
Supporting Documentation:
1View |
Body of Report |
D13/10436 |
2View |
Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice |
D13/10625 |
Report authorised by:
Robert Hayward, Director- Development, Facilities & Environmental Services
Body of Report |
1.0 Background information
The proposed development is for Accommodation Units including five dwelling units on the site.
The proposal comprises three buildings including one individual unit and two buildings each containing two units. Each unit will consist of three bedrooms, two bathrooms and a lounge, dining and kitchen area. The buildings will be single storey with a maximum height of 4.7 metres and a Gross Floor Area (GFA) of approximately 625 square metres.
The development in its proposed form does not comply with the minimum boundary setbacks for Accommodation Units and is considered to compromise the residential amenity of the Urban Area. The proposal seeks a 3.5 metre relaxation of the building setback to the Crawford Street frontage of the site and 1.5 metre relaxation to north-eastern side boundary. This conflict with the Urban Area Code may be resolved by reducing the number of units from five to four to allow the buildings to be adequately separated from property boundaries.
It is proposed that each unit be provided with two car parking spaces inside a double carport. Two visitor parking spaces are also proposed. With the removal of one of the units a total of 10 parking spaces will be provided on site.
Motor vehicle access to the site will be obtained via a new crossover from Crawford Street and egress via a new crossover to Miscamble Street. Adequate manoeuvring is provided for ingress and egress from the carports and from the site.
Landscaping is proposed along both the Miscamble Street and Crawford Street frontages of the site and southern boundary, to enhance the visual amenity of the development from the street and adjoining sites, and to screen the development.
The applicant has provided the following Proposal Plans in support of the proposed development –
The proposed use is defined as "Accommodation Units" in the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006 which is described as follows:
“Accommodation Units” means any premises comprising an integrated development of dwelling units and/or rooming units. The term includes multiple dwelling units, retirement villages and apartment houses.
The site is situated at 2 Crawford Street, Roma QLD 4455 and described as Lot 1 on SP178384 (refer Figure 1 - Locality Plan).
Figure 1 - Locality Plan Source: Whereis (2013)
The site is situated in the Residential Zone of the Town Area in the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006 (refer Figure 2 - Zoning).
Figure 2 - Zoning Source: Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006
The site is currently vacant. The site is adjoined to the north-west and north east by single storey residential dwellings. To the south-east of the site is six accommodation units contained in a single building. The site is bound by Crawford Street to the south-west and has a narrow frontage to Miscamble Street to the south-east (refer Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph).
Figure 3 - Aerial Photograph Source: Google 2013
3.0 Assessment against the planning scheme
Impact assessment
This application is subject to Impact Assessment and is assessed against the relevant provisions of the planning scheme, including any relevant codes. The provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 [SPA] may be summarized: s313 provides that the assessment manager must carry out the impact assessment having regard to—
(a) the State planning regulatory provisions;
(b) the regional plan for a designated region, to the extent it is not identified in the planning scheme as being appropriately reflected in the planning scheme;
(c) any applicable codes, other than concurrence agency codes the assessment manager does not apply, that are identified as a code for IDAS under this or another Act;
(d) State planning policies, to the extent the policies are not
a) any relevant regional plan as being appropriately reflected in the regional plan; or
b) the planning scheme as being appropriately reflected in the planning scheme;
(e) any applicable codes in the following instruments—
(i) a structure plan;
(ii) a master plan;
(iii) a temporary local planning instrument;
(iv) a preliminary approval to which section 242 applies;
(v) a planning scheme;
(f) if the assessment manager is an infrastructure provider—the priority infrastructure plan.
There is no conflict with these provisions of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.
Proposed use is in conflict with planning scheme
The development proposal is not in conflict with the intent of the zone within which it is proposed, however it does present conflict with the Urban Area Code with respect to residential character and amenity. The proposal, as submitted, requires substantial boundary relaxations which will adversely impact on local character and residential amenity. By reducing the number of units from five to four, compliance with the minimum boundary setback requirements can be achieved, which will ensure the residential amenity of the locality is not compromised by the development.
