Description: Maranoa Logo Process

 

Business Paper

 

General Meeting

 

Wednesday 23 April 2014

 

Roma Administration Centre

 

NOTICE OF MEETING

 

Date: 17 April 2014

 

 

Mayor:                                                   Councillor R S Loughnan

 

Deputy Mayor:                                        Councillor W S Wason

Councillors:                                            Councillor J L Chambers

                                                              Councillor R J Denton

                                                              Councillor P J Flynn

                                                              Councillor W M Newman

                                                              Councillor C J O’Neil

                                                              Councillor M L Price

                                                              Councillor D J Schefe

 

Chief Executive Officer:                          Ms Julie Reitano

 

Senior Management:                               Mr Cameron Castles (Director Infrastructure Services)

                                                              Mr Rob Hayward (Director Development, Facilities & Environmental Services)

                                                              Ms Sharon Frank (Director Corporate, Community & Commercial Services)

 

Officers:                                                 Ms Jane Frith (Coordinator Corporate Communications)

 

Please find attached agenda for the General Meeting to be held at the Roma Administration Centre on April 23, 2014 at 9.00am.

Julie Reitano

Chief Executive Officer

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item       Subject

No

1            Welcome

 

2            Present/Apologies

 

3            Confirmation of Minutes

              General  9 April 2014......................................................................................................... 4

 

4            Business arising from Minutes

 

5            On the Table  

 

6            Presentations/Petitions and Deputations

 

7            Consideration of notices of business

 

8            Consideration of notices of motion  

 

9            Reception of notices of motion for next meeting

 

Reports

 

10          Office of the CEO

 

11          Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

11.1      Council Initiated Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes......................... 27

Prepared by:      Kelly Rogers, Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement

Attachment 1:    Airport Advisory Committee - Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 05/03/14     29

Attachment 2:    Bassett Park Advisory Committee Meeting - Confirmed Minutes - 18/02/14 .................................................................................. 33

 

12          Infrastructure Services

12.1      Naming of New Street...................................................................................... 37

Prepared by:      Kim Edwards, Technical Officer - GIS/CAD

Attachment :      2012/18133 (Approved - C12.386) - Chris Hill C/- Urban & Rural - ROL (1 lot into 14 lots) - Request to change an Existing Approval - 2 South Street, Roma (1RP30965)  -  Amended Site Plan DA   39

 

13          Development, Facilities & Environmental Services

13.1      Expression of Interest for Regional Arts Development Fund for 2014/15      40

Prepared by:      Susan (Sue) Sands, (Acting) Coordinator - Local Development & Council Events

13.2      Mitchell Boat Ramp.......................................................................................... 42

Prepared by:      Fiona Vincent, Coordinator - Sport & Recreation

Attachment 1:    Mitchell boat ramp quote....................................................... 46

Attachment 2:    riverine permit requirements................................................ 56

13.3      Negotiated Decision Notice - Material Change of Use – “Undefined Use” (Non-resident Workforce Accommodation – 360 units) (File: 2013/18679).. 57

Prepared by:      David Fermer, Coordinator - Planning

Attachment 1:    Body of Report........................................................................ 66

Attachment 2:    Applicant's Request for Negotiated Decision Notice....... 68

13.4      Submission of Flood Mitigation Projects under Queensland Government's Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding............................................................... 71

Prepared by:      Susan (Sue) Sands, (Acting) Coordinator - Local Development & Council Events

Attachment :      Disaster Mitigation Funding Options prepared by Ross Drabble April 2014................................................................................ 75

13.5      Material Change of Use to establish Accommodation Units (Two Units) (File: 2013/18803)......................................................................................................... 78

Prepared by:      David Fermer, Coordinator - Planning

Attachment 1:    Report....................................................................................... 88

Attachment 2:    Plans of development......................................................... 102

Attachment 3:    Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice........................... 113

13.6      Surat State School P&C Battery Muster Fundraiser............................. 116

Prepared by:      Cara Cicero, Administration Officer - Waste

13.7      Commerce Roma Request for Financial Support - Visual Merchandising Workshop                                                                                                                              118

Prepared by:      Ryan Gittins, Specialist - Business Development

 

Status Reports

 

14          Office of the CEO

 

15          Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

 

16          Corporate Services

 

17          Infrastructure Services

 

18          Commercial Business

 

19          Building, Facilities & Environmental Services

19.1      Local Builders Group Meeting - 28 March 2014...................................... 121

Prepared by:      Ryan Gittins, Specialist - Business Development

Attachment :      Minutes of Meeting - Local Builders Group - 28 March 2014      123

 

Next General Meeting

 

 

Confidential Items

 

In accordance with the provisions of section 275 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, a local government may resolve to close a meeting to the public to discuss confidential items that it’s Councillors or members consider it necessary to close the meeting.

 

 

C           Confidential Items

C.1        Surat Grain Centre

              Classification:      Closed Access

Local Government  Regulation 2012 Section 275(f) starting or defending legal proceedings involving the local government.

C.2        Request for subsidy/rates concession

              Classification:      Closed Access

Local Government  Regulation 2012 Section 275(d) rating concessions.

C.3        Community Grant Applications

              Classification:      Closed Access

Local Government  Regulation 2012 Section 275(h) other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage.

C.4        GLNG FV1 – CIVIL WORKS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF FAIRVIEW ROAD CH. 0.000KM – 2.400KM INCLUDING UPGRADE OF INTERSECTION AT THE CARNARVON HIGHWAY

              Classification:      Closed Access

Local Government  Regulation 2012 Section 275(e) contracts proposed to be made by it.

 

Councillor Business

 

20          Councillor Business

 

 

Closure


Minutes of the General Meeting of maranoa Regional Council held at Roma Administration Centre on 9 April 2014 commencing at 9.00am

 

ATTENDANCE

 

Deputy Mayor Cr W S Wason chaired the meeting with Cr. J L Chambers, Cr. R J Denton, Cr P J Flynn, Cr. W M Newman, Cr. C J O’Neil, Cr. M L Price, Cr. D J Schefe, Chief Executive Officer – Julie Reitano, Coordinator Corporate Communications – Jane Frith, and Kelly Rogers Minutes Officer in attendance.

 

AS REQUIRED

Director Infrastructure Services – Cameron Castles, Director Corporate, Community & Commercial Services – Sharon Frank, Manager Airports (Roma, Injune, Surat & Mitchell) – Ben Jones, Manager Planning & Building Development – Danielle Pearn, Manager Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services Peter Weallans, Local Development Officer Injune – Amanda Whitney, Engineer – Paul Cummins, Manager Economic & Community Development – Ed Sims.

 

GUESTS

 

There were no guests in attendance at the meeting.

 

WELCOME

 

The Deputy Mayor welcomed all present and declared the meeting open at 9.06am, noting that Cr. Schefe would be a late arrival at the meeting due to his attendance at a meeting with PCYC representatives.

 

APOLOGIES   

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/01

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Chambers

 

That apologies be received and leave of absence granted for Cr. Loughnan for this meeting.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      7/0

 

 

 

Confirmation of Minutes

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/02

Moved Cr Chambers                                                      Seconded Cr Denton  

 

That the minutes of the General Meeting (5-26.03.14) held on 26 March 2014 be confirmed.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      7/0

 

 

Business Arising FROM MiNUTES

 

There was no business arising from the minutes.

 

On the Table

 

There were no items for discussion on the table.

 


Presentations/Petitions and Deputations

 

There were no presentations/petitions or deputations at the meeting.

 

Consideration of notices of business

 

There were no notices of business for consideration.

 

Consideration of notices of motion

 

There were no notices of motion for consideration.

 

Reception of notices of motion for next meeting

 

No notices of motion were received for the next meeting.

 

Business

 

Office of the CEO

 

Item Number:                                    10.1

File Number: D14/22969

Subject Heading:                         Delegation to the Chief Executive Officer

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Sharon Frank, Director - Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

Executive Summary: 

This report sought Council's approval of a delegation under the Local Government Act 2009 to the Chief Executive Officer.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/03

Moved Cr Chambers                                                      Seconded Cr Price  

Council resolves to delegate to the Chief Executive Officer, the exercise of its powers (under the Local Government Act 2009) in the terms of the tabled Instruments of Delegation in relation to the power to sign documents on behalf of Council.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      7/0

 

Responsible Officer

Director - Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

 

Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

 

Cr. Flynn declared a ‘Conflict of Interest’ in the following item due to his personal business operations out of the Roma Airport, and left the Chamber at 9.11am, taking no further part in discussion or debate on the matter.

 

Item Number:                                    11.1

File Number: D14/20467

Subject Heading:                         Queensland Government Air Wing dispute of passenger tax charges

Location:                                          Roma Airport

Applicant:                                         Queensland Government Air Wing

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Ben Jones, Manager - Airports (Roma, Injune, Surat & Mitchell)

Executive Summary: 

Queensland Government Air Wing is disputing Passenger Tax charges issued for the month of October 2013 totalling $404.80 (GST Inclusive). Passenger Tax Charges have never been issued previously, and Council has since late last financial year applied Passenger Tax as charter operators are identified.

 

QLD Government Air Wing has also disputed being classified as a charter aircraft, however, the aircraft is registered to the State of Queensland and has a weight above that which is allowed to park on the General Aviation apron.  For this reason, the aircraft also needs to be accounted for in the flight schedule as availability of parking can be limited with other aircraft using the high strength apron. The aircraft can carry a passenger load of 13 passengers.

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/04

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Denton  

That Council apply the Passenger Tax charges to the QLD Government Air Wing as per the adopted Fees and Charges.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      6/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Airports (Roma, Injune, Surat & Mitchell)

 

At cessation of discussion and debate on the abovementioned item, Cr. Flynn entered the Chamber at 9.12am.

 

Cr. Schefe entered the Chamber at 9.14am.

 

Item Number:                                    11.2

File Number: D14/22738

Subject Heading:                         Consideration of Elected Member Attendance at Conferences

Location:                                          St Lucia, Twin Waters

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Kelly Rogers, Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement

Executive Summary: 

The report sought formalisation of Elected Member attendance at conferences and meetings as part of advocacy activities and/or enhancing strategy and policy development for Maranoa Regional Council.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/05

Moved Cr Denton                                                          Seconded Cr Flynn  

That Council approve the attendance of representing Councillors at the following  upcoming conferences:

 

·    Cr. O’Neil at the UQ School of Architecture Review on 17 April 2014 at the St Lucia UQ Campus in Brisbane;

 

·    Cr. Wendy Newman at the 3rd Local Government Finance Summit on 7 May 2014 at Twin Waters;

 

  • The Mayor at the LGAQ Civic Leaders Summit on 8 – 9 May at Twin Waters.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement

 

 

Infrastructure Services

 

Item Number:                                    12.1

File Number: D14/20431

Subject Heading:                         Change Bassett Court classification from Access Place to Access Street

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Kylie Fleischfresser, Specialist - Infrastructure Planning

Executive Summary: 

Council had received requests seeking clarification of which user has right of way at the intersections of Bassett Court and Edna Street, and Bassett Court and Alexander Avenue.

 

In order to remove ambiguity by installing either regulatory signage or lines, the classification of Bassett Court needs to be changed to give it precedence in the road hierarchy.

 

Discussion:

Cr. O’Neil foreshadowed that he would likely move an amendment to the draft motion pending further technical advice from the Director of Infrastructure Services.  The Chair called for and received a ‘Mover’ and ‘Seconder’ for the draft motion as recorded below, however, no vote was taken on the motion at that time.

 

 

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Newman  

That:

 

  • The classification of Bassett Court be changed to ‘Access’ Street; and,

 

  • The Road Register be amended to reflect this classification change

 

NO VOTE TAKEN

 

 

Discussion Continued:

The Director of Infrastructure Services provided additional technical information for Council’s consideration.  As a result,  Cr. O’Neil moved an amendment to the draft motion, the ‘Seconder’ concurred with the amendments proposed.  The amended draft motion was then put to the vote and the outcome recorded as follows:

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/06

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Newman

 

That:

 

  • The classification of Bassett Court be changed to ‘Access’ Street;

 

  • The Road Register be amended to reflect this classification change;

 

·    Council endorse further investigation for development of traffic calming measures for vehicles travelling on Bassett Court;

 

·    Give way signs be installed on Alexander Avenue & Edna Street (running east-west) immediately.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      5/3

 

Responsible Officer

Specialist – Infrastructure Planning

 

 

 

Item Number:                                    12.2

File Number: D14/22084

Subject Heading:                         Naming of New Street

Location:                                          Roma

Applicant:                                         Ducmar Investments Pty Ltd

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Kim Edwards, Technical Officer - GIS/CAD

Executive Summary: 

A name was sought for the new Street in Stage 1 of the Roma One Development.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/07

Moved Cr Flynn                                                             Seconded Cr O'Neil  

That Council name the new street in the Roma One Development ‘Wormwell Drive.’

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Technical Officer - GIS/CAD

 

 

Development, Facilities & Environmental Services

 

Cr. Wason declared a ‘Conflict of Interest’ in the following item due to him owning the parcel of land on which Mt Saltbush Quarry is sited;  the operation of which sees him entitled to payment of Royalties (funds) for material extracted from the site.  Mt Saltbush Quarry will be a market competitor of the applicant, in the event that Council approve the application presented.  Cr. Wason requested a nomination for the role of Acting Chair, this nomination was received and voted on accordingly.

 

Cr. Wason left the Chamber at 9.27am, taking no further part in discussion or debate on the matter. 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/08

Moved Cr Denton                                                          Seconded Cr Schefe

 

That Cr. O’Neil be nominated ‘Acting Chair’ in the absence of the Deputy Mayor following his declaration of a ‘Conflict of Interest’ in the following item.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      6/0

 

 

 

Item Number:                                    13.1

File Number: D14/20266

Subject Heading:                         Material Change of Use - "Extractive Industry" (2013/18719)

Location:                                          40742 Warrego Highway, Jackson QLD 4426 (Lot 26 on Plan BWR145 and Lot 28 on BWR122)

Applicant:                                         Annejeda Pty Ltd C/- StruXi Design

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Jessica Reiser, Planning Officer

Executive Summary:

The application sought approval for a Material Change of Use - "Extractive Industry”, on land at 40742 Warrego Highway, Jackson QLD 4426 (described as Lot 26 on Plan BWR145 and Lot 28 on Plan BWR122).

 

The application is subject to Impact Assessment against the relevant provisions of Bendemere Shire Planning Scheme 2006 including the Desired Environmental Outcomes and Rural Zone Code. 

 

Public notification was carried out between 6 December 2013 and 10 January 2014.   One submission was received during this period.

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/09

Moved Cr Newman                                                        Seconded Cr Flynn  

 

That Council approve the application for Material Change of Use - "Extractive Industry”, on land at 40742 Warrego Highway, Jackson QLD 4426 (described as Lot 26 on Plan BWR145 and Lot 28 on Plan BWR122), subject to the following conditions:

 

Preamble

 

1.       Refer to http://www.cmdg.com.au for the Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG).

 

2.       The relevant planning scheme for this Development Approval is the Bendemere Shire Planning Scheme 2006. All references to the ‘Planning Scheme’ and ‘Planning Scheme Schedules’ within these conditions refer to the above Planning Scheme.

 

3.       Prior to commencement of use, the applicant shall contact Council to arrange a development compliance inspection.

 

4.       All Aboriginal Cultural Heritage in Queensland is protected under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 and penalty provisions apply for any unauthorized harm.  Under the legislation a person carrying out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal Cultural Heritage.  This applies whether or not such places are recorded in an official register and whether or not they are located in, on or under private land.  The developer is responsible for implementing reasonable and practical measures to ensure the Cultural Heritage Duty of Care Guidelines are met and for obtaining any clearances required from the responsible entity. 

 

5.       Queensland Rural Fire Service has advised construction standards for building in a medium bushfire risk area will apply.  Building construction is to accord with the Building Code of Australia and State Planning Guidelines for building in bushfire prone areas.

 

Use

 

1.       The approved development is a Material Change of Use to establish an Extractive Industry (100,000 tonnes per annum) as shown on the approved plans.

 

2.       All conditions relating to the establishment of the approved development must be fulfilled prior to any approved use commencing, unless otherwise noted within these conditions.

 

 

Approved Plans and Documents

 

3.       Maintain the approved development - Material Change of Use - Extractive Industry (100,000 tonnes per annum), in accordance with the following approved plans, subject to and modified by any conditions of this approval:

Plan/Document number

Plan/Document name

Date

1188.12735 Sheet 002 Issue B

Site Plan

prepared by StruXi design

20/02/13

1188.12735 Sheet 003 Issue B

Locality Plan

prepared by StruXi design

26/02/13

1188.12735 Sheet 101 Issue A

Office Floor Plan

prepared by StruXi design

26/08/13

1188.12735 Sheet 401 Issue A

Office Elevations Sheet 1 of 2

prepared by StruXi design

26/08/13

1188.12735 Sheet 402 Issue A

Office Elevations Sheet 2 of 2

prepared by StruXi design

26/08/13

 

Site Based Management Plan Lot 26 on BWR145 & Lot 28 on BWR122 40742 Warrego Highway, Jackson, QLD 4426 prepared by StruXi design

 

D5

CMDG – Stormwater Drainage Design Guidelines

03/2012

D6

CMDG – Site Regarding Design Guidelines

03/2012?

 

4.       All works must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist (iv) the CMDG, (v) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (vi) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

 

5.       This approval relies on the environmental authority (and its related documents)  applicable to the site to provide the basis for managing environmental impacts and this approval also relies on the entity approving and managing the environmental authority to meet its responsibilities. The Council will not take any responsibility for the management of environmental impacts unless and until the entity (or its legal successors) is unable to act.

 

The standards and approval of civil works and services are the responsibility of the Council but subject to environmental impact management requirements that may be imposed by the environmental authority (or any approval that effectively replaces that environmental authority).

 

Operating Hours

 

6.       Hours of operation, including the transporting of material from the site are restricted to 6:00am to 6:00pm Monday to Saturday. No work is permitted on Sundays or public holidays.

 

The quarry operator may apply to Council to vary the hours of operation for a particular project, where the extended operating hours are essential in the opinion of the Council because of the requirements and community benefits of the particular project. Any Council approval of the varied hours will be restricted to the duration of the project, and may be rescinded by the Council on seven days notice if the extended hours of operation are considered to be causing undue nuisance or disruption to other persons.

 

 

 

 

Amenity

 

7.       Any advertising signage is subject to a further development approval unless compliant with the self-assessable development provisions of the planning scheme.

 

8.       Effluent storage and removal must not have an adverse effect on the surrounding areas and must not cause nuisance to neighbouring properties.

 

9.       Waste containers shall be maintained in a clean and tidy state at all times while the use continues, and shall be emptied, and the waste removed from the site on a regular basis.

 

Avoiding Nuisance

 

10.     The approved development and the premises are to be maintained in a clean and tidy condition and not to pose any health and safety risks to the community.

 

11.     Extraction areas, access and site roadways and surrounds shall be kept in an orderly fashion and free of rubbish.

 

12.     No nuisance is to be caused to adjoining properties and their occupiers by the way of smoke, dust, rubbish, contaminant, stormwater discharge or siltation at any time, including non-working hours.

 

13.     Lighting of the site, including any security lighting, shall be such that the lighting intensity does not exceed 8.0 lux at a distance of 1.5 metres from the site at any property boundary.

 

Earthworks

 

14.     All earthworks for the development shall be undertaken in accordance with Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG) D6 ‘Site Regrading’ Design Guidelines.

 

Erosion Control

 

15.     Erosion and Sediment Control is to be managed as shown in the Site Based Management Plan Section 4.3 prepared by StruXi Design.

 

16.     Any construction works on site are to be undertaken in accordance with the Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction Sites (Institute of Engineers Australia).

 

17.     Where it is necessary for a road and/or drainage system to be reinstated or cleaned up as a result of erosion and/or sedimentation from the site, such works must be undertaken at the developer’s expense.  Such works shall be undertaken immediately, where it is a potential hazard to pedestrians and/or passing traffic.

 

Provision of Services

 

18.     An onsite sewerage system may be installed, and shall be designed in accordance with Schedule 5 – Standards for Sewerage Supply of the Planning Scheme. An additional development permit for plumbing and drainage works shall be sought from Council for any proposed onsite sewerage system.

 

19.     The site must be provided with an on-site water supply with sufficient capacity to meet all operational needs, including watering to minimise dust nuisance.  A potable water supply sufficient to meet the needs of staff and visitors to the site shall also be supplied.

 

20.     All supplies of potable water and disposal of waste water is to be by a suitably licenced contractor.

 

21.     Electrical supply provision may be by onsite generation.

 

Stormwater and Drainage

 

22.     Stormwater, is to be managed as shown in the Site Based Management Plan Section 4.3 prepared by StruXi Design and in accordance with the CMDG – D5 Design Guidelines ‘Stormwater Drainage Design’.

 

23.     The developer shall ensure that in all cases, discharge of stormwater runoff from the development drains freely, and that no nuisance of ponding is created within the vicinity of the development.

 

24.     There shall be no increases in any silt loads or contaminants in any overland flow from the property being developed, either during the development process or after the development has been completed.

 

Access, Car parking and Manoeuvring

 

25.     All weather vehicle access shall be provided for traffic movement within the development site.

 

26.     Unsealed internal roads are to be watered upon receipt of any complaint regarding dust nuisance caused by vehicle movements to and from the site.

 

Environmental Management

 

27.     The Environmental Protection Act 1994 states that a person must not carry out any activity that causes, or is likely to cause, environmental harm unless the person takes all reasonable and practicable measures to prevent or minimise the harm.  Environmental harm includes environmental nuisance.  In this regard, persons and entities involved in the operation of the approved development are to adhere to their ‘general environmental duty’ to minimise the risk of causing environmental harm to adjoining premises.

 

28.     At the end of operations, remediation of the site is to occur in consultation with the landowner, generally in accordance with the program shown in the Site Based Management Plan Section 3.5, (prepared by StruXi Design), and also in accordance with the current Environmental Authorities.

 

29.     The operator is to develop and implement appropriate bushfire mitigation plans for the development site prior to commencement of the use.

 

Conditions if environmental approval ceases to have effect

 

30.     If the environmental approval issued by a State agency to undertake this use on this site ceases to have effect and is not replaced by an appropriate approval, code or law to manage the use and the rehabilitation of the site, then the conditions, requirements and obligations of the original environmental approval given for this use on this site shall become conditions of this approval. References in the original environmental approval to the State agency will then be construed as references to the Council to the greatest extent possible. The standards referenced by the original environmental approval will be the applicable standards.

 

Fees, Infrastructure Charges and Impact Contributions

 

31.     A local roads additional impacts charge will be paid to Maranoa Regional Council in accordance with the Local Roads Additional Impacts Charges Schedule A, attached to and forming part of these conditions.

 

 

32.     All matters contained within this development approval may be covered by infrastructure agreements or deeds of agreement between the relevant parties for each matter.  Only parties which are directly affected by the contents of each infrastructure agreement or deed of agreement need to be parties to the agreements.

 

33.     All fees, rates, interest and other charges levied on the property, shall be paid in accordance with the rate at the time of payment.

 

Complete and Maintain

 

34.     Complete and maintain the approved development as follows: (i) in accordance with development approval documents and (ii) strictly in accordance with those parts of the approved development which have been specified in detail by the Council or Referral Agency unless the Council or Referral Agency agrees in writing that those parts will be adequately complied with by amended specifications.

 

35.     Complete and maintain all operational, building and plumbing and drainage work associated with this development approval, including work required by any of the development approval conditions.

 

Repair Damaged Infrastructure

 

36.     The developer is responsible for locating and protecting any Council and public utility services, infrastructure and assets that may be impacted on during construction of the development.  Any damage to existing infrastructure (road pavement, existing underground assets, signs etc) that is attributable to the progress of works on the site or vehicles associated with the development of the site shall be immediately rectified in accordance with the asset owners’ requirements and specifications and to the satisfaction of the asset owners’ representative(s).

 

37.     Council is to be indemnified against any claims arising from works carried out by the applicant on Council’s property.

 

No Cost to Council

 

38.     The developer is responsible for meeting all costs associated with the approved development unless there is specific agreement by other parties, including the Council, to meeting those costs.

 

39.     All rates and charges of any description and all arrears of such rates and charges, together with interest outstanding thereon, on the land, due to the Council, shall be paid to the Council prior to any approved use commencing.

 

Latest versions

 

40.     Where another condition refers to a specific published standard, manual or guideline, including specifications, drawings, provisions and criteria within those documents, that condition shall be deemed as referring to the latest versions of those publications that are publicly available at the time the first operational works or compliance approval is lodged with the assessment manager or approval agency for those types of works to be performed or approved, unless a regulation or law requires otherwise.

 

Application Documentation

 

41.     It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure all entities associated with this Development Approval have a legible copy of the Decision Notice and the Approved Plans and Approved Documents bearing ‘Council Approval’.

 

Electricity Easement

 

42.     All easement conditions must be maintained.

 

43.     No aspect of the development or activities associated with the development are to occur within the existing easement.

 

44.     No aspect of development is to cause subsidence, ground instability or changes in ground level within the easement area or within 10 metres of either side of the SWER line.

 

45.     Electricity infrastructure within the proposed development site is adequately

protected and Ergon Energy has unrestricted access for maintenance and operation needs. Note: an Ergon Energy lock can be provided.

 

46.     Electrical safety clearances for both the SWER line and 132 kV Powerline must be maintained at all times. All works must comply with the Electrical Safety Act 2002 (the Act). Note: the SWER line may need to be moved to comply with the Act and this condition.

 

47.     No significant increase in airborne pollutants (ie. dust) is to occur as a result of the proposal, to limit adverse impacts on electrical infrastructure.

 

48.     Should changes to Ergon Energy infrastructure be proposed or required, including to the SWER line, as part of the development, those changes are made with Ergon Energy's consent and at the developer/owner's expense.

 

49.     The developer will be required (if needed) to negotiate electricity supply arrangements by applying in writing to Ergon Energy, or by contacting Ergon Energy on 13 10 46. Early contact is recommended. Should the development require permanent electrical distribution infrastructure for its ongoing operations (eg. Pad mounted transformers), early contact with Ergon Energy (ie. prior to detailed design) can ensure any requirements are accounted for in a timely and efficient manner.

 

Charges Schedule A - Local Roads Additional Impacts

 

1.       This condition is required because the development will impact on the local roads when materials associated with the operation of the extractive industry are carried along those local roads. The local roads additional impacts charge covers all roads in the Maranoa Regional Council Area where heavy vehicles of the type used in this activity/use are permitted to travel. The tonnage of extracted material leaving the extractive industry is deemed to be a proportional measure of the total traffic to and from the site.

 

2.       A local roads additional impacts charge of $0.50 per tonne will be paid to Maranoa Regional Council for all extracted material transported from the site. This is the local roads additional impacts charge for the 2013-2014 financial year. Until such time as (1) the methodology is amended or (2) the level of use is changed or (3) Council has amended charges as a result of a review requested by the extractive industry operator, the local roads additional impacts charges amount will be increased or decreased annually by a percentage equivalent to the change in All groups consumer price index for Brisbane published by the Australian Statistician.

 

3.       The payment of the local roads additional impacts charge must be made by the extractive industry operator within 14 days of the end of each 3 month period, with the periods starting with the commencement of the use/activity. The extractive industry operator must calculate the payment and provide details of the calculation. If no payment is made within the set time, the Council may demand payment based on the maximum approved annual production capacity of the activity/use divided by 4.  The maximum approved annual production capacity of the extractive industry will be deemed to be the maximum capacity of the extractive industry listed in the approvals for the site. If the extractive industry operator does not pay the local roads additional impacts charge for two consecutive periods, the Council can require the holder of the development approval to pay the local roads additional impacts charge to the Council.

 

4.       The holder of the development approval or the extractive industry operator may ask for the local roads additional impacts charge to be reviewed once in every three year period after the approval for the activity/use was given. The review will take account of the rates and methodology applying to similar operators in the Council Area and the facts and circumstances applying to this approved activity/use.

 

5.       The Council may review and amend the methodology for calculating the local roads additional impacts charge but any changes resulting from amendments to the methodology will not take effect for a minimum of 2 years from the date of adoption by Council unless the extractive industry operator request earlier changes to the charges.

 

6.       Despite the payment of a local roads additional impacts charge, the Council may stop the extractive industry operator from using particular roads. The reasons may include Council concerns about the level of damage being caused or may be caused to those particular local roads by the addition to total road use of heavy vehicles associated with the extractive industry.

 

7.       Council or its representatives is entitled to inspect, copy and audit any records which may help to prove the actual use of the road network by the extractive industry operator or the approval holder(s) for the purposes of assessing the local roads additional impacts charge. The extractive industry operator and the approval holder(s) have agreed by the acceptance of this condition that the Council has their agreement and permission to access those records wherever held and that their agreement and permission cannot be revoked.

 

8.       These charges can be included within an infrastructure agreement or deed of agreement with the Council, the extractive industry operator and any other relevant parties by consent of the parties. The extractive industry operator, the approval holder and the Council may vary the charges and other factors by mutual consent where circumstances warrant such variations and the community interest is protected.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      7/0

 

Responsible Officer

Planning Officer

 

At cessation of the abovementioned item, Cr. Wason entered the Chamber and assumed the Chair at 9.32am.

 

Item Number:                                    13.2

File Number: D14/20909

Subject Heading:                         Future use of Maranoa Retirement Village Facilities

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Tanya Mansfield, Manager - Facilities

Executive Summary: 

Council had received correspondence from the Booringa Action Group (BAG) enquiring as to Council’s future plans for the former Maranoa Retirement Village buildings and surrounds.  BAG have  requested that the retirement village buildings be used to house a more permanent WORK Camp facility. 

 

As the Maranoa Retirement Village has been closed for nearly 12 months, it is timely that Council now consider the future of the site.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/10

Moved Cr Schefe                                                           Seconded Cr Chambers  

 

That Council:

 

1.    Approach the Department of Justice and Attorney General and commence communications in regard to the WORK program relocating to the former Maranoa Retirement Village.

 

2.    Provide the Maranoa Retirement Village Auxiliary with a timeframe (no later than 30 June 2014) for removal all equipment belonging to the organization with all fixtures to remain on site.

 

3.    Contact the Department of Natural Resources and Mines to explore the opportunity to convert tenure type from reserve to freehold.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Facilities

 

 

Item Number:                                    13.3

File Number: D14/20948

Subject Heading:                         Mandandanji Park Bungil Creek

Location:                                          Roma

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Tanya Mansfield, Manager - Facilities

Executive Summary: 

Mandandanji Cultural Heritage Services Pty Ltd have developed a future development plan for the Mandandanji Park that is being developed near the Bungil Creek bridge crossing on the Warrego Highway Roma.

 

As the park is located on a reserve managed by Council, Council’s formal consideration of the plans were sought.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/11

Moved Cr Price                                                             Seconded Cr Chambers  

 

That Council:

 

1.    Apply to the Department of Natural Resources and Mines to have part of the reserve excised and the type of reserve changed from “Water and Road Reserve” to “Cultural Reserve” or similar.

 

2.    Support in principle Mandandanji Cultural Heritage Services Pty Ltd’s future plans for the site, being construction of a yarning circle, additional display case and toilet block on the site, subject to issues relating to allowable development on this reserve type being resolved.

 

3.    Refer the matter of water connection costs to the 2014/15 budget deliberations.  (Connection costs are estimated at $11,968.44).

 

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Facilities

 

 

Item Number:                                    13.4

File Number: D14/23163

Subject Heading:                         Support for Outback Queensland Tourism Association's application for Contestable Funding.

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Megan Swords, Coordinator - Tourism

Executive Summary: 

The Queensland Government is currently accepting applications from Regional Tourism Organisations, (RTOs) for their 2014/2015 Contestable Grant Scheme. This program provides opportunity for RTOs to apply for additional funding for specific marketing and promotional campaigns.

 

In the 2013/14 financial year, Outback Queensland Tourism Association (OQTA) was successful in their application for a Contestable Grant and was subsequently able to leverage their marketing allocation to obtain an additional $652,000. This funding was used to promote the highly successful “Eventures” campaign.

 

OQTA are inviting all Local Government members and Associations in Outback Queensland to partner with them for additional funding under the RTO Contestable Grant Scheme in 2014/15. Should Council choose to participate, a letter will be required confirming the financial contribution.

 

Based on the 2013/14 budget allocation, this report proposed that if Council chooses to partner with OQTA in their Contestable Grant application, then an amount of $13,000 would be recommended.  At worse case this may be matched $ for $ or at best $ for $1.5.

 

If the application is successful, OQTA will promote “Eventures” as the call to action, providing opportunity for the Maranoa to promote our major events both within and outside of the Outback Queensland region. 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/12

Moved Cr Price                                                             Seconded Cr Newman  

 

That Council:

 

1.   Support Outback Queensland Tourism Association in their application under the RTO Contestable Grant Scheme.

2.   Contribute an amount of $13,000 toward the application of OQTA in the RTO Contestable Grant Scheme 2014/15.

3.   Write a letter of support for the application of OQTA in the RTO Contestable Grant Scheme, confirming their nominated financial contribution.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Tourism

  

 


Status Report

 

Corporate, Community & Commercial Services

 

Item Number:                                    15.1

File Number: D14/19469

Subject Heading:                         Drought Assistance funding - events and programs

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Julie Neil, Manager - Community Services

Month & Year of Report:                    April 2014

Name of Department:                        Community Services

 

Executive Summary: 

The Department of Communities, Child Safety and Disability Services has provided Maranoa Regional Council with $50,000 funding as part of the Drought Relief Assistance Scheme.

 

All events and projects were approved by the Department prior to being committed and delivered. 

 

Confirmed events and projects coordinated throughout the Maranoa Region, and applicable funding allocations were provided to Council for information purposes.

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/13

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Chambers  

That Council receives and notes the Officer’s report as presented.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

 

LATE ITEMS

 

Item Number:                                    L.1

File Number: D14/24368

Subject Heading:                         Letter of Petition - Heavy Vehicle Parking

Location:                                          Garden Street, Yuleba

Applicant:                                         Various Residents

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Kelly Rogers, Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement

Executive Summary: 

A letter of petition had been received from a number of residents residing on Garden Street Yuleba, who are concerned about an increasing volume of trucks turning into Stephensen Street from the highway and travelling along Garden Street. 

 

Residents advise that the heavy vehicles are creating noise and dust at all hours of the night and day, impacting local residents in the vicinity.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/14

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Denton  

That Council:

 

1.       Receive and note the petition tabled;

 

2.       Be provided with a follow up report detailing investigations into the matters raised.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement/Director Infrastructure Services

 

 

Item Number:                                    L.2

File Number: D14/24590

Subject Heading:                         Maranoa Water Supply - pH Correction

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Benjamin (Ben) Godford, Coordinator - Water, Sewerage & Gas Projects, Compliance & Laboratory

Executive Summary: 

Council awarded Tender 14019 to Akwa-Worx Pty Ltd for the supply, installation and commissioning of Chlorine Disinfection Dosing systems at up to 15 sites in towns in the region centred around Roma.

 

Akwa-Worx Pty Ltd have put forward a proposal that will result in significant future cost savings, and increase the effectiveness of the water disinfection process.

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/15

Moved Cr Schefe                                                           Seconded Cr O'Neil  

 

That Council:

 

1.        Incorporate an increase to the expenditure budget of $103,192 (excl. GST) funded by increased water revenue estimates.

 

2.        Award a Variation to Akwa-Worx Pty Ltd, for that amount, for the addition of supply, installation and commissioning of PH correction dosing equipment.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Water, Sewerage & Gas Projects, Compliance & Laboratory/Specialist Strategic Finance

 

 

Subject Heading:        suspension of standing orders

Council adjourned the meeting for morning tea at 10.03am.

 

Subject Heading:        resumption of standing orders

Council resumed the meeting at 10.45am

 


CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

In accord with the provisions of section 275 of the Local Government Regulation 2012, Council resolved to close the meeting to discuss items it has deemed to be of a confidential nature and specifically pertaining to the following sections:-

         

          (a)      the appointment, dismissal or discipline of employees;

          (d)      rating concessions;

          (e)      contracts proposed to be made by it;

          (h)      other business for which a public discussion would be likely to prejudice the interests of the local government or someone else, or enable a person to gain a financial advantage;

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/16

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Newman

 

That Council close the meeting to the public at 10.46am.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

 

Cr. Newman left the Chamber at 10.50am.