Desired Environmental Outcome
The Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEOs) are based on ecological sustainability established by IPA and are the basis for the measures of the planning scheme. Compliance is outlined below:
(a) Environment
(i) The areas of high scenic amenity, remnant vegetation, wetlands, fauna habitats and wildlife corridors and regionally significant open space in the town are protected.
The subject site is located in a residential area and contains minimal vegetation and no features of environmental significance. The proposed development will not impact on any other environmentally significant areas, including wetlands, habitats, corridors and open spaces.
(ii) Places, areas or sites identified as being susceptible to land degradation, including contamination, erosion, salinity and landslip, are protected and further degradation is minimised.
The subject site is not identified as being susceptible to land degradation. Nevertheless the proposed development does not involve any works which may result in such issues.
(iii) Ecological sustainability is achieved by maintaining and improving biodiversity, water and air quality.
The proposed development will not adversely impact on water or air quality nor adversely impact on the biodiversity of the area.
(iv) Places of historical and indigenous cultural heritage and social significance are protected, maintained and enhanced.
The subject site is not identified as being in proximity to, or a place of, historical, cultural or social significance.
(b) Economic
(i) Business and commercial development shall be located within the Commercial Zone to promote and strengthen the existing central Business District.
(ii) The Central Business District (CBD) or inner core of the Commercial Zone is intended to contain the more intensive commercial uses. Entertainment facilities and tourist accommodation will also be favoured within and adjacent to the CBD to provide a central focus of activity and promote vitality after office hours.
The proposal is for residential development in a residential area and will not compromise the location of business and commercial development with the Commercial Zone and CBD.
(iii) Beautification and improved parking facilities will enhance the efficiency, attractions and vitality of the Town CBD.
The proposed development is for residential development within close proximity to the Town CBD.
(iv) Tourism will be promoted with significant economic and social benefits to the town as a regional centre with close association with the oil and gas industry and the proximity of the Carnarvon National Park.
The proposed development is for residential development in an established residential area and will not adversely impact on the promotion of tourism.
(v) Industry, business and employment opportunities are improved and appropriately located to service the community and region, and encourage economic activity within the local area.
The proposed development is for residential development within an established residential area and will not adversely impact on industry, business and employment opportunities.
(c) Community Well-Being & Lifestyle
(i) Convenient access to roads and services is achieved through well located land uses and the efficient use and timely provision of infrastructure such as water, sewerage and roads walkways and cycling facilities.
The proposed development is located within an established residential area, and will be connected to reticulated water, sewer and electrical infrastructure.
(ii) Infrastructure networks such as road and rail, water cycle and electricity infrastructure are protected from encroachment by sensitive land uses which may adversely affect or limit the normal operation of that infrastructure.
The proposed development will gain access from Crawford Street and egress to Miscamble Street, via a new crossover to each street. The proposed development will not encroach on any established infrastructure networks.
(iii) Rural residential and urban residential development occurs in distinct localities that provide a sense of community, amenity, services, and a safe, affordable living environment, whilst maintaining the rural amenity of the Town Area.
The proposed Accommodation Units will be located within an established residential area. Appropriate setbacks and landscaping to the boundaries of the site will ensure the rural amenity of the area is maintained.
(iv) The adverse effects from natural and other hazards, including bushfires are minimised.
The site is not subject to natural or other hazards.
(v) The range of housing types, services and facilities meets the needs of the community and other uses.
The development is for Accommodation Units for four dwelling units, and will increase the range of housing types available to the community.
(vi) Community well being is not compromised by inappropriate development that impacts upon noise levels, traffic volume, lighting levels, local amenity.
The proposal is for a residential use within a residential area. The proposed development will minimise adverse impacts to surrounding residential uses through acoustic fencing and landscaping at the side and rear boundaries, sufficient manoeuvring on the site for vehicles and control of lighting emissions.