Cr. Newman entered the Chamber at 10.53am.

 

Cr. Wason declared a perceived ‘Conflict of Interest’ in item C.2 “Business Activities Report Saleyards and Quarry,” due to him owning the parcel of land on which Mt Saltbush Quarry is sited, the operation of which sees him entitled to payment of Royalties (funds) for material extracted from the site.  Mt Saltbush Quarry is a market competitor of the Council owned and operated Roma Quarry.  Cr. Wason elected to remain in the Chamber for discussion on the matter, on the basis that it would not alter his ability to consider the presented report, which was provided for Council’s information only and a decision was not required.

 

Cr. O’Neil left the Chamber at 11.45am.

Cr. O’Neil entered the Chamber at 11.55am.

 

Cr. Flynn left the Chamber at 12.05pm.

Cr. Flynn entered the Chamber at 12.14pm.

 

 

Subject Heading:        suspension of standing orders

Council adjourned the meeting for lunch at 12.49pm.

 

Subject Heading:        resumption of standing orders

Council resumed the meeting at 1.18pm

 

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/17

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Schefe

That Council open the meeting to the public at 1.36pm.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

 

 

 

Item Number:                                    C.1

File Number: D14/22891

Subject Heading:                         Engagement of Engineering Consultant to provide Engineering Services to assist Council in the delivery of Energy Sector funded Capital Works on selected work packages on Yuleba Taroom Road and Horse Ck Road

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Peter Weallans, Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services

Executive Summary: 

Council is undertaking the project management of substantial capital upgrade works on its road network on behalf of APLNG Origin.

 

The upgrade works involve a number of projects identified in the APLNG Road Impact Assessments (RIA). The total estimated cost of works on the Yuleba Taroom Road, Reedy Creek Road and Horse Creek Road is in the order of $55 million of which approximately $10.5 million has been completed to date.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/18

Moved Cr Schefe                                                           Seconded Cr O'Neil  

 

That Council engage Brandon & Associates Pty Ltd on an hourly rate basis from the Panel of Preferred Suppliers – Engineering Services Arrangement 13/36, to provide Engineering Services associated with the delivery of Council’s Energy Sector funded Capital Works identified as Work Packages WP2d (Yuleba Taroom Road) and WP4 (Horse Creek Road). 

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Infrastructure Contracts & Engineering Services

 

Cr. Wason declared a perceived ‘Conflict of Interest’ in the following item, due to him owning the parcel of land on which Mt Saltbush Quarry is sited, the operation of which sees him entitled to payment of Royalties (funds) for material extracted from the site.  Mt Saltbush Quarry is a market competitor of the Council owned and operated Roma Quarry.  Cr. Wason elected to remain in the Chamber for discussion on the matter, on the basis that it would not alter his ability to consider the presented report, which was provided for Council’s information only and a decision was not required.

 

 

Item Number:                                    C.2

File Number: D14/21126

Subject Heading:                         Business Activity Report - Saleyards and Quarry

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Larissa Pears, Coordinator - Community & Commercial Support & Administration

Month & Year of Report:                    February 2014

Name of Department:                        Commercial Services

 

Executive Summary: 

This monthly report was presented to Council to provide a summary of the performance of Council’s Quarry and Saleyards both over the past month and year to date. The information in this report aims to review the month’s activities, give an overview of financial performance and bring to Council’s attention any emerging issues.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/19

Moved Cr Denton                                                          Seconded Cr Flynn  

 

That Council receive and note the Officer’s report as presented.

 

CARRIED (Cr. Wason voted in favour of the motion)                                                       8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Community & Commercial Support & Administration

 

 

Item Number:                                    C.3

File Number: D14/21567

Subject Heading:                         Application for Rates payment arrangement

Location:                                          Surat

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Dana Harrison, Coordinator - Rates

Executive Summary: 

The applicant has proposed to pay off outstanding rates over a timeframe that exceeds Council’s adopted policy.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/20

Moved Cr Newman                                                        Seconded Cr Chambers  

 

That Council accept the applicant’s proposed payment plan of $500 per month until 30 June 2018 which would repay rates in full (including rates in arrears and estimated future rates).

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Coordinator - Rates

 

 

Item Number:                                    C.4

File Number: D14/24661

Subject Heading:                         Minor Amendments to Organisational Structure

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Julie Reitano, Chief Executive Officer

Executive Summary: 

The report sought Council approval for a  number of recommended minor adjustments to the Organisational Structure.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/21

Moved Cr O'Neil                                                            Seconded Cr Price  

 

That Council approve the following organisational structure amendments:

 

·    Retitle the position of Mungallala – Library Service Officer to Mitchell/Mungallala – Library Service Officer;

 

·    Remove the Mitchell – Library/Gallery Service Officer casual position from the organisational chart;

 

·    Remove two Personal Care Assistant – Wallumbilla positions from the organisational chart due to extended vacancies.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Chief Executive Officer/Manager – Human Resources

 

 

Item Number:                                    C.5

File Number: D14/22375

Subject Heading:                         Young Endeavour Youth Scheme Scholarship 2014

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Amanda Whitney, Local Development Officer - Injune

Executive Summary: 

Maranoa Regional Council offers a Young Endeavour Youth Scheme Scholarship to one young person from the Maranoa Region each year.   Applications for the 2014 scholarship opened on 17 February and closed on 24 March.   Received applications were assessed by the selection panel on 28 March.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/22

Moved Cr Flynn                                                             Seconded Cr Schefe  

 

That Council endorse the panel’s nomination for the 2014 Young Endeavour Scholarship, being Amy Garland.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Local Development Officer - Injune

 

Item Number:                                    C.6

File Number: D14/21797

Subject Heading:                         Roma Saleyards - Service Agreement Renewal Movement of Cattle - Request for Variation to Service Agreement

Applicant:                                         Grumpy Yard Management Pty Ltd

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Sharon Frank, Director - Corporate, Community & Commercial Services/Terrance Hyland, Manager Saleyards

Executive Summary: 

The current Service Agreement for the Movement of Cattle at the Roma Saleyards is due to expire on 30 April 2014.  Council has the option to renew the agreement for a second term at its sole discretion subject to clause 5.2 of the agreement. Furthermore, the current contractor has requested a variation to the agreement.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/23

Moved Cr Chambers                                                      Seconded Cr Flynn  

 

That Council:

 

1.   Exercise the option to renew the Service Agreement for the Movement of Cattle at the Roma Saleyards with Grumpy Yard Management Pty Ltd for a second term of two years commencing 1 May 2014 and expiring 30 April 2016.

 

2.   Agree to vary the Services Agreement, Appendix 2 Service Fee Rates per Head for the Tuesday Liveweight Store Sales and Special Liveweight Store Sales as follows:

 

Tuesday Liveweight Store Sales and Special Liveweight Store Sales

Cattle Numbers

Rate

0 to 750 cattle

$2,245.00

751 to 1,500 cattle

$2.20 per head

1501 to 2000 cattle

$2.00 per head

2001 to 3500 cattle

$1.90 per head

3501 to 5000 cattle

$1.80 per head

5001 to 6500 cattle

$1.65 per head

6501 to 8000 cattle

$1.45 per head

8001 to 9500 cattle

$1.40 per head

9501 to 11000 cattle

$1.35 per head

11001 to 12500 cattle

$1.30 per head

 

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Saleyards

 

 

LATE CONFIDENTIAL ITEMS

 

Item Number:                                    LC.1

File Number: D14/21131

Subject Heading:                         Tender 14020 - Supply, Lay and Compact Asphalt

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Paul Cummins, Engineer

Executive Summary: 

Origin Energy APLNG has funded the upgrade of the intersection between Roma Taroom Road and Wybara Road and Council are completing the construction of these works. Part of this contract involves the supply, laying and compacting of DG14 asphalt. The purpose of this tender is to provide this asphalt surface.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/24

Moved Cr Schefe                                                           Seconded Cr Price  

That Council award Tender and Contract to Boral Resources PTY Limited for the amount of $226,473.78 (excl GST), on the basis that it was considered the most advantageous given the reduced transport requirements.

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Engineer

 

 

Item Number:                                    LC.2

File Number: D14/24468

Subject Heading:                         Stage 1 of Infrastructure Services Restructure

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Julie Reitano, Chief Executive Officer

Executive Summary: 

The report proposed a two stage process, with a view to progressing the changes for two Departments, with further workshops and discussions to occur for Maintenance & Construction.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/25

Moved Cr Chambers                                                      Seconded Cr Flynn  

 

That Council:

 

1.   Approve, for advertising, the new Department of Resource Coordination (selected positions), incorporating Council’s current Plant & Workshop Unit, and additional positions within Infrastructure Planning & Design.

 

2.                Note an additional proposal for a Department of Works (Roads, Drainage & Parks), for further internal consultation.

 

3.                Authorise the Chief Executive Officer or delegate to pursue available resources for the position of ‘Chemical Engineer,’ on a part time basis.

 

4.                If successful in securing a candidate to fill the position of ‘Surveyor,’ commence recruitment for the position of a ‘Chainman.’ (This position complements the skillset and tasks required of an ‘on staff’ Surveyor).  

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      9/0

 

Responsible Officer

Chief Executive Officer/Director Infrastructure Services

 

 

Item Number:                                    LC.3

File Number: D14/24651

Subject Heading:                         Letter from Department of Natural       Resources & Mines

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Julie Reitano, Chief Executive Officer

Executive Summary: 

Tabling of a letter received from the Department of Natural Resources & Mines in relation to Marra Marra Road and associated Permit to Occupy application.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/26

Moved Cr Flynn                                                             Seconded Cr Chambers  

That Council:

 

1.  Note the compliance action requirements to finalise this matter as outlined by the Chief Executive Officer.

 

2.  Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate arrangements with respect to the licensed grid.

 

3.  Make arrangements to remove the Council owned grid within 30 days of the completion of the notified compliance period.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

Item Number:                                    LC.4

File Number: D14/23589

Subject Heading:                         Touch Point Media

Author and Officer’s Title:                 Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development

Executive Summary: 

Council has been approached by a multi-media company which has a concept for an online web portal which is called “Our Town Plus More” (OTPM).  Touch Point Media (TPM) is a consortium of Miller Communications Group and Click Connect.

 

Resolution No. GM/04.2014/27

Moved Cr Flynn                                                             Seconded Cr Schefe  

 

That Council advise the Department of Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts (DSITIA) that it is in an advanced stage of development of its own regional portal and as a consequence has declined participation in the Touch Point Media (TPM) “Online Regional System” pilot project which is being entertained for sponsorship by the DSITIA.

 

CARRIED                                                                                                                      8/0

 

Responsible Officer

Manager - Economic & Community Development

 

 

CLOSURE

 

There being no further business, the Deputy Mayor thanked Council for their attendance and declared the meeting closed at 2.03pm.

                                 

 

These Minutes are to be confirmed at the next General Meeting of Council to be held on 23 April 2014, at Roma Administration Centre.

 

 

 

 

...............……….................                                                      ..................................

Deputy Mayor.                                                                          Date.

 

 

     


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 11.1

File Number: D14/26824

 

Subject Heading:                     Council Initiated Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                          N/a

Location:                                            N/a

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Kelly Rogers, Coordinator - Elected Members & Community Engagement

 

Executive Summary: 

As part of Council’s Draft Community Engagement Strategy, Council has initiated a number of Advisory Committees to seek community and stakeholder input on key projects and businesses of Council.  Feedback, or the outcomes of these forums, assists Council to identify priorities, inform decisions and develop future strategies and policies.

 

This report provides a copy of the confirmed meeting minutes of the advisory committees that held meeting during the months of February 2014 – March 2014.  

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council receive and note the confirmed minutes of the following Advisory Committee Meetings:

 

·    Airport Advisory Committee Meetings – 05/03/14

·    Bassett Park Advisory Committee – 18/2/14

 

 

Body of Report:

Council initiated advisory committee meeting minutes are circulated to Councilors on a monthly basis to ensure Council is aware of committee items discussed.

 

The most recent confirmed minutes of each of the committees that have convened during the months of February 2014 – March 2014 are attached, these being:

 

·    Airport Advisory Committee Meetings – 05/03/14

·    Bassett Park Advisory Committee – 18/2/14

Specific recommendations requiring Council’s consideration will continue to be put forward by the Chair, or attending Councillor representative on an ‘as needs’ basis.

 

Consultation (internal/external):

MRC Councillors  & Committee Chairs

Designated Committee Minute Officers

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

The formation of Council initiated committees is a positive forum in which to engage the community and key stakeholders on Council projects and business areas.

Policy Implications:

MRC Draft Community Engagement Framework

Financial Resource Implications:

Operational resourcing costs

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.1.1(a) To undertake all governance functions and activities in a professional manner promoting corporate ethics and integrity and informed decision making practices so as foster an operating environment advocating fairness, equity and consistency.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Airport Advisory Committee - Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 05/03/14

d14/15363

2View

Bassett Park Advisory Committee Meeting - Confirmed Minutes - 18/02/14

d14/26822

 

Report authorised by:

Dale Waldron, Manager - Administration & Information Services

Sharon Frank, Director - Community & Commercial Services


Attachment 1

Airport Advisory Committee - Confirmed Meeting Minutes - 05/03/14

 

 

Meeting:                                 Airports Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                                       Wednesday 5 March 2014

Chair:                                     Cr. Joy Denton                       

Attendees:                             Cr. Joy Denton, Ben Jones MRC – Manager Airports (Roma, Injune & Surat), Barry McCabe – Roma Aero Club, Greg Shaw, Lyn Kajewski – Roma Tourism Association Inc, Richard Benham  – Commerce Roma, Meryl Brumpton – Flying Surgical and Flying Obstetric Service, 

 

Apologies:                             Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. David Schefe,  Peter Flynn – Maranoa Travel Centre, Adrian Harding – Europcar, Vicki Beitz, Ian Rollinson, Shane Brumby – MI Helicopters, Robert Lethbridge, Keith Chandler, Anthony Partridge – TransLink, Anthony McDonald – Hertz Roma, Christopher Kerr – Care Flight Group QLD, Scott Rodgers – Air BP, Jon Hamer - Qantas

 

 

Minutes:                                 Christina Tincknell

 

Meeting Opened:                                                                                                                       6:00pm

Meeting Closed:                   6:50pm

 

Next Meeting Details

Date:                       2 April 2014                            

Time:                      6pm        

Location:               Council Chambers, Bungil Street           


Meeting Actions

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

Item 2

Confirmation of Minutes & Business Arising

Present to Council the proposal of the passenger tax being applied to charter aircraft utilising Injune Airport

Cr. Joy Denton

12th March 2014

Consult with Kelly Rodgers regarding the committee being regarded as a Statuary Body

Ben Jones

By 2nd April 2014

Item 3

Tourism Billboard & Tourism Promotion

Lyn Kajewski to coordinate meeting between Ben Jones and Megan Swords for tourism billboard

Lyn Kajewski

By 2nd April 2014

Item 5

General Business

Present to Council the proposed sale of the council drink vending machine to the Roma Aero Club.

Cr. Joy Denton

12th March 2014

Installation of VASI lights at Roma Airport

Ben Jones

Ongoing

 Follow up with Nektar regarding new menu items for airport kiosk

Ben Jones

10th March 2014

Refund RFDS and Careflight landing charges for Maranoa Regional Council Airports

Christina Tincknell

By 2nd April 2014

 

Discussion Notes:

 

Welcome

Cr. Denton welcomed all present and declared the meeting open at

 

Item 1                     Apologies

The following apologies were noted at the commencement of the meeting;

·      Vicki Beitz

·      Jon Hamer – Qantas

·      Rob Lethbridge

·      Anthony Partridge – TransLink

·      Keith Chandler

 

Item 2                     Confirmation of Minutes and Business Arising

Resolution:           AP/03.2014/09

Moved:                   Greg Shaw            

Seconded:             Barry McCabe

That the Airport Advisory Committee Meeting minutes of 5 February 2014 be confirmed.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


The committee requested feedback on the proposal to charge passenger tax for charters at Injune Airport. Ben advised that the item is to be presented at the next Council meeting on 12th March 2014.

 

The Committee requested feedback on the proposed sale of the council drink vending machine to the Roma Aero Club. Ben advised that the item is to be presented at the next Council meeting on 12th March 2014.

 

Committee discussed the Terms of Reference for the committee, all members in attendance agreed that they do not wish for the committee to be classified as a statutory body.  Ben is to consult with Kelly and receive in writing the current status of the committee. This is to be presented at the next meeting for the committee to review the Terms of Reference for amendment.

 

Item 3                     Tourism Billboard & Tourism Promotion

Lyn Kajewski met with Megan Swords Coordinator – Tourism, to develop a tourism billboard to be placed at the baggage collection area of the Roma Airport. It is intended that the billboard will promote events and services in the region. The committee discussed the concept at length and agreed the Megan and Ben will need to meet to discuss further and decide on the best location for signage. Lyn advised that she would coordinate the meeting.

 

Item 4                     General Business

Greg Shaw asked if there had been any further progress on the installation of the VASI lights for Roma Airport. Ben advised that he is currently awaiting quotes on the equipment and the management of the installation. Ben is aiming that pending receiving the requested quotes in a timely manner, installation should commence this month. From there Ben anticipates approximately 1 month to complete the project, however this will depend on feedback provided when installation commences. Ben advised that he will keep the committee updated on the progress.

 

Greg Shaw noted that the congestion at the Roma Airport for air traffic has increased significantly; he suggested that Council consider building a taxiway to the end of runway 36 so aircraft can avoid back tracking along the runway. 

 

Ben advised the committee on the recent Office of Transport Security (OTS) audit at Roma Airport. The audit included reviewing the Visitor Identification Card records, management records and a systems test at the screening point.

 

The audit was successful and the systems test was passed again. This is the fifth systems test conducted since February 2013 and each one has been a 100% pass.

 

Cr. Denton asked Ben if he had been able to resolve the complaint that was in the Western Star. Ben advised that he has not been able to contact the passenger as yet. Ben has been consulting with Wayne Bryant, the Baggage Handling Agent Manager for QantasLink at Roma Airport and as yet has not been able to identify the passenger.

 

Ben advised the committee on the recent Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) level two surveillance at Roma Airport. There was one item noted in the surveillance, a runway light located at the cross strip did not meet requirement as it sat to low. The light has been levelled with the runway and meets the required standard.

 

Ben advised the committee that a drain has been installed in the vicinity of the Aero Club to stop rain water flowing under the Aero Club building. Airport staff will be monitoring the area to ensure that no further leak is occurring.

 

Ben provided committee members an update on reportable incidents over the past month since the committee last convened.

 

The committee requested an update on the terminal and car park design. Ben advised that the preliminary designs should be received by 13th March; this will be both the terminal and the car park designs. Once the designs have been received then an engineering review will be completed and the designs will be presented to council.

The committee requested feedback on the possible Qantas lounge to be included in the terminal. Ben advised that he has had no further contact from Qantas after a discussion several months ago. Qantas requested a price for the lounge and Ben asked them to provide a list of what they required within the lounge, such as amenities, water etc.

 

The committee requested an update on the new menu items that were to be provided by Nektar at the airport kiosk. The committee were advised that the new menu items were intended to begin from approximately 20th February but as yet have not commenced. The committee did not think this was satisfactory and requested follow up on this.

 

Ben advised the committee of the recent announcement regarding the Roma - Brisbane, Roma - Charleville route. The route will continue to be regulated with QantasLink the current service provider – the route will be retendered in 2015. The committee discussed the route regulation at length.

 

The committee requested feedback on the progress of refunding RFDS and Careflight for landing charges at Council’s airports. Ben advised that the process has not yet been finished due to unexpected leave of staff working on the issue. It is intended that this will be completed by the end of the month.

 

Meryl Brumpton requested that action items still in progress be carried over to the next meeting so that committee members know when an action item is still on-going. The committee agreed this was a beneficial method of keeping track of outstanding meeting actions.

 

Item 5                     Next Meeting Date & Close

The Committee scheduled the next meeting for 2 April 2014 commencing 6pm, to be held at the Council Chambers. Greg Shaw noted that he would be an apology for the next meeting. The meeting was closed at 6:50pm.        

 

 

 

...............................................                                                                                         .............................................

Chair                                                                                                                                               Date

 


Attachment 2

Bassett Park Advisory Committee Meeting - Confirmed Minutes - 18/02/14

 

 

Meeting:                     Bassett Park Master Planning Advisory Committee Meeting

Date:                           18 February 2014

Chair:                         Cr. Cameron O’Neil   

Attendees:                 Cr. Cameron O’Neil, Cr. Peter Flynn, Rob Hayward, Fiona Vincent, Emily Rogers, Carla Cosgrove, Kevin Pope, Mark Brandt, Jackie Erickson, Jim Schefe, Paul Robertson, Fay Robertson, John Mulcahy, James McAuley, Ranald Ferrier, Tina Hamilton, Shirley Ayers.           

 

Apologies                  Alistair Brown, Lorinda Otto, Cassandra Elder, Bill McClean, Lucy Warby, Loretta Thomas, Yoland Thomas, Sussan Evans, Angela Lorenz, Linda Arnold, Jason Coonan, Craig Smith, Greg Stewart, Sandy Wendt, , Kathy Mitchell, Shirley Ayers, Dayle Little & Tina Hamilton.

 

Minutes:                     Robert Hayward

 

Meeting Opened:      6.10pm

Meeting Closed:        7.30pm

 

Next Meeting Details

 

Date:                           Tuesday 15 April 2014

Time:                          6.00pm           

Location:                    Bassett Park Members Bar

 

 

 

 

Meeting Actions

 

Item

Description

Comments

Action by

When

2.0

Confirmation of Minutes

Meeting minutes to be signed by Chair, placed on Council’s website and presented to Council at the second General Meeting 26/03/14.

Kelly Rogers

26/03/14

3.0

Terms of Reference

Terms of Reference are updated to adjust meeting schedule to ‘Bi-monthly & the committee name be adjusted to “The Bassett Park Advisory Committee.”

Kelly Rogers

12/04/14

4.0

&

5.0

Prioritisation of Bassett Park Master Plan Implementation

That: The existing building/structure housing the Bar be retained;

Each of the clubs to provide feedback on potential the following items for return to Council Officer’s by Friday 14 March 2014:

 

Proposed main bar upgrade – consideration to be given to ergonomics for workers and workable flow for patrons

Staging of Equestrian Complex – what comes first (if applicable to your group)

Items for consideration in a User Agreement between your group and Council

Fiona Vincent/Emily Rogers/All

14/03/14

Facility lighting upgrade and upgrade of the P.A. system (including portability) be escalated to a “high” priority project.

Rob Hayward/Fiona Vincent

TBC

6.0

General Business

Attending Camp draft members requested a weather proof cover be installed around the bar area.

Fiona Vincent

TBC

Toilet block locations and portability at the facility be reviewed;

Fiona Vincent

TBC

It was requested that access during events be considered through the distribution of a calendar of events & that this be issued 1 month in advance to trainers.  It was suggested that track work be completed by 7.00am on event days.

Fiona Vincent

TBC

It was requested that top dressing be supplied in the Rodeo Arena and that the replacement of blown bulbs be completed to restore lighting capability.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Cr. Flynn recommended that the male toilets next to the viewing area be upgraded/painted.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Cr. O’Neil requested the northern end of the Wool Pavilion be painted and a check done with respect to the presence of any asbestos sheeting that is damaged and requires removal.    

Cr. O’Neil requested the signage on the sheep yard be restored/painted.

Rob Hayward

TBC

Discussion Notes:

 

Item 2               Confirmation of Minutes

 

Resolution Number BP.01.14

 

Moved  Carla Cosgrove                                                                                     Seconded Jackie Erickson

 

That the minutes of the Bassett Park Advisory Committee Meeting held on 16 September 2013 be confirmed as presented.

 

CARRIED

 

Item 4               Proposed Bar Upgrade

 

Chair, Cr. Cameron O’Neil provided outline of option to retain the existing structure and refit, as an alternative to building a new one.

 

Resolution Number BP.02.14

Moved  Mark Brandt                                                                                          Seconded Carla Cosgrove

 

That:

 

1.   The existing building/structure housing the Bar be retained; and

2.   Each of the clubs provide feedback on potential the following items for return to Council Officer’s by Friday 14 March 2014:

 

·      Proposed main bar upgrade – consideration to be given to ergonomics for workers and workable flow for patrons

·      Staging of Equestrian Complex – what comes first (if applicable to your group)

·      Items for consideration in a User Agreement between your group and Council

 

CARRIED

 

 

Item 5               Prioritisation of Bassett Park Master Plan Implementation

 

Attending members reviewed and broadly discussed the Council prioritised list of projects as part of the endorsed Bassett Park Master Plan.

It was agreed that Council Officer’s consult with each of the user groups to determine each group’s priorities and in consideration of the Council prioritised list. 

 

 

Resolution Number BP.03.14

 

Moved  Carla Cosgrove                                                                                     Seconded John Mulcahy

 

That facility lighting upgrade and upgrade of the P.A. system (including portability) be escalated to a “high” priority project.

 

CARRIED

 

 

Item 3               Committee Membership/meeting frequency & Terms of Reference Review

 

Those in attendance discussed the current Terms of Reference for the committee, determining that meeting frequency be adjusted as agreed below:

 

Resolution Number BP.04.14

 

Moved  Kevin Pope                                                                                           Seconded Jackie Erickson

 

That the committee meeting frequency be adjusted to a ‘bi- monthly’ occurrence, and the committee be named “The Bassett Park Advisory Committee.”

 

CARRIED

 

 

Item 6               General Business

 

·      Attending Camp Draft members requested a weather proof cover be installed around the bar area.

·      Toilet block locations and portability at the facility be reviewed;

·      It was requested that access during events be considered through the distribution of a calendar of events & that this be issued 1 month in advance to trainers.  It was suggested that track work be completed by 7.00am on event days.

·      It was requested that top dressing be supplied in the Rodeo Arena and that the replacement of blown bulbs be completed to restore lighting capability.

·      Cr. Flynn recommended that the male toilets next to the viewing area be upgraded/painted.

·      Cr. O’Neil requested the northern end of the Wool Pavilion be painted and a check done with respect to the presence of any asbestos sheeting that is damaged and requires removal.    

·      Cr. O’Neil requested the signage on the sheep yard be restored/painted.

 

Chair:  ..........................................................                                                                            Date:            ..........................................

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 7 April 2014

Item Number: 12.1

File Number: D14/23972

 

Subject Heading:                     Naming of New Street

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                          Chris Hill

Location:                                            Roma

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Kim Edwards, Technical Officer - GIS/CAD

 

Executive Summary: 

A request has been received to name a new street created as part of the development at 6 South Street, Roma.

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council name the new road created as part of the development at 6 South Street Bottletree Court.

 

 

Body of Report:

Council has received a request from Chris Hill seeking a name for the new street to be created as part of the subdivision of land at 6 South Street, Roma. The unnamed street is required to be named before addressing numbers can be provided and to support emergency service access.

The developer has suggested the street be named Bottletree Court. This name was taken to the Councilor Workshop on 16 April 2014.

A plan showing the location of the street to be named is attached.

Consultation (internal/external):

Kym Downey – Manager Infrastructure Planning & Design

Chris Hill

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

Nil

Policy Implications:

Nil

Financial Resource Implications:

Nil

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.5.1(a) To provide professional and technical engineering advice and support for Council in an effective and timely
manner.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

2012/18133 (Approved - C12.386) - Chris Hill C/- Urban & Rural - ROL (1 lot into 14 lots) - Request to change an Existing Approval - 2 South Street, Roma (1RP30965)  -  Amended Site Plan DA

D12/14390

 

Report authorised by:

Cameron Castles, Director - Infrastructure Services


Attachment 1

2012/18133 (Approved - C12.386) - Chris Hill C/- Urban & Rural - ROL (1 lot into 14 lots) - Request to change an Existing Approval - 2 South Street, Roma (1RP30965)  -  Amended Site Plan DA

 

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 4 February 2014

Item Number: 13.1

File Number: D14/6775

 

Subject Heading:                     Expression of Interest for Regional Arts Development Fund for 2014/15

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                         

Location:                                           

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Susan (Sue) Sands, (Acting) Coordinator - Local Development & Council Events

 

Executive Summary: 

Maranoa Regional Council has been asked to submit an Expression of Interest to Arts Queensland to request  funding for the 2014/15 RADF Program.

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council approve the submission of an Expression of Interest to Arts Queensland for $30,000 for RADF funding in 2014/15 and provide the required contribution of $12,857 from Council’s 2014/15 budget allocations.

 

Body of Report:

Arts Queensland is implementing a simplified process for allocation of RADF funding to councils in 2014/15.  Councils are being asked to provide an Expression of Interest, rather than an Annual Bid.

 

Maranoa Regional Council received $30,000 in the 2013/14 RADF allocation, and provided the required contribution of $12,857 in a 70:30 ratio.   This allocation is based on our population (class 2).

 

It is recommended that Council submit the following Expression of Interest by the due date of 1 May 2014:

Request from Arts Qld (can not be more than previously provided):              $30,000

Required contribution from Council:                                                                    $12,857

Total available for RADF projects in 2014/15:                                                    $42,857

 

Council has successfully disbursed all the RADF funds for the 2013/14 financial year and there are no carry-over funds.

Consultation (internal/external):

Maranoa Regional Council RADF Committee

Suzanne Matulich, RADF Officer, Arts Queensland

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

A contribution of $12,857 is required from Council to ensure an allocation from Arts Queensland.  Failure to provide the required funds in the 2014/15 budget will place the RADF program at risk.

Policy Implications:

The RADF program is identified as an objective in the Council Arts and Culture policy.

Financial Resource Implications:

Request from Arts Qld (can not be more than previously provided):              $30,000

Required contribution from Council:                                                                    $12,857

Total available for RADF projects in 2014/15:                                                    $42,857

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.4.3(a) To develop community capacity and encourage community engagement so as to address identified needs and opportunities to enhance the quality of life and wellbeing for residents of our region

Supporting Documentation:

Nil

Report authorised by:

Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 7 April 2014

Item Number: 13.2

File Number: D14/23919

 

Subject Heading:                     Mitchell Boat Ramp

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                         

Location:                                           

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Fiona Vincent, Coordinator - Sport & Recreation

 

Executive Summary: 

Maranoa residents have raised the importance of replacing the unsealed boat ramp with a concrete boat ramp on the Maranoa River at Fisherman’s Rest, Mitchell. This would avoid damage occurring to personal equipment and most importantly safer and easier access to the water.

Due to the extremely low water level currently being experienced in the Maranoa River, the ramp is exceptionally steep, undermined at the water line and very unsafe, although residents and visitors continue to unload boats and jet skis into the River at this location proving what a popular amenity this is. Installation of the ramp with a diminished water line will allow an extended ramp exit to the waterline.

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council approve the installation of a concrete boat ramp at Fisherman’s Rest, Mitchell.

 

 

Body of Report:

Local residents have on numerous occasions raised the importance of having a concrete boat ramp, due to the dirt ramp being unusable in wet weather, erodes badly after heavy rain, is very steep when the River level drops and an upgrade would include appropriate signage on safe usage of the amenity.

 

The need for this upgrade is critical at present due to an increase in Maranoa residents using the Maranoa River.  This may be in part due to Lake Never Fill having a cost associated with use (access via a paid gate key) and the Lake’s low water level.

 

Keith Harrison, local Mitchell builder has provided Council staff with a very fair quote charging for the materials and donating almost all of the labour, in the hope that if the project can be finalised, residents will have safe water access as the number of community members who have boats and jet skis increases. Keith has his own interest as presently his personal boat ramp is being adversely affected with overuse.

 

Sun Water has been contacted and as the area in question is outside of their Weir pool, they do not have an interest in the project.

 

DERM Toowoomba staff has been contacted and have advised that Council is able to install the ramp without the need for a permit under the attached Riverine Protection Exemption Requirements. No prior approval is required from DERM, provided the boat ramp is installed according to the minimum requirements in Section 4 of the Requirements.

 

Local Development Officer, Jane Fenton has been surveying local resident’s ideas and concerns of the current ramp. One question asked was whether there was a need for a double access ramp. The general consensus is that a single ramp is ample due to wait periods to access the facility being non existent.

 

Local residents are putting people in the water to hold the rear of the craft out of the water until the front can be lowered into the water at the same time as the rear while unloading and loading boats. Locals have been asked about the positioning of the ramp and have specified that the current location works well.

 

Aurecon staff has advised that FKG have the tender to repair flood damage to the Mitchell River Walk. This will see reinstatement of the shade shelter and bins at Fisherman’s Rest, so the ramp would tie in nicely with these restoration works.

 

 

 

photo (4)

 

Consultation (internal/external):

Ed Sims, Manager Economic & Community Development

Jane Fenton, Local Development Officer, Mitchell

Susan Sands, Specialist Grants (Council & Community)

Tanya Mansfield, Manager Facilities

Kay Crosby, Manager Environmental Health, Compliance & Waste

Mark Westbrook, Coordinator Building Certification

Robert Hayward, Director Development, Facilities & Environmental Services

Keith Harrison, Director KHB Builders Mitchell

Karen Quartermaine, Sun Water St George

Tessa Lever, Technical Officer, Water Services, DERM Toowoomba

Selection of local residents who utilise the ramp

 

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

Tanya Mansfield has advised Council are covered with present insurance and have a duty of care to users as Council are aware of the heavy usage at this recreational spot on the Maranoa River.

Policy Implications:

<provide detail or state 'Nil'>

Financial Resource Implications:

$7800 ramp and $400 for signage

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.4.5(a) To develop partnerships to cultivate and facilitate sporting and recreational opportunities to meet the community’s needs and aspirations so as to enhance the quality of life and wellbeing for residents of our region.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Mitchell boat ramp quote

D14/26222

2View

riverine permit requirements

D14/26252

 

Report authorised by:

Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development


Attachment 1

Mitchell boat ramp quote

 











Attachment 2

riverine permit requirements

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 15 April 2014

Item Number: 13.3

File Number: D14/26370

 

Subject Heading:                     Negotiated Decision Notice - Material Change of Use – “Undefined Use” (Non-resident Workforce Accommodation – 360 units) (File: 2013/18679)

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                          ADAMS + SPARKES Town Planning & Development

Location:                                            Yuleba Taroom Road, Yuleba North QLD 4427 (Lot: 22 SP: 248280)

Author & Officer’s Title:                 David Fermer, Coordinator - Planning

 

Executive Summary:  The applicant has submitted a request for a Negotiated Decision Notice under s361(1)(a) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, in relation to the Development Permit for Material Change of Use – “Undefined Use”  (Non-resident Workforce Accommodation – 360 units), at Yuleba Taroom Road, Yuleba North QLD 4427.

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  That the applicant be advised that the request for a negotiated decision for Development Permit No.2013/18679 has been considered, and Council has decided the following with regard to the negotiated matters:

 

            (i)         the request to amend Conditions 4, 7, 8, 16, 23, 24, 26, 31, 45, and 47                    is declined;

            (ii)        the request to amend Condition 22 is approved;

 

and, that the application now be approved subject to the following amended conditions:

 

Preamble

 

1.    Refer to http://www.cmdg.com.au/ for the Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG).

 

Complete and Maintain

 

1.    Complete and maintain the approved development as follows: (i) generally in accordance with development approval documents and (ii) strictly in accordance with those parts of the approved development which have been specified in detail by the Council or Referral Agency unless the Council or Referral Agency agrees in writing that those parts will be adequately complied with by amended specifications

 

2.    Complete and maintain all operational, building and plumbing and drainage work associated with this development approval, including work required by any of the development approval conditions.