Overall Outcomes for Urban Area Code
The Urban Area Code identifies overall outcomes providing direction about relevant assessment issues. The overall outcomes for the Urban Area Code are the purpose of the code. The overall outcomes sought for the Urban Area are the following:
(a) Roma is a focus for a range of business, industrial, tourist, community and recreational activity in the local government area.
The proposed development is for a use that will support the expansion of business, industrial, tourist, community and recreation activity in the local government area.
(b) Business and commercial development is located primarily in the CBD to provide central and accessible services to the local government area.
The proposal is for Accommodation Units and will be located in an established residential area. The proposal will not compromise the location of business and commercial development within the Commercial Zone.
(c) The residential and heritage character and amenity of the Urban Area is retained.
The proposed buildings are limited to one storey and 4.7 metres in height and will be screened from Crawford Street and adjoining residences by acoustic fencing and landscaping along the boundaries. The development proposal seeks a reduction of the minimum boundary setbacks to the Crawford Street frontage and north-eastern side boundary which are considered to compromise the residential character and amenity of the Urban Area. A reduction in the number of units from five to four will ensure the scale of the development and building siting, in conjunction with the proposed screening, will retain the residential character and amenity of both the streetscape and the wider Urban Area.
(d) Safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists is maintained and enhanced.
The proposed development will maintain a high level of amenity and permeability along pedestrian pathways at the Crawford Street and Miscamble Street frontages of the site through landscaping and appropriately located and safe vehicle access.
(e) Residential (including Rural Residential) development occurs where there is no adverse impact on Good Quality Agricultural Land.
The site is located in an established residential area and is not mapped as containing Good Quality Agricultural Land (GQAL). The proposed Accommodation Units will therefore not result in fragmentation or reduction of GQAL.
(f) Residential development is buffered from the existing and proposed road and rail corridors to minimise any detrimental impact.
The proposed development is located within an established residential area, which is well protected from road traffic noise levels. Landscaping and acoustic fencing along site boundaries will assist in mitigating any internal road traffic noise impacts on adjoining properties.
(g) Residential development accommodates a range of housing types and allotment sizes, and provides a safe and pleasant living environment, with adequate access to community services and is located in the residential preferred areas shown on the Urban Area Maps in the appendices.
The development proposal as amended to achieve adequate boundary setbacks, will comprise four dwelling units. The proposed development will increase the range of housing types available to residents in Roma and is located in close proximity to community services and facilities in the town centre. The proposed development will maintain a safe and pleasant living environment both in the immediate surrounds and the wider area, by providing sufficient on-site car parking, acoustic fencing and landscaping.
(h) The expansion of residential development occurs in areas where it is most cost effective to supply physical infrastructure, such as water, sewerage, roads and electricity.
The site is currently well serviced by physical infrastructure, such as water, sewerage, roads and electricity.
(i) Efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure, such as schools, neighbourhood shopping, community services, public transport services, and parks are provided in residential areas.
The proposal is located in a well established residential area with efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure.
(j) Industrial development is located in the Industrial Zone of the town (see maps in appendices).
The proposal is not for industrial development.
(k) Impacts of industrial uses are required to be within acceptable limits and uses are undertaken in a sustainable manner consistent with the amenity and character of the area concerned.
The proposal is not for industrial development.
(l) Small scale business, community and emergency services are provided for the needs of the local community.
The proposed development is for Accommodation Units in the Residential Zone, and will not adversely impact on provision of small scale business, community or emergency services.
(m) All Areas other than the Commercial Zone are protected from shopping centre and other forms of commercial development.
The proposal is for Accommodation Units in the Residential Zone.