 

3.    Maintain the approved development being Material Change of Use – “Undefined Use” (Non-resident Workforce Accommodation – 360 Units), generally in accordance with the approved plans and documents:

Plan/Document number

Plan/Document name

Date

0001 – Rev B

Reedy Creek Proposed Workers Camp Figure 1: Site Plan

7 June 2013

0002 – Rev A

Reedy Creek Proposed Workers Camp Figure 2: Locality Map

6 June 2013

Map/13/01 – DA01

Proposed Camp Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA02

Detailed Camp Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA03

Camp Area 1 Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA04

Camp Area 2 Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA05

Camp Area 3 Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA06

Camp Area 4 Site Plan

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA07

Car Parking Layout

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA08

Building Types / Floor Plans & Elevations

31 July 2013

Map/13/01 – DA09

Building Types / Floor Plans & Elevations

31 July 2013

SK1295 – Rev A

Upgrade of Yuleba Taroom Road Intersection

22 October 2013

Version 1

Site Based Management Plan for “Seven Trees” Accommodation Camp

June 2013

 

4.    During the course of constructing the works, the developer shall ensure that all works are carried out by appropriately qualified persons and the developer and the persons carrying out and supervising the work shall be responsible for all aspects of the works, including public and worker safety, and shall ensure adequate barricades, signage and other warning devices are in place at all times.

 

5.    All civil and related work shall be designed and supervised by RPEQ Registered Professional Engineers of Queensland (RPEQ) who are competent in the construction of the works.

 

6.    All works on or near roadways shall be adequately signed in accordance with the “Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices – Part 3, Works on Roads”.

 

7.    The developer is responsible for locating and protecting any Council and public utility services, infrastructure and assets that may be impacted on during construction of the development.  Any damage to existing infrastructure (kerb, road pavement, existing underground assets, etc) that is attributable to the progress of works on the site or vehicles associated with the development of the site shall be immediately rectified in accordance with the asset owners’ requirements and specifications and to the satisfaction of the asset owners’ representative(s).

 

8.    All works must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist (iv) the CMDG, (v) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (vi) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

 

Latest Versions

 

9.    Where another condition refers to a specific published standard, manual or guideline, including specifications, drawings, provisions and criteria within those documents, that condition shall be deemed as referring to the latest versions of those publications that are publicly available at the time the first operational works or compliance approval is lodged with the assessment manager or approval agency for those types of works to be performed or approved, unless a regulation or law requires otherwise.

 

Site Works

 

10.  Any construction works on site are to be undertaken in accordance with the Institute of Engineers (Australia) (IEAUST) Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction sites.

 

Stormwater Drainage

 

11.  On-site stormwater drainage is to be constructed in accordance with the Queensland Urban Drainage Manual (QUDM) (Volume 1 text, Volume 2 Design Charts), Australian Rainfall and Runoff (Volume 1 A guide to Flood Estimation) and CMDG – D5 Design Guidelines ‘Stormwater Drainage Design’.

 

12.  Stormwater must not be allowed to pond on the property being developed during the development process and after development has been completed unless the type and size of ponding has been agreed in writing by the Council or as a specific development approval condition.

 

13.  There must be no increases in any silt loads or contaminants in any overland flow from the property being developed during the development process and after the development has been completed.

 

14.  The stormwater disposal system must be designed to include appropriate pollution control devices or methods to ensure no contamination or silting of creeks or other waterways.

 

Earthworks

 

15.  All construction works on site to be undertaken in accordance with the Institute of Engineers (Australia) (IEAUST) Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction sites and the CMDG Design Guidelines – D7.

 

Erosion Control

 

16.  If there is a possibility of erosion or silt or other materials being washed off the property being developed during the development process, the developer must document and implement a management plan that prevents this from occurring.  Erosion and sediment controls shall be maintained at all times during the course of the project.  Should the proposed controls prove to be ineffective, the developer must install additional measures and provide written notice to Council advising of the additional control measures implemented.

 

17.  During construction stockpiles of topsoil, sand, aggregate, spoil or other material capable of being moved by the action of running water shall be stored clear of drainage paths and be prevented from entering the road and/or drainage system.

 

18.  Measures shall be applied to prevent site vehicles tracking sediment and other pollutants onto adjoining roads during the course of the construction period and to prevent dust nuisance during construction.

 

19.  Should it be necessary for the road and/or drainage system to be reinstated or cleaned up due to erosion and/or sedimentation from the site, then such works shall be undertaken at no cost to Council.  Such works shall be undertaken immediately where there is a potential hazard to pedestrians and/or passing traffic.

 

Service Provisions

 

20.  Reticulated sewerage is unavailable to the development site.  All onsite sewerage systems are to comply with On Site Sewerage Code DNRM AS1547.2000 and On-Site Sewerage Facilities Guidelines for Effluent Quality DNRM.

 

21.  The site must be provided with on-site water supply with sufficient capacity to meet operational needs, including a minimum of 20,000L capacity exclusively for fire-fighting purposes.

 

22.  The development is to be connected to a camp generator room or an alternative electricity supply service.

 

23.  All services installation, including water, sewerage, electricity and telecommunications connections to the respective networks, must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist  (iv) the CMDG, (v) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (vi) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

 

Access, Roads, Landscaping and Lighting

 

24.  The landowner shall be responsible for construction and maintenance of vehicle crossovers from the road carriageway to the property boundary and for obtaining any approvals that may be required and for complying with the applicable designs and standards.

 

25.  A sealed access is to be constructed to the property boundary incorporating the widening of the Yuleba-Taroom Road with dimensions as shown on drawing SK1295 Rev A, dated 22 October 2013. 

 

       Note: Outgoing traffic from the site is expected to travel northbound as per the Origin Energy Traffic Management Plan known as the Interim Reedy Creek Traffic Management Plan One Way Route Loop dated 8 July 2013, while such plans are valid.

 

26.  The applicant is to submit an operational works application to Council and gain approval for the required road works and associated drainage in accordance with the CMDG.

 

27.  Roadside guide posts shall be installed to the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Queensland) (MUTCDQ) requirements and specifications with additional guide posts provided at vehicle crossovers and underground drainage works.

 

28.  Internal roads, carparking spaces and driveway areas must be constructed with minimal dust producing materials or sealed.

 

29.  All vehicle movements within the site are to be clear of proposed parking areas, buildings and landscape treatments. Vehicle parking bays must not encroach into swept paths for vehicle movements onsite.

 

30.  Provide a total of 566 car parking spaces on the site in accordance with the approved plans.

 

31.  All vehicular access and related items must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area including Schedule 2: “Standards for Roads, Car Parking, Access and Manoeuvring Areas”, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist, (iv) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (vi) the CMDG and (vii) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

 

 

Rubbish Collection

 

32.  At all times while the use continues, waste containers shall be maintained in a clean and tidy state and shall be emptied and the waste removed from the site on a regular basis.

 

Advertising Signs

 

33.  Any proposed advertising devices shall be subject to a further development application and planning approval unless the advertising devices are in accordance with the exempt or self assessable requirements of the relevant Council planning scheme.

 

34.  Any free-standing advertising signage or structure to be constructed on site shall be designed by an RPEQ (Structural) Engineer and certification provided for both design and construction.

 

Avoiding Nuisance

 

35.  No nuisance is to be caused to adjoining properties and occupiers by the way of smoke, dust, rubbish, contaminant, stormwater discharge or siltation at any time.

 

36.  Any air conditioning, generator, refrigeration, pump, exhaust, fans, or other equipment must be acoustically screened to ensure noise levels do not exceed 5dB above the background noise level.

 

37.  Lighting of the site, including any security lighting, shall be such that the lighting intensity does not exceed 8.0 lux at a distance of 1.5 metres from the site at any property boundary.

 

38.  All lighting shall be directed or shielded so as to ensure that no glare directly affects nearby properties.

 

39.  The approved development is to be kept in an orderly fashion, free of rubbish and clear of weeds and long grasses and not to pose any health and safety risks to the community.

 

Infrastructure Contributions

 

40.  Local road impact charges are to be paid to Maranoa Regional Council in accordance with the following attached Charges Schedule - Local Roads Additional Impacts.

 

41.  All matters contained within this development approval may be covered by infrastructure agreements or deeds of agreement between the relevant parties for each matter. Only parties which are directly affected by the contents of each infrastructure agreement or deed of agreement need to be parties to the agreements.

 

Use

 

42.  All development approval conditions related to the establishment of the approved development must be fulfilled prior to any approved use commencing.

 

43.  The development is approved to be operated for a maximum period of ten (10) years, starting from the day the use commences.

 

44.  Within six months of the use ceasing the site is to be cleared of all temporary structures, waste disposal facilities, internal roads, parking areas and drainage facilities and planted with at least a ground cover of endemic grasses.

 

Amenity

 

45.  The developer is to ensure that the external cladding of the ancillary workers’ accommodation and associated buildings are not damaged and the age of any building is no older than five (5) years.

 

No Cost to Council

 

46.  Services and infrastructure required in connection with the establishment of the approved development must be provided at no cost to Council.

 

47.  The developer is responsible for meeting all costs associated with the approved development unless there is specific agreement by other parties, including the Council, to meeting those costs.

 

48.  All rates and charges of any description and all arrears of such rates and charges, together with interest outstanding thereon, on the land, due to Council, shall be paid to the Council prior to any use commencing on site.

 

Charges Schedule - Local Roads Additional Impacts

 

1.    This condition is required because the development will impact on the local roads when vehicles associated with the operation of the accommodation facility use those local roads. The local roads additional impacts charge covers all roads in the Maranoa Regional Council Area where vehicles of the type used in this activity/use are permitted to travel. The number of accommodation units in the accommodation facility are deemed to be a proportional measure of the total traffic to and from the site.

 

2.    A local roads additional impacts charge of $0.50 per accommodation unit per day will be paid to Maranoa Regional Council. This is the local roads additional impacts charge for the 2013-2014 financial year. Until such time as (1) the methodology is amended or (2) the level of use is changed or (3) Council has amended charges as a result of a review requested by the accommodation facility operator, the local roads additional impacts charges amount will be increased or decreased annually by a percentage equivalent to the change in All groups consumer price index for Brisbane published by the Australian Statistician.

3.    The payment of the local roads additional impacts charge must be made by the accommodation facility operator within 14 days of the end of each 3 month period, with the periods starting with the commencement of the use/activity. The accommodation facility operator must calculate the payment and provide details of the calculation. If no payment is made within the set time, the Council may demand payment based on the maximum approved accommodation capacity of the activity/use divided by 4. The maximum approved accommodation capacity of the accommodation facility will be deemed to be the maximum capacity of the accommodation facility listed in the approvals for the site. If the accommodation facility operator does not pay the local roads additional impacts charge for two consecutive periods, the Council can require the holder of the development approval to pay the local roads additional impacts charge to the Council.

 

4.    The holder of the development approval or the accommodation facility operator may ask for the local roads additional impacts charge to be reviewed once in every three year period after the approval for the activity/use was given. The review will take account of the rates and methodology applying to similar operators in the Council Area and the facts and circumstances applying to this approved activity/use.

 

5.    The Council may review and amend the methodology for calculating the local roads additional impacts charge but any changes resulting from amendments to the methodology will not take effect for a minimum of 2 years from the date of adoption by Council unless the accommodation facility operator request earlier changes to the charges.

 

6.    Despite the payment of a local roads additional impacts charge, the Council may stop the accommodation facility operator from using particular roads. The reasons may include Council concerns about the level of damage being caused or may be caused to those particular local roads by the addition to total road use by vehicles associated with the accommodation facility.

 

7.    Council or its representatives is entitled to inspect, copy and audit any records which may help to prove the actual use of the road network by the accommodation facility operator or the approval holder(s) for the purposes of assessing the local roads additional impacts charge. The accommodation facility operator and the approval holder(s) have agreed by the acceptance of this condition that the Council has their agreement and permission to access those records wherever held and that their agreement and permission cannot be revoked.

 

8.    These charges can be included within an infrastructure agreement or deed of agreement with the Council, the accommodation facility operator and any other relevant parties by consent of the parties. The accommodation facility operator, the approval holder and the Council may vary the charges and other factors by mutual consent where circumstances warrant such variations and the community interest is protected.

 

 

Body of Report: Refer to Attachment 1.

Consultation (internal/external):

-    Danielle Pearn, Manager Planning & Building Development (internal)

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

The applicant has appeal rights under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 against any decision of Council.

Policy Implications:

Nil.

Financial Resource Implications:

Nil.

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.3.1(a) Regulate and control development in a consistent and responsible manner that enhances the lifestyle of our community whilst promoting sustainable development.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Body of Report

D14/26377

2View

Applicant's Request for Negotiated Decision Notice

D14/13720

 

Report authorised by:

Danielle Pearn, Manager - Planning & Building Development


Attachment 1

Body of Report

 

Background Information

 

An approval for a Material Change of Use - ‘Undefined Use’ (Non-resident Workforce Accommodation – 360 Units) was approved on 22 January 2014.  On 21 February 2014, the applicant requested amendments to the conditions of approval.

 

The requested amendments focus on two issues identified below, renaming responsible entities within the approval, and the onsite power generation.

 

Renaming the responsible entities

 

The applicant wishes the conditions of approval to state that the developer or landowner is not necessarily responsible for a particular condition, and that instead an ‘operator’ or ‘relevant contractor’ is to be named as responsible for that condition.

 

‘The proposed Accommodation Camp will be constructed and operated by separate contractors, which will be engaged as the project progresses.  As such, we request that a number of conditions be amended to reflect this arrangement given that the ‘developer’ will not be the entity who will be constructing and operating the accommodation facility.’

 

The following conditions are requested to be changed (the changed responsibility is noted against the condition):

 

(i)       Condition 4,     developer to ‘accommodation facility operator’;

(ii)       Condition 7,     developer to ‘responsible contractor’;

(iii)      Condition 8,     developer to ‘responsible contractor’;

(iv)     Condition 16,   developer to ‘responsible contractor’;

(v)      Condition 23,   developer to ‘responsible contractor’;

(vi)     Condition 24,   landowner to ‘responsible contractor’;

(vii)     Condition 26,   applicant to accommodation facility operator or relevant contractor’;

(viii)    Condition 31,   developer to ‘responsible contractor’;

(ix)     Condition 45,   developer to ‘accommodation facility operation or responsible contractor’; and

(x)      Condition 47,   developer to ‘accommodation facility operator or responsible contractor’.

 

While the suggested terms may at times be more accurate than the generic term ‘developer’, it would be difficult for Council to predict who may be the best party in the construction and operation of a development to carry out particular activities, and then to name these within the development permit.  As a general principle such descriptions might limit the actions of a developer unnecessarily.

 

The primary issue however, is that it is necessary for Council to identify a single party to which appeal may be made when activities during the construction or operation of the site contravene the existing approval.  The term ‘developer’ is accepted as the description of this primary contact.  It would probably be better if the existing approval did not use the term ‘applicant’ in Condition 26 and ‘landowner’ in Condition 24.

 

On balance, it is recommended that the request for a change to the description of the responsible entity in the above listed conditions be refused.

 

Onsite power generation

 

The applicant requests that Condition 22 be amended so that electricity supply to the development may be by on site generation, rather than by connection to the electricity supply service.  As such supply is becoming common for camp developments that are established outside Council jurisdiction, and as the site is relatively remote, it is considered reasonable to allow onsite power generation.  Any noise created by electricity generators is managed by Condition 36, which requires onsite machinery to not exceed a 5db noise level above the background noise level.

 

It is recommended that Condition 22 be changed to ‘The development is to be connected to a camp generator room or an alternative electricity supply service’, as has been requested by the applicant.

Figure 1: Subject Site (Source: SARA mapping online)

 

Figure 1 shows the subject lot (Lot 22 on SP248280) and the approximate location of the Accommodation Camp within the site.

 

 


Attachment 2

Applicant's Request for Negotiated Decision Notice

 




Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 13.4

File Number: D14/26574

 

Subject Heading:                     Submission of Flood Mitigation Projects under Queensland Government's Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                         

Location:                                           

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Susan (Sue) Sands, (Acting) Coordinator - Local Development & Council Events

 

Executive Summary: 

Council has the opportunity to apply for funding for Stage 2 projects of the Roma Flood Levee under the Queensland Government’s Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding program.

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation: 

That Council:

1.   Apply for funding under the Queensland Government’s Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding program for Stage 2 projects of the Roma Flood Levee, and potential project for Mitchell and Amby Flood Mitigation.

2.   Authorise the Mayor and the CEO to sign the certification form for the application on behalf of the Maranoa Regional Council.

3.   Give consideration to providing a contribution of funds to approved projects if required under the 2014/15 budget.

 

Body of Report:

The Queensland Government’s Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding program is now open, and is administered by the Department of Local Government, Community Recovery and Resilience. 

 

This is a streamlined process to deliver disaster mitigation and resilience funding to help protect communities from the impact of future flooding and other natural disasters.

Council can now apply for the 2014-15 joint application package for access to all disaster mitigation and resilience funding programs administered by the Queensland Government.  Submissions are due on 12 May, with announcements being made from June 2014.


The joint application package incorporates the following programs:
Local Government Floods Response Subsidy - $12.8 million available in 2014-15 for flood mitigation projects.
Royalties for the Regions - $10 million available in 2014-15 for flood mitigation projects.
Natural Disaster Resilience Program - $24 million available for flood mitigation and all hazards projects.

(Council submits an application and the State allocates funds from one or more of the above programs).

 

This is an opportunity for Council to apply for funding for projects incorporated in Stage 2 of the Roma Flood Levee.

 

The following options have been proposed to continue with Stage 2:

1.   Fund the Western levee and the first section of the Eastern Diversion Channel using $4.8M from the $7M National Insurance Affordability Initiative (NIAI). This assumes $2.2M of the NIAI funding is used for the Stage 1 levee and $4.8M would be available for Stage 2 measures.  (see Table 1 below)

2.   Apply for up to $7.727M from the Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding (DMRF) to fund the Eastern levee and the Extended Eastern Diversion Channel.  (see Table 2 below – note the $2.4M of property issues including house raising are ineligible expenditure under the funding guidelines)

 


Activity

Project Prelim ($K)

Western Levee ($K)

Eastern Diversion Channel ($K)

Detailed design

200

Preliminaries construction

400

Earthworks construction

0

95

1434

Road/erosion reconstruction

0

0

120

Warrego Highway RCBC

0

0

0

Railway RCBC

0

0

0

Contingency construction

0

30

730

Property issues

0

500

600

Latent conditions

0

500

50

Services relocation

0

50

50

Total Cost

600

1175

2984

Cumulative Cost

600

1775

4759

Source of Funds NIAI

4800

The remaining works in Stage 2 Combination 7 are: Extended Eastern Diversion Channel, and Eastern Levee. Combination 7 and House Raise DMRF Options 1, 2 and 3 are shown in the following table.