The Code’s relevant Performance Criteria are shown below, in order to more easily permit structured and detailed consideration of relevant issues—
Urban Area Code
Performance Criteria |
Assessment responses |
(i) A. For all the Town Zone |
|
1. Infrastructure |
|
PC 1 Electricity Premises are provided with a supply of electricity adequate for the activity. |
The proposed development is located in established urban area with access to electricity infrastructure. |
PC 2 Water Supply Premises are provided with an adequate volume and supply of water for the activity. |
The proposed development is in a well established urban area with reticulated water supply available. Each unit will be provided with a 3,000L capacity rainwater tank for roof water runoff and reuse for non-potable uses. |
PC 3 Effluent Disposal To ensure that public health and environmental values are preserved, all premises provide for the treatment and disposal of effluent and other waste water. |
The proposed development is in a well established urban area with reticulated sewerage available. |
PC 4 Stormwater/Inter-Allotment Drainage Stormwater is collected and discharged so as to: (a) protect the stability of buildings or the use adjacent land; (b) prevent the waterlogging of nearby land; and (c) protect and maintain environmental values. |
The proposed development will provide an appropriate stormwater drainage system in accordance with the standards in Schedule 6: “Standards for Stormwater Drainage”. |
PC 5 Vehicle Access Vehicle access is provided to a standard appropriate for the use. |
The proposed development will gain access via a new crossover from Crawford Street. Egress will be to Miscamble Street via a new crossover. Access will be designed and constructed in accordance with Schedule 2: “Standards for Roads, Car parking, Access and Manoeuvring Areas”. |
PC 6 Density The density of residential activities does not impact adversely on the residential amenity of the town. |
N/A – The proposed development is not for a Dwelling House.
|
PC 7 Parking and Manoeuvring Vehicle parking and service vehicle provision is adequate for the use whilst ensuring both safe and functional operation for motorists and pedestrians. |
The proposed development includes a total of 10 car parking spaces. This exceeds the requirements in Schedule 2: Standards for roads, car parking, access and manoeuvring areas in the Roma Town Planning Scheme for Accommodation Units. |
PC 8 Roads All weather road access is provided between the premises and the existing road network. |
The proposed driveway will be developed to a standard that provides for all weather road access between the premises and the existing road network. |
PC 9 State Controlled Roads State Controlled Roads are maintained and enhanced as a link between major centres. |
The proposed development will not gain access from a State Controlled Road. |
PC 10 Development Adjacent to State Controlled Roads Development adjacent to State Controlled Roads is located to ensure safe and efficient use of the highway and maintain the integrity of the highway as a commuter link. |
The proposed development is not located adjacent to a State controlled road. |
PC 11 Noise Sensitive Development Noise sensitive developments (residential, education and community) must ensure that road traffic noise levels are appropriately managed to achieve acceptable levels of amenity. |
The proposed development is located within an established residential area, which is well protected from road traffic noise levels and has a high level of residential amenity. Landscaping and acoustic fencing along site boundaries will assist in mitigating any internal road traffic noise impacts on adjoining properties. |
PC 12 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome Development (a) does not adversely affect the operation of the aerodrome; (b) is designed and located to achieve a suitable standard of amenity for the proposed activity; and (c) does not restrict the future operational demands of the aerodrome. |
N/A - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome. |
PC 13 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome The development of premises does not cause an obstruction or other potential hazard to aircraft movement associated with the aerodrome by way of: (a) the physical intrusion of buildings or other structures into the Obstacle Limitation Surface; (b) attracting birds or bats to the area which could cause or contribute to bird strike hazard; (c) providing very bright lighting or lighting similar to aerodrome lighting which can distract or confuse pilots; (d) interfering with navigation or communication facilities; (e) emissions that may affect pilot visibility or aircraft operations; or (f) transient intrusions into the aerodromes operation space. |
N/A - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome. |
PC 14 Gas and Oil Pipelines Buildings are located at an appropriate distance from pipelines to ensure community safety and operation of the use is not compromised. |
The subject site is within an established residential area and is located at an appropriate distance from pipelines. |
PC 15 Refuse Tips and Effluent Treatment Plants Premises are located at an appropriate distance from refuse tips and effluent treatment plants to ensure community safety and operation of the uses are not compromised. |
The subject site is not within proximity to refuse tips and effluent treatment plants. |
PC 16 Rail Corridors Development is at an appropriate distance from the rail corridor so as not to prejudice safety, speed or intended role of the existing and proposed rail corridors.