Activity

Project

Prelim

($K)

E/Eastern

Diversion

Channel ($K)

House

Raise ($K)

Eastern

Levee ($K)

Detailed design

385

Preliminaries construction

546

Earthworks construction

0

1555

0

441

Road/erosion reconstruction

0

70

0

280

Warrego Highway RCBC

0

1710

0

0

Railway RCBC

0

990

0

0

Contingency construction

0

1330

0

220

Property issues

0

300

2000

100

Latent conditions

0

50

0

50

Services relocation

0

50

0

50

Total Cost

931

6055

2000

1141

Cumulative Cost

931

6986

8986

10127

Source of Funds DMRF

931

6986

8986

10127

DMRF Option 1

6986

DMRF Option 2

8986

DMRF Option 3

10127

 

It is recommended at this stage that Council provides approval to apply for funding for Stage 2 projects of the Roma Flood Levee under the Queensland Government’s Disaster Mitigation and Resilience Funding program.  Further details on final costings and project details will be brought back to Council as the application process progresses, and further consultation is undertaken with the Department of Local Government, Community Recovery and Resilience. 

 

There is also opportunity to apply for funding for projects relating to the Mitchell and Amby Flood Mitigation project.  A proposal is currently being compiled by Jo Tinnion from BMT WBM Pty Ltd – while details are not available at the time of writing, it is anticipated a summary will be available for the Council meeting on 23 April.

Consultation (internal/external):

Ross Drabble, Project Manager, Roma Flood Levee Project

Cameron Castles, Director – Infrastructure Services

Cindy Irwin, Specialist - Infrastructure Program Funding, Infrastructure Services Support

Damon Meadows, Senior Advisor, Southern Region, Department of Local Government, Community Recovery and Resilience

Joanne Murrell, Senior Advisor, Southern Region, Department of Local Government, Community Recovery and Resilience

 

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

Failure to apply for funding increases the burden for Council and ratepayers.

Policy Implications:

Nil

Financial Resource Implications:

It may be beneficial for Council to consider making a contribution towards the project as part of the 2014/15 budget.

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.4.12(a) To distribute allocated Council funds to community organisations in a fair, equitable and efficient manner to address identified community need.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Disaster Mitigation Funding Options prepared by Ross Drabble April 2014

D14/26657

 

Report authorised by:

Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development


Attachment 1

Disaster Mitigation Funding Options prepared by Ross Drabble April 2014

 




Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 13.5

File Number: D14/26718

 

Subject Heading:                     Material Change of Use to establish Accommodation Units (Two Units) (File: 2013/18803)

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                          Six Mile Building and Construction

Location:                                            13 Major Street, Roma QLD 4455 (Lot 2 on RP74877)

Author & Officer’s Title:                 David Fermer, Coordinator - Planning

 

Executive Summary:

 

The applicant seeks approval for a Material Change of Use to establish Accommodation Units (2 Units) on land at 13 Major Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 2 on RP74877. 

 

The application is subject to Impact Assessment against the relevant provisions of Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006.  No submissions were received during the public notification period (21 February 2014 to 21 March 2014).

 

The proposed development is generally consistent with the provisions of the relevant planning scheme, the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006 including the Desired Environmental Outcomes and the Urban Area Code.

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation: 

 

That Council approve the application for a Material Change of Use to establish Accommodation Units (2 Units) on land at 13 Major Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 2 on RP74877, subject to the following conditions:

 

Preamble

i    Refer to http://www.cmdg.com.au/ for the Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines (CMDG).

ii   The relevant planning scheme for this development is the Roma Town Council Planning Scheme 2006.  All references to the ‘Planning Scheme’ and ‘Planning Scheme Schedules’ within these conditions refer to the above Planning Scheme.

iii  Prior to the commencement of use, the applicant shall contact Council to arrange a development compliance inspection.

Use

1.   The approved development is a Material Change of Use to establish Accommodation Units (2 Units) as shown on the approved plans.

2.   All conditions relating to the establishment of the approved development must be fulfilled prior to any approved use commencing, unless otherwise noted in these conditions.

Approved Plans and Documents

3.   Maintain the approved development - Material Change of Use - Accommodation Units (2 units) generally in accordance with the following approved plans, subject to and modified by any conditions of this approval:

Drawing SD-01 Revision DA1

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Site Locality Plan

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-02 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Site Plan (amended by Council in red)

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-03 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Site Setout Plan

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-04 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Indicative Landscaping Plan

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 29/11/13

Drawing SD-05 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Vehicle Swept Path

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-10 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Units 1 & 2 Floor Plan

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-11 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Units 1 & 2 Elevations

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

 

 

Drawing SD-12 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Units 1 & 2 Elevations

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-20 Revision DA1      

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Units 1 & 2 3-D Views

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 28/11/13

Drawing SD-21 Revision P1         

Prop. Multi Unit Dwellings Structural Drawings Site 3-D View

prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting          dated 23/10/13

Document D5          

Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines – Stormwater Drainage Design Guidelines            dated 03/2012

Document D7          

Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines – Erosion Control and Stormwater Management Design Guideline    dated 03/2012

Document D11        

Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines – Water Reticulation Design Guidelines  dated 10/2007

Document D12        

Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines – Sewerage Reticulation Design Guideline            dated 10/2007

4.   All works must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist (iv) the Capricorn Municipal Development Guidelines, (v) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

Landscaping and Fencing

5.   Landscaping is to be provided as shown on approved drawing Indicative Landscaping Plan SD-04 Rev DA1 prepared by Bill Robinson Drafting Services.  Vegetation is to also include Australian native groundcovers in all beds, in addition to the plants shown on the plan.

6.   Landscaping is to be irrigated during an establishment period of two years, and ground covers should fully cover vegetated areas within one year of planting.

7.   Site landscaping must be fully planted prior to occupation of the dwelling units.

8.   Site landscaping must not interfere with electrical infrastructure nor restrict maintenance access to any onsite infrastructure, public utility or easement.

9.   Screen fencing to a height of 1.8 metres is to be established along the side and rear boundaries of the site, and between the units (and front garden area) sufficient to provide private open space to each unit.

Amenity

10. At all times while the use continues, waste containers shall be maintained in a clean and tidy state and shall be emptied and the waste removed from the site on a regular basis.

11. All waste containers shall be shielded from the view of travelling public and neighbours.

12. Provide a letterbox for each unit at the front site boundary.

Avoiding Nuisance

13. Lighting of the site, including any security lighting, shall be such that the lighting intensity does not exceed 8.0 lux at a distance of 1.5 metres from the site at any property boundary.

14. Any air conditioning, generator, refrigeration, pump, exhaust, fans, processing or other equipment must be acoustically screened to ensure noise levels do not exceed 5dB  above the background noise level.

Erosion Control

15. All construction works on site are to be undertaken in accordance with the Institute of Engineers (Australia) (IEAUST) Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Engineering Guidelines for Queensland Construction sites and the CMDG Design Guidelines – D7.

16. Measures shall be applied to prevent site vehicles tracking sediment and other pollutants onto adjoining roads during the course of the construction period and to prevent dust nuisance during construction.

17. Should it be necessary for the road and/or drainage system to be reinstated or cleaned up due to erosion and/or sedimentation from the site, then such works shall be undertaken immediately, and at no cost to Council.

Provision of Services

18. All civil and related work shall be designed and supervised by RPEQ Registered Professional Engineers of Queensland (RPEQ) who are competent in the construction of the works.

19. Any conflicts associated with proposed and existing services shall be forwarded by the developer to the appropriate controlling authority for approval for any proposed changes.

20. The development is to be connected to Council’s reticulated sewerage disposal system in accordance with the Water Services Association of Australia (WSAA) publication WSA02-2002 Sewerage Code of Australia (version 2.3) and the CMDG Design Guideline - D12 ‘Sewerage Reticulation’, at no cost to Council.

21. Building piers or other building supports are to be located a minimum of 1.5m from the centre line of the sewer main traversing the rear and side of the lot. Any relaxation of this requirement will only be accepted with the written agreement of Council. Any piers agreed by Council to be within the 1.5m zone of influence of the sewer main will require the piers to be placed below the invert level of the sewer main.

22. The development is to be connected to Council’s reticulated water supply system in accordance with the Water Services Association of Australia (WSAA) publication WSA03-2002 Water Reticulation Code of Australia (version 2.3) and the CMDG Design Guideline – D11 ‘Water Reticulation’, at no cost to Council.

23. The existing water meter and an existing fire hydrant are shown within the proposed driveway entrance.  This infrastructure is to be relocated at the developer’s expense to a suitable location away from the concrete driveway. Contact Council on 1300007662 to complete these works.

24. The development must be connected to an electricity reticulation service in accordance with the relevant service provider’s requirements and specifications along with relevant building standards, requirements and specifications (as relevant).

25. If the development is connected to a telecommunications service, then such works shall be undertaken in accordance with the relevant service provider’s requirements and specifications along with relevant building standards requirements and specifications (as relevant).

26. All services installation, including sewer, water, gas, electricity and telecommunications connections to the respective networks, must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist  (iv) the CMDG where it applies (v) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work and (vi) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

Stormwater and Drainage

27. Stormwater run-off from roof and impervious surface areas is to be collected internally and piped generally in accordance with the CMDG to the existing kerb in Major Street adjacent to the site in accordance with a lawful point of discharge.

28. Stormwater must not be allowed to pond on the property being developed during the development process and after the development has been completed.

29. Adjoining properties and roads are to be protected from ponding or nuisance from stormwater as a result of the works.  Ensure the stormwater runoff from the site does not adversely impact on flooding or drainage of properties that are upstream, downstream or adjacent to the site.

30. There must be no increases in any silt loads or contaminants in any overland flow from the property being developed during the development process and after the development has been completed.

Flood Mitigation

31. The defined flood event level (post Stage One levee) at the site is 298.20 metres AHD.  Ground level at the site is 298.00 metres AHD.  Finished Floor Level is required to be 300mm above the flood level, requiring all habitable buildings to be a minimum of 500mm above ground level.

32. An ‘anti ponding’ pad (150mm peak) is required under each habitable building, with the peak approximately at the centre of the footprint of each building.

33. The underfloor area of the dwelling units must not impede the free flow of flood waters.

Access, Car parking and Manoeuvring

34. The landowner shall be responsible for construction and maintenance of vehicle crossovers from the road carriageway to the property boundary and for obtaining any approvals that may be required and for complying with the applicable designs and standards.

35. A 5.5m wide vehicle crossover from Major Street is to be constructed of concrete in accordance with drawing CMDG-R-041 Rev B - Residential Driveway Slab and Tracks, dated 07/2011.

36. Vehicle crossovers must be located a minimum distance of one metre from any street signage, power poles, street lights, manholes, stormwater gully pits or other Council assets.

37. Provide a total of five (5) car parking spaces on the site in accordance with the approved plans.  One (1) space is to be available for visitors.

38. Parking bay configurations (width and lengths) are to be in accordance with AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Parking Facilities Part 1: Off-Street Car Parking.

39. Vehicles entering and exiting the development site must be able to enter and leave in forward direction.  Reversing out of development site is not permitted.  Vehicle manoeuvres in this regard are to be totally contained within the development site boundaries.

40. Vehicle access and manoeuvring areas are to comply with AS/NZS 2890.1:2004 Parking facilities Part 1: Off-street car parking.

41. All car parking spaces and driveway areas are to be sealed with an approved impervious surface.  Surfacing shall consist of either; patterned, reinforced concrete, concrete pavers, segmental clay pavers, asphaltic hotmix or two coat (primerseal/seal) bitumen seal.

42. All landscaping, streetscaping, vehicular access, parking, roads, bikeways, footpaths, street lighting, parks, street plantings, street furniture and related items must comply with (i) the development approval conditions, (ii) any relevant provisions in the planning scheme for the area, (iii) Council’s standard designs for such work where such designs exist  (iv) Schedule 2: “Standards for Roads, Car Parking, Access and Manoeuvring Areas” (v) any relevant Australian Standard that applies to that type of work, (vi) the CMDG and (vii) any alternative specifications that Council has agreed to in writing and which the developer must ensure do not conflict with any requirements imposed by any applicable laws and standards.

Roadwork

43. All works on or near roadways shall be adequately signed in accordance with the “Manual for Uniform Traffic Control Devices – Part 3, Works on Roads”.

Site works

44. During the course of constructing the works, the developer shall ensure that all works are carried out by appropriately qualified persons and the developer and the persons carrying out and supervising the work shall be responsible for all aspects of the works, including public and worker safety, and shall ensure adequate barricades, signage and other warning devices are in place at all times.

45. Whilst the approved works are in progress, no nuisance is to be caused to adjoining properties and occupiers by the way of noise, smoke, dust, rubbish, contaminant, stormwater discharge or siltation at any time, including non-working hours.

46. Whilst the approved works are in progress, waste containers must remain on site and be maintained in a clean and tidy state and shall be emptied and the waste removed from the site on a regular basis.

47. Unless otherwise approved in writing by the Council, approved hours of construction are restricted to Monday – Saturday 6.00 am to 6.00 pm – noise permitted.  Work or business which causes audible noise must not be conducted from or on the subject land outside the above times or on Sundays or Public Holidays.

Environmental Management

48. The Environmental Protection Act 1994 states that a person must not carry out any activity that causes, or is likely to cause, environmental harm unless the person takes all reasonable and practicable measures to prevent or minimise the harm.  Environmental harm includes environmental nuisance.  In this regard, persons and entities involved in the operation of the approved development are to adhere no their ‘general environmental duty’ to minimise the risk of causing environmental harm to adjoining premises.

Fees and Infrastructure Charges

49. An infrastructure contribution, in accordance with Maranoa Regional Council’s adopted Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme 2006, of $21,000.00 is payable to the Council.  The stated charge is to be paid prior to commencement of construction.

All infrastructure charges including those associated with Council's Water, Sewerage, Stormwater, Transport and Parks networks are now levied under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, following its amendment by the Sustainable Planning (Housing Affordability and Infrastructure Charges Reform) Amendment Act 2011.  As required under Section 648F of the Sustainable Planning Act, a separate Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice is attached.

Complete and Maintain

50. Complete and maintain the approved development as follows: (i) generally in accordance with development approval documents and (ii) strictly in accordance with those parts of the approved development which have been specified in detail by the Council or Referral Agency unless the Council or Referral Agency agrees in writing that those parts will be adequately complied with by amended specifications.

51. Complete and maintain all operational, building and plumbing and drainage work associated with this development approval, including work required by any of the development approval conditions.

            Repair Damaged Infrastructure

52. The developer is responsible for locating and protecting any Council and public utility services, infrastructure and assets that may be impacted on during construction of the development.  Any damage to existing infrastructure (kerb, road pavement, existing underground assets, etc) that is attributable to the progress of works on the site or vehicles associated with the development of the site shall be immediately rectified in accordance with the asset owners’ requirements and specifications and to the satisfaction of the asset owners’ representative(s), and at no cost to the asset owner.

            No cost to council

53. Services and infrastructure required in connection with the establishment of the approved development must be provided at no cost to Council.

54. The developer is responsible for meeting all costs associated with the approved development unless there is specific agreement by other parties, including the Council, to meeting those costs.

55. All rates and charges of any description and all arrears of such rates and charges, together with interest outstanding thereon, on the land, due to Council, shall be paid to the Council prior to occupation of the units.

            Latest versions

56. Where another condition refers to a specific published standard, manual or guideline, including specifications, drawings, provisions and criteria within those documents, that condition shall be deemed as referring to the latest versions of those publications that are publicly available at the time the first operational works or compliance approval is lodged with the assessment manager or approval agency for those types of works to be performed or approved, unless a regulation or law requires otherwise.

            Application Documentation

57. It is the developer’s responsibility to ensure that all entities associated with this Development Approval have a legible copy of the Decision Notice and the Approved Plans and Approved Documents bearing ‘Council Approval’

 

 

Body of Report:

Refer to Attachment 1

Consultation (internal/external):

Danielle Pearn Planning Manager (internal)

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

The applicant has appeal rights under the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 against any decision of Council.

Policy Implications:

The application generally accords with the policy position of the Roma Town Planning Scheme 2006.

Financial Resource Implications:

Any conditions imposed will be at the cost of the developer.

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.3.1(a) Regulate and control development in a consistent and responsible manner that enhances the lifestyle of our community whilst promoting sustainable development.

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Report

D14/26774

2View

Plans of development

D13/63678

3View

Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice

D14/26561

 

Report authorised by:

Danielle Pearn, Manager - Planning & Building Development


Attachment 1

Report

 

1.0 Background Information

 

Proposal

 

The applicant has proposed the establishment of two accommodation units on vacant land at 13 Major Street Roma.  The subject site is within the Residential  Zone of the Roma Town Planning Scheme. There are no previous approvals at the site, although the site was previously occupied by a single dwelling.

 

The proposed use is considered to be appropriately defined as ‘Accommodation Units’ within the Scheme. The definition for ‘Accommodation Units’ is as follows;

 

"Accommodation Units" - means any premises comprising an integrated development of dwelling units and/or rooming units. The term includes multiple dwelling units, retirement villages and apartment houses.

 

Total Gross Floor Area of both units is 310.2m².  Site coverage, including the carport, is 36.6%, which is below the 40% maximum specified in the code.  Adequate private open space is provisioned and fully fenced with a solid 1.8 metre fence.

 

Four parking bays are provided under separate carports, plus one visitor bay within the front boundary setback. Parking for Unit 2 is provided in tandem, which is considered acceptable for a private residence.

 

Assessment of the Site

 

The development site is located within the Residential Zone and surrounded by existing residential land uses including single detached dwellings and multiple dwelling units.  The site comprises an area of 935m2.

 

Bungil Creek is less than 250 metres away to the north, and the site is subject to minor flooding (200mm) during the defined flood event (post Levee 1 levels). The buildings are above ground, on stumps and well above this flood level, however a condition for the floor to be above the defined flood event flood level (to 300mm) has been included.

 

A preliminary landscaping plan has been included in the application which includes appropriate species and adequate landscaped area. Conditions requiring irrigation during establishment and ground cover planting have also been included.

 

Design and Use of the Units

 

Each unit is designed with three bedrooms and three bathrooms.  This is a characteristic pattern of house-style buildings that are designed for the accommodation of non-resident workers.  The implications of this are an increased demand for parking on site, and that the occupants may be in the units on a short term basis. The Planning Scheme does not contain definitions that can be easily applied to non-resident workforce accommodation patterns, or even short term accommodation (apart from Hotel and Motel), so the defined use ‘Accommodation Units’ is considered the most appropriate definition.

 

It is proposed to set Unit 2 (the front unit) 6.5 metres back from the front boundary.  It is considered that this will not compromise the character or amenity of the area. The applicant has requested this reduced setback as the available building envelope is reduced by the sewer mains crossing the site to the rear, which prevents Unit 1 being any closer than 8.1 metres from the rear boundary.

 

Onsite Sewer

 

The site contains a sewer main traversing the rear and the side of the lot. The approval conditions the development to provide a minimum of 1.5 metres clearance between the sewer and any building foundation.

 

Public Notification and Referrals

 

As the development is impact assessable, public notification is required in accordance with Section 297 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.  The application was publically notified between 25 February 2014 and 24 March 2014. No submissions were received during this period. No referrals to other agencies are required.

 

Infrastructure Charges

 

Accommodation Units fall within the State Planning and Regulatory Provision charge category ‘Multiple Dwelling’ under the MRC Adopted Infrastructure Charges Resolution 2012. Infrastructure Charges will be charged at the rate of $21,000 per unit (for a three or more bedroom dwelling). The development will be credited with a discount of $21,000 for the previous (now demolished) dwelling.

 

Further Approvals

 

Subsequent approvals for Building Works and Plumbing and Drainage Works will be required. 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure 1 - Locality and Zoning Plan

 

 

IMG_6360.JPG

 

Figure 2 – View of site from Major Street

 

 

2.0      Assessment Against the Planning Scheme

 

Desired Environmental Outcomes

 

The Desired Environmental Outcomes (DEOs) are based on ecological sustainability established by Integrated Planning Act 1997, and are the basis for the measures of the planning scheme. Compliance with the DEOs is examined below:

 

(a)   Environment

 

(i)     The areas of high scenic amenity, remnant vegetation, wetlands, fauna habitats and wildlife corridors and regionally significant open space in the town are protected.

 

The site is situated within a developed urban area and its development will not result in any adverse impact on environmentally significant areas. The site contains no significant vegetation, so the proposed planting of trees as part of the development will ultimately contribute to the locality.  

 

(ii)     Places, areas or sites identified as being susceptible to land degradation, including contamination, erosion, salinity and landslip, are protected and further degradation is minimised.

 

The subject site is flat, within an urban area and not identified as being susceptible to land degradation. The site is mapped as within the defined flood event, but the landscaping and driveway treatments proposed will prevent contamination or erosion from the site during a flood event.

 

(iii)    Ecological sustainability is achieved by maintaining and improving biodiversity, water and air quality.

 

The development involves the intensification of a residential use within a developed urban area.  The proposal will not compromise biodiversity, water or air quality.

 

(iv)    Places of historical and indigenous cultural heritage and social significance are protected, maintained and enhanced.

 

The subject site is not identified as being in proximity to, or a place of, historical, cultural or social significance. 

 

(b)    Economic

 

(i)     Business and commercial development shall be located within the Commercial Zone to promote and strengthen the existing central Business District.

 

(ii)     The Central Business District (CBD) or inner core of the Commercial Zone is intended to contain the more intensive commercial uses.  Entertainment facilities and tourist accommodation will also be favoured within and adjacent to the CBD to provide a central focus of activity and promote vitality after office hours.

 

The proposal is for residential development in a residential area and will not compromise the location of business and commercial development with the Commercial Zone and CBD, and will increase population densities immediately surrounding the Commercial Zone.

 

(iii)    Beautification and improved parking facilities will enhance the efficiency, attractions and vitality of the Town CBD.

 

Car parking spaces will be provided to cater for the intensification of the existing land use, and landscaping is proposed as part of the application. This appropriately intensified residential use close to the CBD, will enhance the vitality of the CBD.

 

(iv)    Tourism will be promoted with significant economic and social benefits to the town as a regional centre with close association with the oil and gas industry and the proximity of the Carnarvon National Park.

 

The proposal is for residential development within the Residential Zone and will not adversely impact on tourism within the region. 

 

(v)     Industry, business and employment opportunities are improved and appropriately located to service the community and region, and encourage economic activity within the local area.

 

The development will support industry, business and employment opportunities in the local area by increasing the range of accommodation available within Roma.

 

(c)    Community Well-Being & Lifestyle

 

(i)     Convenient access to roads and services is achieved through well located land uses and the efficient use and timely provision of infrastructure such as water, sewerage and roads walkways and cycling facilities.

 

The development site is located within an established residential area that provides convenient and efficient access to infrastructure and services.  

 

(ii)   Infrastructure networks such as road and rail, water cycle and electricity infrastructure are protected from encroachment by sensitive land uses which may adversely affect or limit the normal operation of that infrastructure.

 

The development site is not located in proximity to major water cycle, rail or electricity infrastructure.  The development is appropriately located within a residential area and will not adversely impact on the normal operation of the local road network.

 

(iii)   Rural residential and urban residential development occurs in distinct localities that provide a sense of community, amenity, services, and a safe, affordable living environment, whilst maintaining the rural amenity of the Town Area.

 

The development site is located within an established residential area, with infrastructure and services available to provide a suitable living environment for residents of the dwelling units. The proposed units are comparable to the neighbouring residential dwelling and integrate with the built form of the town. The development will have minimal impact on the streetscape as the development will incorporate landscaping and privacy fencing along the property boundaries, and is single storey and of the same form as the surrounding dwellings.

 

(iv)  The adverse effects from natural and other hazards, including bushfires are minimised.

 

The site is not identified as being susceptible to bushfire, flooding or other hazards. 

 

(v)    The range of housing types, services and facilities meets the needs of the community and other uses.

 

The proposed development will increase the range of housing types available to the community, by offering additional smaller dwelling units.

 

(vi)    Community well being is not compromised by inappropriate development that impacts upon noise levels, traffic volume, lighting levels, local amenity.

 

The development is consistent with the existing land uses in the locality and will not have an adverse impact on noise levels, traffic volume, lighting levels or the local amenity.

 

Overall Outcomes for Urban Area Code

 

The Urban Area Code identifies overall outcomes, providing direction about relevant assessment issues.  The overall outcomes are examined below:

 

(a)     Roma is a focus for a range of business, industrial, tourist, community and recreational activity in the local government area;

 

The proposed development will provide residential accommodation which will compliment a range of other established uses in the centre of Roma.

 

(b)     Business and commercial development is located primarily in the CBD to provide central and accessible services to the local government area;

 

The development does not involve business or commercial activities, and increases the need for services in the Roma CBD.

 

(c)     The residential and heritage character and amenity of the Urban Area is retained;

 

The proposed units are single storey and consistent with the scale and character of residential development in the area.  Landscaping and screen fencing will be established along site boundaries to enhance the visual amenity of the site and ensure privacy for occupants and adjoining residences. 

 

 (d)    Safe and convenient access for pedestrians and cyclists is maintained and enhanced;

 

The development will not adversely impact on the safety and convenience of cyclist or pedestrian movements near the site.   Conditions of approval require the provision of vehicle manoeuvring areas within the site, to ensure vehicles can exit in a forward direction for improved visibility and safety. 

 

(e)    Residential (including Rural Residential) development occurs where there is no adverse impact on Good Quality Agricultural Land;

 

The development site is located within the Roma Town area and is not situated in proximity to Good Quality Agricultural Land.

 

(f)     Residential development is buffered from the existing and proposed road and rail corridors to minimise any detrimental impact;

 

The development is not located near a rail corridor.  Access to the site is obtained via a local access street which is designed to cater for residential land uses. 

 

(g)     Residential development accommodates a range of housing types and allotment sizes, and provides a safe and pleasant living environment, with adequate access to community services and is located in the residential preferred areas shown on the Urban Area Maps in the appendices;

 

The development site is located in an established residential area with access to community services.  The development will increase housing diversity in Roma Town, by providing additional higher density housing.

 

(h)     The expansion of residential development occurs in areas where it is most cost effective to supply physical infrastructure, such as water, sewerage, roads and electricity;

 

The proposed development will increase the efficient use of existing urban infrastructure by adding an additional dwelling to the Priority Infrastructure Area.

 

(i)     Efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure, such as schools, neighbourhood shopping, community services, public transport services, and parks are provided in residential areas;

 

The development site is appropriately located in an established residential area and encourages efficient and equitable access to social infrastructure.

 

(j)      Industrial development is located in the Industrial Zone of the town (see maps in appendices);

 

(k)     Impacts of industrial uses are required to be within acceptable limits and uses are undertaken in sustainable manner consistent with the amenity and character of the area concerned;

 

The proposal does not involve industrial development.

 

(l)      Small scale business, community and emergency services are provided for the needs of the local community;

 

The proposed development does not involve any business, community or emergency services.

 

(m)    All Areas other than the Commercial Zone are protected from shopping centre and other forms of commercial development.

 

The proposal is for a residential use in the Residential Zone and does not involve commercial development. 

 

Performance Criteria of the Urban Area Code

 

The relevant Performance Criteria of the Code is examined below to provide more detailed consideration of relevant issues -

 

 Performance Criteria

Assessment Responses

 A.    For all of the Town Area

 Infrastructure

PC 1 Electricity

Premises are provided with a supply of electricity adequate for the activity.

 

The proposed development is located in an established urban area with access to electrical infrastructure.

PC 2 Water supply

Premises are provided with an adequate volume and supply of water for the activity.

 

The proposed development is located in an established urban area with reticulated water supply available.

PC 3 Effluent disposal

To ensure that public health and environmental values are preserved, all premises provide for the treatment and disposal of effluent and other waste water.

 

The proposed development is located in an established urban area with reticulated sewerage available.

 

 

PC 4 Stormwater/Inter-allotment Drainage

Stormwater is collected and discharged so as to:

(a)  protect the stability of buildings or the use adjacent land;

(b)  prevent the waterlogging of  nearby land; and

(c)  protect and maintain environmental values.

 

Conditions of approval will require stormwater from the development site to be collected and discharged to the street to ensure no increase in post-development flows to adjoining properties and no adverse environmental impacts.

PC 5 Vehicle Access

Vehicle access is provided to a standard appropriate for the use.

 

The development will gain access to Major Street via a 6m two-way concrete crossover.  This will be imposed as a condition of approval.

 

The site access is currently obstructed by a fire hydrant and water meter. This will be conditioned to be relocated further along the site.

 

PC 6 Density

The density of residential activities does not impact adversely on the residential amenity of the town.

 

The density of the development is appropriate for the location and will contribute to the residential amenity of the town.

PC 7 Parking and manoeuvring

Vehicle parking and service vehicle provision is adequate for the use whilst ensuring both safe and functional operation for motorists and pedestrians.

                         

The development incorporates provision for five onsite car parking spaces which is compliant with the minimum requirement of 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit. 

 

The proposed car parking arrangement includes the provision of a duel carport for unit 1 and a single carport with a tandem undercover park for unit two.  A single visitor parking space is provided at the front of the site.

 

PC 8 Roads

All weather road access is provided between the premises and the existing road network.

 

The development proposal does not require the creation or upgrade of new roads.  Conditions of approval will require the construction of a sealed vehicle crossover to provide all weather access from the site to the roadway.

PC 9 State Controlled Roads

State Controlled Roads are maintained and enhanced as a link between major centres.        

The development site is located on a local access street which is intended to cater for residential land uses.  The development site is not located in proximity to State-controlled roads and will not impact on their function as a link between major centres.    

PC 10 Development Adjacent to State Controlled Roads

Development adjacent to State Controlled Roads is located to ensure safe and efficient use of the highway and maintain the integrity of the highway as a commuter link.

 

Not Applicable - The development site is not located adjacent to a State controlled road.

 

 

PC 11 Noise Sensitive Development

Noise sensitive developments (residential, educational and community) must ensure that road traffic noise levels are appropriately managed to achieve acceptable levels of amenity.

 

The proposed development is located on a local residential access street and is surrounded by residential land uses.  The proposal will not be adversely impacted by noise generated from road traffic.

PC 12 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome

Development

(a)     does not adversely affect the operation of the aerodrome;

(b)     is designed and located to achieve a suitable standard of amenity for the proposed activity; and

(c)     does not restrict the future operational demands of the aerodrome.

 

Not Applicable - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome.

PC 13 Development in the Vicinity of Aerodrome

The development of premises does not cause an obstruction or other potential hazard to aircraft movement associated with the aerodrome by way of:

(a)     the physical intrusion of buildings or other structures into the Obstacle Limitation Surface;

(b)     attracting birds or bats to the area which could cause or contribute to bird strike hazard;

(c)     providing very bright lighting or lighting similar to aerodrome lighting which can distract or confuse pilots;

(d)     interfering with navigation or communication facilities;

(e)     emissions that may affect pilot visibility or aircraft operations; or

(f)     transient intrusions into the aerodromes operational space.

 

Not Applicable - The proposed development is not in the vicinity of the aerodrome.

PC 14 Gas and Oil Pipelines

Buildings are located at an appropriate distance from pipelines to ensure community safety and operation of the use is not compromised.

                         

The site is situated in an established residential area and is located an appropriate distance from gas and oil pipelines.

 

PC 15 Refuse Tips and Effluent Treatment Plants

Premises are located at an appropriate distance from refuse tips and effluent treatment plants to ensure community safety and operation of the uses are not compromised.

                         

The site is not located in proximity to refuse tips or effluent treatment plants.

PC 16 Rail Corridors

Development is at an appropriate distance from the rail corridor so as not to prejudice safety, speed or intended role of the existing and proposed rail corridors.

 

The proposed development is not located in proximity to the rail corridor. 

PC 17 Noise Attenuation

Development adjoining the rail corridor is protected from the impact of noise.    

 

Not Applicable – The site does not adjoin a rail corridor.

2. Environment

PC 18 Watercourses

Development ensures the maintenance of riparian areas and water quality including protection from off-site transfer of sediment.

 

Not Applicable – The site is not located in proximity to watercourses.

PC 19 Protected Areas

Development is undertaken to ensure areas of significant biodiversity and habitat value are protected.

 

Not Applicable – The site is not located in proximity to areas of significant biodiversity or habitat value.

 

PC 20 Flooding

Premises are designed and located so as:

(a) not to be adversely impacted upon by flooding;

(b) to protect life and property; and

(c) not to have an undesirable impact on the extent and magnitude of flooding.

The site is impacted by the defined flood event, at a depth of 200mm.  The units to be constructed with a finished floor level 300mm above this height.

PC 21 Air Emissions

Air emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses.

 

The development is a residential use and is not of a nature to cause environmental harm or nuisance through air emissions.

PC 22 Noise Emissions

Noise emissions from premises do not cause environmental harm or nuisance to adjoining properties or sensitive land uses.

 

The development is a residential land use that is consistent with the intent of the area within which it is proposed.  The development is not anticipated to generate noise levels in excess of what would normally be expected in a residential area.

PC 23 Water Quality

The standard of effluent and/or stormwater runoff from premises ensures the quality of surface water is suitable for:

(a)  the biological integrity of aquatic ecosystems;

(b)  recreational use;

(c)  supply as drinking water after minimal treatment;

(d)  agricultural use; or

industrial use; and

(e)  Minimises nuisance or harm to adjoining land owners

 

The development will incorporate appropriate stormwater disposal for the proposed use.  This will be imposed as a condition of approval.

 

PC 24 Excavation and Filling

Excavation and filling of land ensures:

(a)     that both the amenity and safety of users of the site and adjacent land holdings; and

(b)     soil erosion is kept to a minimum with remedial works.

 

Conditions of approval will require any earthworks to be undertaken in accordance with Schedule 7: Standards for Construction Activity and the CMDG Design Guidelines.

 

PC 25 Construction Activities

Both erosion control and silt collection measures are undertaken so as to ensure protection of environmental values during construction.

 

During construction, soil erosion and sediment will be managed in accordance with Schedule 7: “Standards for Construction Activity”.  This will be imposed as a condition of approval.

PC 26 Bushfire Hazard Area

Development maintains the safety of people and property by avoiding areas of High or Medium Bushfire hazard or mitigating the risk through:

(a) the siting of buildings ensuring setbacks from hazardous vegetation are maximised and elements least susceptible to fire are sited closest to the bushfire hazard; and

(b) the provision of firebreaks to ensure adequate setbacks between Buildings, structures and Hazardous vegetation

 

The development site is located in an urban area and is not identified as a Medium or High Bushfire Hazard Area.

PC 27 Character Buildings

Development adjacent to buildings identified as heritage or character buildings within Schedule 9 incorporates design features, materials and details that blend with the existing character of the adjoining buildings and/or place.

 

Not Applicable – The development is not located near to heritage or character buildings.

PC 28 Cultural Heritage

The significance of known places of indigenous and/or cultural heritage value is retained.

 

The development is not located in proximity to any places of known indigenous or cultural heritage value.

B. For the Residential Zone

a) Residential Development – Dwelling House, Dual occupancy and Accommodation Units

PC 29 Height

The height of residential buildings is compatible with and complementary to the character of the urban environment.

 

The proposed development involves the establishment of two single storey dwelling units on the site.  The maximum building height above ground level will not exceed 4.5 metres, which is consistent with the character of the urban area.

PC 30 Site Coverage and Setbacks

(a) Residential building design and siting maintains the character of the locality in terms of building bulk.

(b) Residential buildings are located to ensure the local amenity and streetscape are protected and enhanced.

 

AS 30.1

The combined footprint of the proposed buildings (including carports) will occupy approximately 370.2m² of the site, equating to 36.6% site coverage, which is below the maximum 40% site coverage for accommodation units.

 

The development is consistent to the local character and amenity in this respect.

 

AS 30.2 – AS 30.4

Not Applicable – The development is not for dual occupancies.

 

AS 30.5 - AS 30.7

The proposed dwelling units are setback 6.5m from the front property boundary. The applicant is seeking a boundary relaxation of 0.5m as there is a sewerage line traversing the property at the rear. It is considered that the reduced setbacks will not compromise the character and amenity of the area.