|
The proposed development is not within 100 metres of existing or proposed rail corridors. |
PC 17 Noise Attenuation Development adjoining the rail corridor is protected from the impact of noise. |
N/A – The proposed development does not adjoin a rail corridor. |
2. Environment |
|
PC 18 Watercourses Development ensures the maintenance of riparian areas and water quality including protection from off-site transfer of sediment. |
N/A – The site is not located in proximity to any watercourses. |
PC 19 Protected Areas Development is undertaken to ensure areas of significant biodiversity and habitat value are protected. |
N/A – The proposed development is not in close proximity to any areas of significant biodiversity and habitat value. |
PC 20 Flooding Premises are designed and located so as: (a) not to adversely impacted upon by flooding; (b) to protect life and property; and (c) not to have an undesirable impact of the extent and magnitude of flooding. |
The site is not mapped as being affected by a 1 in 100 year flooding event.
|
PC 21 Air Emissions Air emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses.
|
The proposal is for residential development and will not cause environmental harm or nuisance from air emissions. |
PC 22 Noise Emissions Noise emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses. |
The proposed development is for Accommodation Units and is expected to generate negligible noise emissions. A 1.8 metre high screen fence and landscaping on the side and rear boundaries will further reduce potential noise impacts on adjoining dwellings. This will be imposed as a condition of approval. |
PC 23 Water Quality The standard of effluent and/or stormwater runoff from premises ensures the quality of surface water is suitable for: (a) the biological integrity of aquatic ecosystems; (b) recreational use; (c) supply as drinking water after minimal treatment; (d) agricultural use; or Industrial use; and (e) Minimises nuisance or harm to adjoining land owners. |
A 3,000L rainwater tank will be provided for each unit, for roof water runoff and reuse for non-potable uses. Site stormwater is able to be discharged to Miscamble Street. |
PC 24 Excavation and Filling Excavation and filling of land ensures: (a) that both the amenity and safety of users of the site and adjacent land holdings; and (b) soil erosion is kept to a minimum with remedial works. |
N/A – The proposal does not involve excavation or filling. |
PC 25 Construction Activities Both erosion control and silt collection measures are undertaken so as to ensure protection of environmental values during construction. |
erosion control and silt collection measures will be implemented during construction to ensure protection of environmental values. |
PC 26 Bushfire Hazard Area Development maintains the safety of people and property by avoiding areas of high or Medium Bushfire hazard or mitigating the risk through: (a) the siting of buildings ensuring setbacks from hazardous vegetation are maximised and elements lease susceptible to fire are sited closest to the bushfire hazard; and (b) the provision of firebreaks to ensure adequate setbacks between Buildings, structures and Hazardous vegetation. |
The proposed development is not mapped as containing a Medium or High Bushfire Hazard Area. |
PC 27 Character Buildings Development adjacent to buildings identified as heritage or character buildings within Schedule 9 incorporates design features, materials and details that blend with the existing character of the adjoining buildings and/or place. |
N/A – The site is not in proximity to buildings identified as heritage or character buildings. |
PC 20 Cultural Heritage The significance of known places of indigenous and/or cultural heritage value is retained. |
The site is not in proximity to known places of indigenous and/or cultural heritage value. |
B. For the Residential Zone |
|
a) Residential Development – Dwelling House, Dual occupancy and Accommodation Units |
|
PC 29 Height The height of residential buildings is compatible with and complementary to the character of the urban environment. |
The proposed development will have a maximum height of one storey and 4.7 metres. |
PC 30 Site Coverage and Setbacks (a) Residential building design and siting maintains the character of the locality in terms of building bulk. (b) Residential buildings are located to ensure the local amenity and streetscape are protected and enhanced. |
The development proposes a setback of 3.5 metres to the Crawford Street frontage of the site, 30 metres from the Miscamble Street frontage, 4.3 metres from the north-western side boundary, 6.5 metres from the south-eastern side boundary and 1.5 metres from the north-eastern side boundary.