 

A minimum setback of 3.0 metres will be provided from the proposed buildings to the side boundaries of the site.

 

PC 31 Residential amenity For Dual Occupancies and Accommodation Units:

The location and design of dual occupancies provides for adequate privacy, sunlight, ventilation and open space.

 

The proposed units are adequately setback from site boundaries to ensure adequate sunlight, ventilation and open space is provided for residents.  Screen fencing will be established between the units and along the site boundaries to provide private open space at the rear of the existing and proposed dwelling units.

 

PC 32 Landscaping For Dual Occupancies and Accommodation Units:

Landscaping on the site should be:

(a)  visually pleasing and create an attractive environment;

(b)  located to take account of the direction of the breezes and sun; and

(c)  located to give privacy and buffering from any potential incompatible uses.

(d)  Located to avoid interference with electricity lines and infrastructure.

Landscaping will be established adjacent the site boundaries and in front of the dwelling units.  Site landscaping will contribute to the overall amenity of the development and local streetscape. 

 

 

3.0       Assessment Summary

 

Although the proposed development requires impact assessment, the proposal does not conflict with the intent of the Residential Zone.  The development is consistent with the scale and character of residential development in the Roma Town area and will contribute to the range of housing available within the community.

 

 


Attachment 2

Plans of development

 












Attachment 3

Adopted Infrastructure Charges Notice

 

 

 


ADOPTED INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES NOTICE

 

Issued by Maranoa Regional Council in accordance with:

 

1.   Section 648F of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009

2.   State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) 2012

3.   Maranoa Regional Council Resolution to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges), 2012 – effective 26 September 2012

4.   Development Approval 2013/18803 for a Material Change of Use for Accommodation Units (Two Units) on land at 13 Major Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 2 on RP74877.

 

(a)        The amount of the charge:

 

$21,000.00 is payable as infrastructure charges.

 

This is based on an adopted charge of $21,000.00 per 3+ bedroom dwelling unit.

 

A discount of $21,000 is applicable based on the monetary equivalent of the existing lawful use of the premises.

 

(b)       The land to which the charge applies:

 

This charge is levied in respect of a Development Approval for a Material Change of Use for Accommodation Units (Two Units) on land at 13 Major Street, Roma QLD 4455, described as Lot 2 on RP74877.

 

(c)        The person to whom the charge must be paid:

 

Chief Executive Officer,

Maranoa Regional Council

 

(d)       When the charge is payable:

 

Prior to commencing construction of the approved development.

 

(e)       If the local government has, under its adopted infrastructure charges resolution, provided for the charge to increase, an additional amount, worked out in compliance with section 648D(10)(b) of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, is payable on the day the charge is paid:

 

The Maranoa Regional Council Resolution to adopt Infrastructure Charges for the Roma Planning Scheme under the State planning regulatory provision (adopted charges) 2102 – effective 26 September 2012, provides for increases in charges to be made in accordance Section 7 of that Resolution. The increases are related to the Consumer Price Index (all Groups) for Brisbane.


ADVICE ABOUT THIS ADOPTED INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES NOTICE (AICN)

 

When does an AICN lapse?

 

An AICN lapses if the corresponding development approval or compliance permit stops having effect.

 

Negotiated AICN

 

A person who receives an AICN may make a written representation (e.g. a letter, facsimile or email) about the AICN to the entity that gave the notice (i.e. local government or a water distributor retailer) (Chapter 8, Part 4 of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 (SPA)). If the entity agrees with any of the representations, the entity will issue a negotiated AICN which replaces the original notice.

 

SPA also provides for representations to be made about decision notices under Chapter 6, Part 8. Where a negotiated decision notice affects the amount of an adopted infrastructure charge, the local government may issue a new AICN to replace the original notice (section 364 of the SPA).

 

A representation about an AICN or a decision notice must be started during the period within which the person may make an appeal about the AICN or the decision notice.

 

Permissible change and an AICN

 

A permissible change, is a minor change to a development approval that would not result in a substantially different development (section 367 of the SPA). An AICN, or negotiated AICN, cannot be issued as part of the process for a permissible change to a development approval. In this regard, a permissible change to a development approval should not result in a change that warrants a new AICN.

 

Making an appeal about an AICN

 

A person, who is given an AICN or negotiated AICN and is dissatisfied, may appeal to the Planning and Environment Court (Court) against the notice, under section 478 of the SPA. An appeal against an AICN or a negotiated AICN can only be about:

 whether a charge in the notice is so unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local government, state infrastructure provider or coordinating agency could have imposed it; or

 an error in the calculation of the charge.

 

A person has 20 business days to start an appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN.

 

Another way to appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN is the Building and Development Dispute Resolution Committee (Committee). The Committee provides an accessible, affordable and timely service for members of the public not satisfied with decisions made by local governments and private certifiers. Errors in the calculation of the charge can be appealed to the Committee, under section 535 of the SPA.

 

An appeal against an AICN or negotiated AICN, to either the Court or the Committees, is not an appeal against a development application, development approval, compliance assessment or compliance permit. As such, an appeal does not affect the period in which the corresponding development approval or compliance permit takes effect and lapses.

 

 

FOR YOUR REFERENCE:

 

Extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009- Section 478

 

478    Appeals about particular charges for infrastructure

 

(1) This section applies to a person who has been given, and is dissatisfied with—

(a) an infrastructure charges notice, regulated infrastructure charges notice, adopted infrastructure charges notice or regulated State infrastructure charges notice; or

(b) a negotiated infrastructure charges notice, negotiated regulated infrastructure charges notice, negotiated adopted infrastructure charges notice or negotiated regulated State  infrastructure charges notice.

(2) The person may appeal to the court against the notice.

(3) An appeal against a notice mentioned in subsection (1) must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice is given to the person.

(4) An appeal under this section may only be about—

(a) whether a charge in the notice is so unreasonable that no reasonable relevant local government, State infrastructure provider or coordinating agency could have imposed it; or

(b) an error in the calculation of the charge.

To see details of other sections of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, you can go to the legislation section of the Queensland Government website. The following internet link may assist:

http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/S/SustPlanA09.pdf

 

 http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/CURRENT/S/SustPlanA09.pdf

 

 
(5) To remove any doubt, it is declared that an appeal under this section can not be about the methodology used to establish an adopted infrastructure charge or the charge in a relevant infrastructure charges schedule, regulated infrastructure charges schedule or regulated State infrastructure charges schedule.

 

 

 

 

 


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 13.6

File Number: D14/26812

 

Subject Heading:                     Surat State School P&C Battery Muster Fundraiser

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                         

Location:                                           

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Cara Cicero, Administration Officer - Waste

 

Executive Summary: 

Council recently received a letter from the Surat State School showing their appreciation for supporting their Battery Muster fundraiser throughout 2013 and seeking further support for their 2014 program. The program has enabled the P&C to raise vital funds to enhance the schools facilities and provide the students with a comfortable learning environment. 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council resolve to undertake the following:

 

1.   Donate all batteries received at Council waste facilities in the Maranoa region towards the Surat State School P&C Battery Muster fund raiser for the remainder of 2014.

2.   Consider offering this opportunity to other interested schools next year.

 

 

Body of Report:

With the outcome of the 2013 Battery Muster fundraiser proving to be a great success, the Surat State School P&C wish to continue collecting batteries and raising funds for the school. In the past, the fundraiser has contributed to the cost of air-conditioning another classroom, enhancing the learning environment for  the students.

 

For this initiative to progress, it is proposed that Council consider donating all batteries received at its Waste facilities in the region to be donated to their muster for the remainder of 2014. 

 

Consultation (internal/external):

Margie Milla – Coordinator Waste

Tony Dixon – Waste Technical Officer

 

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

Nil

Policy Implications:

Work Health and Safety requirements to be met by the responsible Surat P & C representative, when collecting the batteries from Council.

Financial Resource Implications:

This program offers a recycling opportunity and encourages recycling within the Region.  The funds from such recycling is being spent within the community to improve the learning environment for children, whilst teaching a skill such as appropriate transportation and storage of matter.

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.5.9(a) To provide an efficient and reliable refuse collection and disposal service for all serviced areas in the region.

Supporting Documentation:

Nil

Report authorised by:

Margaret Milla, Coordinator - Waste

Sandra Crosby, Manager - Environmental Health, Compliance & Waste


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Officer Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 13.7

File Number: D14/26814

 

Subject Heading:                     Commerce Roma Request for Financial Support - Visual Merchandising Workshop

Classification:                                   Open Access  

Name of Applicant:                          Commerce Roma

Location:                                           

Author & Officer’s Title:                 Ryan Gittins, Specialist - Business Development

 

Executive Summary: 

 

On 11 December 2013, Council resolved to contribute $1,500 to a visual merchandising workshop through a Regional Services Program funding application (GM/12.2013/21), which is a program of Department of Tourism, Major Events, Small Business and the Commonwealth Games (DTESB).

 

Subsequent to this DTESB has reconsidered the program and has suggested that the funding application (and associated funds) should be devoted to a broader business support program, such as the existing Business Excellence Program which is being run in the Maranoa in conjunction with DSDIP, Commerce Roma, the Western Star and others.  Discussions related to the proposed business support program have commenced and are ongoing; at this stage a finalised plan has not been developed.

 

The business community has indicated that a visual merchandising workshop is still required in the Maranoa. As such, Commerce Roma has requested that the funds originally earmarked for the Regional Services Program funding application are reallocated to support their visual merchandising workshop, scheduled for 27 & 28 May 2014. 

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:  

That Council:

A.  Rescind resolution GM/12.2013/21

B.  Endorse financial support for Commerce Roma’s visual merchandising workshop, subject to the condition that attendance and involvement is promoted to all businesses in the region. 

C.  Explore other opportunities with DTESB to implement business support initiatives in the Maranoa (as applicable).

 

 

 

Body of Report:

 

On 11 December 2013, Council resolved to contribute $1,500 to a Regional Services Program funding application for the proposed visual merchandising workshop (GM/12.2013/21).

Following the submission of this application, DTESB has suggested that funding should be directed to a broader business support program, similar to the Business Excellence Program. Accordingly, discussions have commenced to determine what business support initiatives should be undertaken in the region. At this stage an event program has not been finalised, and the funds associated with GM/12.2013/21 will not be utilised in the foreseeable future.

The business community has indicated that a visual merchandising workshop is still desirable and required. Commerce Roma has requested financial support ($1500) for a visual merchandising workshop within their Shop Local – Invest Local (SLIL) program. It is anticipated that the workshop will be run on 27 and 28 May 2014, including a Breakfast workshop at the Santos shopfront (McDowall St) where participants will learn visual merchandising theory with practical demonstrations. Face-to-face follow ups will be held on the second day (28 May), with the consultant providing individual business assessments with written feedback to SLIL participating businesses.

Email from Sharyn Garrett – Executive Officer – Roma Commerce (16/04/14) :

 

Based on business training needs acquired through a survey conducted by Commerce Roma in recent months, it has verified that the services of a visual merchandiser to assess and train local businesses is both wanted and needed.

 

A visual merchandiser from Nick has been sourced to come to Roma to deliver a workshop and individual business assessments on 27 and 28 May 2014.  

 

Nick has a current working relationship with Santos GLNG, and is able to offer a subsidised cost for travel, the workshop and business assessments during this time.  

 

It is planned to host a breakfast workshop at the Santos shopfront, which will offer the opportunity for an interactive workshop where participants will learn theory in addition to a visual demonstration.  Businesses will leave with both information and takeaways to utilise back in their businesses to improve their displays and aesthetics of their shops.

 

The total cost required for this initiative is $1,500.  This includes all travel, workshop preparation and planning, breakfast for an anticipated 30 businesses, show bags and contents, and individual business assessments with written feedback.  This is clearly heavily subsidised by Nick and a great opportunity to provide this level of training and consultancy in Roma.  

______________

 

Is this sort of what you needed??

 

Cheers,

Sharyn.

Consultation (internal/external):

·    Ed Sims, Manager- Economic & Community Development

·    Rebecca Andrews Executive Director, Regional Services, Dept. Tourism, Major Events, Small Business & the Commonwealth Games (DTESB)

·    Business Excellence Program Committee

·    Sharyn Garrett, Commerce Roma

 

Risk Assessment (Legal, Financial, Political etc.):

Nil

Policy Implications:

Nil

Financial Resource Implications:

$1,500, allocated to the Business Excellence Program GL, within the Business Development budget.

 

Link to Corporate Plan:

Corporate Plan 2009-2013 8.4.1(b) To facilitate the provision of support initiatives for existing businesses and industry in the interest of maintaining and developing the regional economy.

Supporting Documentation:

Nil.

Report authorised by:

Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development       


Maranoa Regional Council

    

General Meeting -  23 April 2014

Status Report

Meeting: General  23 April 2014

Date: 16 April 2014

Item Number: 19.1

File Number: D14/26828

 

SUBJECT HEADING:                     Local Builders Group Meeting - 28 March 2014

Classification:                                   Open Access 

Report compiled by:                       Ryan Gittins, Specialist - Business Development

 

Month & Year of Report:                April 2014

Name of Department:                     Development, Facilities & Environmental Services

 

Executive Summary: 

A local builder’s group meeting was held on Friday 28 March 2014 in Roma, to discuss issues that are pertinent to the building industry in the Maranoa. As this was an inaugural meeting, it was also used to delineate the vision for the group.

 

It is anticipated that the meetings will be held on a monthly basis, with the next one scheduled for early May 2014.

 

 

Officer’s Recommendation:

That Council receives and note the Officer’s report as presented.

 

 

 

A local builder’s group meeting was held on Friday 28 March 2014 in Roma, to discuss issues that are pertinent to the building industry in the Maranoa. 5 members attended the initial meeting (3 x Council representatives, 2 x builders), with 5 apologies received from builders who were unable to attend the event. It is anticipated that attendance will continue to build as awareness about the group, and its benefit, spreads within the business community.

 

The key outcomes of the initial meeting are as follows:

·    Discussion regarding the purpose of the group, and how local builders can benefit from being involved,

·    Discussion about market forces, and the state of the building industry in the region,

·    Discussion on the ideal time/day for meetings to be held in the future,

·    Discussion about Council’s procurement process – clearing misconceptions and answering questions, and

·    An opportunity for Mandy Schneekloth (Coordinator – Council Buildings & Structures) to network with local builders and ask questions that are relevant to her role within Council.

 

For your information, please find attached the minutes from the meeting on 28 March.

The next meeting is scheduled for early May 2014.

 

 

Supporting Documentation:

1View

Minutes of Meeting - Local Builders Group - 28 March 2014

D14/26827

 

Report authorised by:

Edward Sims, Manager - Economic & Community Development

  


Attachment 1

Minutes of Meeting - Local Builders Group - 28 March 2014

 

MINUTES

Meeting              Local Builders Group                                                                                       Date      28 March 2014

Attendees          Cr. Schefe (DS), Mandy Schneekloth (MRC) (MS), Ryan Gittins (MRC)(RG), Peter Beitz(PB), Mark Nicholls (MN)

Apologies           Stephen Duff, Les Allwood, Six Mile Building, Tim White, Cr. O’Neil, Cr. Newman, Cr. Wason

Chairperson       Cr. Schefe                                           Minutes               Ryan Gittins                        Venue                  Ernest Brock Room, Roma

Description

Comments

Actions

Who

When

Meeting Commencement

6:53pm Friday 28 March 2014

 

 

 

Introduction

·    Discussion regarding local market & workloads

·    Meeting will be used  to create a voice for industry members to communicate with Council

·    Construction is a pillar of the economy – it’s everyone’s best interest to work collaboratively towards the industry’s development

·    VIC stats indicate that $1million construction investment results in 7 local jobs – significant wealth retained in the local economy.

·    Meetings will be held on a monthly basis

·    Question – Should this meeting be open to local businesses only or local branches? (More discussion next meeting)

·    Ideally the group should nominate a chairperson, council will provide ongoing support (eg. Organisation & minute taking)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Previous Minutes

Nil

 

 

 

Previous Actions

Nil

 

 

 

 

Agenda Items

 

Council Procurement Policy

·    Council is in the process of amending its procurement policy

·    Question – Do local builders have any concerns about the process to do business with Council?

·    Answer – sub-$150,000 work packages (quote system) are not complicated – tender system for bigger jobs is an issue.

·    Department of State Development Infrastructure & Planning (DSDIP) is developing a system that will help to increase the number of work packages provided to local businesses (increased communication and education)

·    Council will be holding a workshop on our procurement and tender process in June 2014 – all businesses welcome.

·    Council will release a ‘guide to doing business with Council’ (approximately June 2014) to help educate the business community on the process and clear up any misconceptions.

 

 

 

 

My Maranoa App

·    Council will release the My Maranoa App in April 2014– A mobile communication tool for residents and visitors.

·    A business directory will exist on the App and free registrations are now available.

·    App will inform local residents and council officers alike – approx. 75% of regional businesses don’t have an online presence; therefore it’s difficult to know what businesses are operating in the region and what their capability is.

 

 

 

Council Procurement – Facilities Department

·    MS has difficulty with getting 3 quotes from local tradespeople for various maintenance/building tasks.

·    MN – it is difficult to find the time to quote.

·    MS – could a local consultancy business (or similar) provide casual office support?

·    Council needs to implement systems for better communication (internally), non- ambiguous specification for work etc.

·    MS is happy to hear from local tradespeople who have capacity to work

 

 

 

Quality Assurance of tradespeople

·    MS has difficulty in vetting potential tradespeople

·    PB/MN – QBSA online provided a history of each builder

·    Registered tradespeople are subjected to annual audits.

·    Avoids duplication of asking for third-party accredited systems & processes, financial information etc. – all information available in one place.

 

 

 

General Discussion

·    Council certifiers are prompt

·    Question – Is there enough land available for development?

·    Answer – This is an issue, developers buy a majority of the lot stock and the cost of land is restricting development

·    Buoyant growth in Roma/ Maranoa – 1%p.a. growth – approx. 138 extra residents per year (regionally)

·    Best night for meetings – Thursday was suggested.

 

 

 

 

Next Meeting   Targeting Thursday 1 May 2014

Venue                  TBC

Chairperson       TBC

Minutes               Ryan Gittins