The proposal does not achieve the minimum setback requirements of 7 metres to the Crawford Street frontage of the site and 3 metres from the north-eastern side boundary. Conditions of approval will require the removal of the single detached unit to allow adequate separation between the remaining four units and these boundaries. The amended proposal will protect the amenity of the streetscape and ensure the residential character and amenity of the urban area is retained.
Due to the shape of the property, the north-eastern boundary of the site presents as a side boundary to the adjoining property at 89 Miscamble Street. The adjoining property will be buffered by a 1.8m high fence and the boundary will also be landscaped in accordance with the site plan.
The site cover of the proposed development is 42.5% which is marginally in excess of the 40% threshold for accommodation units. By removing one of the units the site coverage of the development will equate to 34% of the total site area. |
PC 31 Residential amenity For Dual Occupancies and Accommodation Units: The location and design of dual occupancies provides for adequate privacy, sunlight, ventilation and open space. |
Each unit is provided with private open space with a minimum area of 56 square metres. There is potential for the private open space areas to be increased with the removal of one of the units. All buildings will be limited to a maximum height of 4.7 metres and one storey to ensure that access to sunlight and ventilation is not obstructed to adjoining properties. |
PC 32 Landscaping For Dual Occupancies and Accommodation Units: Landscaping on the site should be: (a) visually pleasing and create an attractive environment; (b) located to take account of the direction of the breezes and sun; and (c) located to give privacy and buffering from any potential incompatible uses. (d) Located to avoid interference with electricity lines and infrastructure. |
Landscaping will be provided at the rear (north-eastern) boundary, south-eastern side boundary and the Crawford Street frontage of the site to screen the development from adjoining uses and maintain the visual amenity of the site. Landscaping will also be provided throughout the site, along the internal driveway and car parking spaces. |
b) Residential Development - Outbuildings |
|
PC 33 Residential Outbuildings Residential amenity is to be maintained. |
N/A – The proposed development does not incorporate outbuildings |
For Non Residential Activities located in the Residential Zone. |
|
PC 34 - 36
|
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units, which is a residential activity. |
i. C. For the Commercial Zone |
|
PC 37-46 |
N/A – The subject site is located within the Residential Zone. |
ii. D. For the Industrial Zone |
|
PC 47-55 |
N/A – The subject site is located within the Residential Zone. |
iii. E. For the Open Space and Recreation Zone |
|
PC 56-62 |
N/A – The subject site is located within the Residential Zone. |
F. For the Rural Residential Zone |
|
PC 63-64 |
N/A – The subject site is located within the Residential Zone. |
G. For the Special Uses Zone |
|
PC 65-67 |
N/A – The subject site is located within the Residential Zone. |
G. H. Specific Land Uses |
|
PC 68-70 - Caretaker’s Residence |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
PC 71-74 - Community Use |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
PC 75-77 - Home Based Business |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
PC78-81 - Host Home Accommodation |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
PC 82 - Service Station |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
PC 83 - Telecommunication Facility |
N/A – The proposed development is for Accommodation Units. |
Submissions
No submissions were lodged to Council during the public notification period.
Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice |
ADOPTED INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES NOTICE
Issued by Maranoa Regional Council in accordance with:
1. Section 648F of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009
2. State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) 2012
3. Maranoa Regional Council Resolution to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges), 2012 – effective 26 September 2012
4. Development Approval 2012/18195 for a Material Change of Use - Accommodation Units (4 dwelling units) situated at 2 Crawford Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 1 on SP178384.
(a) The amount of the charge:
$63,000.00 is payable as infrastructure charges.
This is based on an adopted charge of $21,000.00 per 3 bedroom dwelling unit.
A discount of $21,000 is applicable based on the monetary equivalent of the existing lawful use of the premises.
(b) The land to which the charge applies:
This charge is levied in respect of a Development Approval for a Material Change of Use - Accommodation Units (4 dwelling units) situated at 2 Crawford Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 1 on SP178384.
(c) The person to whom the charge must be paid:
Chief Executive Officer,
Maranoa Regional Council
(d) When the charge is payable:
Prior to commencing construction of the approved development.
(e) If the local government has, under its adopted infrastructure charges resolution, provided for the charge to increase, an additional amount, worked out in compliance with section 648D(10)(b) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, is payable on the day the charge is paid:
The Maranoa Regional Council Resolution to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) 2102 – effective 26 September 2012, provides for increases in charges to be made in accordance Section 7 of that Resolution. The increases are related to the Consumer Price Index (all Groups) for Brisbane.
ADVICE ABOUT THIS ADOPTED INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES NOTICE (AICN)
When does an AICN lapse?
An AICN lapses if the corresponding development approval or compliance permit stops having effect.
Negotiated AICN
A person who receives an AICN may make a written representation (e.g. a letter, facsimile or email) about the AICN to the entity that gave the notice (i.e. local government or a water distributor retailer) (Chapter 8, Part 4 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA)). If the entity agrees with any of the representations, the entity will issue a negotiated AICN which replaces the original notice.
SPA also provides for representations to be made about decision notices under Chapter 6, Part 8. Where a negotiated decision notice affects the amount of an adopted infrastructure charge, the local government may issue a new AICN to replace the original notice (section 364 of the SPA).
A representation about an AICN or a decision notice must be started during the period within which the person may make an appeal about the AICN or the decision notice.
Permissible change and an AICN
A permissible change, is a minor change to a development approval that would not result in a substantially different development (section 367 of the SPA). An AICN, or negotiated AICN, cannot be issued as part of the process for a permissible change to a development approval. In this regard, a permissible change to a development approval should not result in a change that warrants a new AICN.
Making an appeal about an AICN
A person, who is given an AICN or negotiated AICN and is dissatisfied, may appeal to the Planning and Environment Court (Court) against the notice, under section 478 of the SPA. An appeal against an AICN or a negotiated AICN can only be about:
whether a charge in the notice is so unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local government, state infrastructure provider or coordinating agency could have imposed it; or
an error in the calculation of the charge.
A person has 20 business days to start an appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN.
Another way to appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN is the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee (Committee). The Committee provides an accessible, affordable and timely service for members of the public not satisfied with decisions made by local governments and private certifiers. Errors in the calculation of the charge can be appealed to the Committee, under section 535 of the SPA.
An appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN, to either the Court or the Committees, is not an appeal against a development application, development approval, compliance assessment or compliance permit. As such, an appeal does not affect the period in which the corresponding development approval or compliance permit takes effect and lapses.
FOR YOUR REFERENCE:
Extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009- Section 478
478 Appeals about particular charges for infrastructure
(1) This section applies to a person who has been given, and is dissatisfied with—
(a) an infrastructure charges notice, regulated infrastructure charges notice, adopted infrastructure charges notice or regulated State infrastructure charges notice; or
(b) a negotiated infrastructure charges notice, negotiated regulated infrastructure charges notice, negotiated adopted infrastructure charges notice or negotiated regulated State infrastructure charges notice.
(2) The person may appeal to the court against the notice.
(3) An appeal against a notice mentioned in subsection (1) must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice is given to the person.
(4) An appeal under this section may only be about—
(a) whether a charge in the notice is so unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local government, State infrastructure provider or coordinating agency could have imposed it; or
(b) an error in the calculation of the charge.
To see details of other sections of the Sustainable
Planning Act 2009, you can go to the legislation section of the
Queensland Government website. The following internet link may assist: http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/S/SustPlanA09.pdf http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/S/SustPlanA09.pdf
(5) To remove any
doubt, it is declared that an appeal under this section can not be about the
methodology used to establish an adopted infrastructure charge or the charge in
a relevant infrastructure charges schedule, regulated infrastructure charges
schedule or regulated State infrastructure charges schedule.